Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I'd also verify that your finance company actually filed the UCC-1 correctly even though it was late. I've seen cases where late filings also had other errors that made them completely ineffective.
StarSailor
•This is where Certana.ai's document checker really helps - you can upload the UCC-1 filing and it verifies debtor names, collateral descriptions, and filing compliance all at once.
Good point about double-checking the filing accuracy. A defective late filing is worse than no filing at all.
Ugh, timing issues like this are the worst part of equipment financing. The rules are clear but the consequences are brutal when mistakes happen. Hope you can find a way to recover through your dealer agreement or find errors in the competing lien.
Emma Davis
•At least you caught it relatively quickly. Some dealers don't realize they've lost priority until they try to repossess equipment months later.
True, and with electronic filing becoming standard, there's really no excuse for finance companies to miss these deadlines anymore.
Join the conversation
Drake
Update us when you get the corrected filing done! I'm curious to see how quickly it gets processed with the right debtor name.
Maya Patel
•Will do! Planning to file first thing tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed it goes through without any other issues.
Drake
•Should be smooth sailing once you have the correct legal entity name. The UCC system works great when you follow the rules exactly.
Sarah Jones
This thread should be required reading for anyone doing secured transactions. The number of deals that get messed up by simple debtor name errors under the UCC is just staggering.
That's why I'm such a fan of using verification tools like Certana now. Takes the guesswork out of whether your documents align properly.
Maya Patel
•Thanks everyone for all the advice. This has been incredibly helpful in a stressful situation.
Join the conversation
Amara Okafor
UPDATE: Finally got through at 5:30am this morning! Found one existing UCC-1 filing from 2019 that's still active. Looks like it's on different equipment though based on the collateral description. Going to double-check with Certana.ai to make sure there aren't any name variations or additional liens I missed before proceeding with our filing.
Glad the early morning approach worked! Certana will definitely catch any variations you might have missed in the manual search.
Ethan Clark
•At least you got through! Still can't believe we have to work around the system like this in 2025.
For future reference, the NH SOS usually posts system maintenance schedules on their website. Worth checking before important deadlines. Also, they're supposedly upgrading to a new portal system sometime this year, though they've been saying that for two years now...
Where on the website do they post maintenance schedules? I looked but couldn't find anything.
It's usually buried in the "announcements" section. Not always up to date though.
Join the conversation
NebulaKnight
The key with blanket liens is being descriptive enough without being too specific. Try 'all equipment, machinery, tools, and fixtures used in debtor's [type of business] operations, whether now owned or hereafter acquired.' That usually covers the bases.
Ethan Moore
•That's helpful. Our client is in manufacturing so I could specify that business type.
NebulaKnight
•Perfect. Manufacturing is specific enough to satisfy most filing offices while still giving you comprehensive coverage.
Make sure you're not mixing up blanket liens with floating liens. Blanket liens cover specific types of collateral broadly, while floating liens cover changing inventory. For equipment financing, you definitely want a blanket lien approach.
Ethan Moore
•We're definitely talking about a blanket lien. The equipment isn't changing, we just want to cover all of it without listing every individual piece.
Good, just wanted to make sure. The terminology gets confusing and using the wrong approach can cause problems.
Zoe Alexopoulos
For what it's worth, I've never seen a court invalidate a UCC filing over comma placement in an LLC name. The 'seriously misleading' standard under UCC 9-506 is pretty hard to meet with minor punctuation differences.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•That's the legal standard, but lenders have their own underwriting requirements that might be stricter than what courts would require.
0 coins
Mei Liu
•Exactly why it's worth having solid documentation upfront. Better to over-document than have deals fall apart over preventable issues.
0 coins
Liam O'Donnell
Just went through this exact scenario last week. Ended up filing a UCC-3 amendment to match the exact name format from the entity's current good standing certificate. Cost $25 and solved the lender's concerns immediately.
0 coins
Liam O'Donnell
•Filed electronically and it was processed same day. Much faster than trying to argue with the lender about name standards.
0 coins
Amara Nwosu
•Smart approach. Sometimes the $25 filing fee is cheaper than the time spent documenting why the original filing is sufficient.
0 coins