< Back to UCC Document Community

Maya Patel

UCC Filing Nightmare - Everything Under the UCC Goes Wrong When Names Don't Match

I'm drowning in a UCC mess and could really use some guidance from anyone who's been through this. We had what seemed like a straightforward equipment financing deal last month - $450K construction equipment for our concrete business. Everything looked good until we tried to perfect our security interest. Here's where it gets complicated: The borrower's legal name on their articles of incorporation is "Precision Concrete Solutions LLC" but they've been doing business as "PCS Construction" for years. Their bank accounts, insurance, everything is under PCS Construction. When we filed our UCC-1, we used "PCS Construction" as the debtor name since that's what was on all their financial documents. Guess what? The filing got rejected. Apparently under the UCC, you have to use the exact legal name from the organizational documents, not the DBA. Now I'm scrambling to fix this before our loan agreement deadlines kick in. I've got three questions: 1) Do I need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name, or do I start over with a new UCC-1? 2) How do I handle the gap in perfection timing - does this affect our priority position? 3) Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name mismatches under the UCC rules? This whole situation has me questioning everything I thought I knew about secured transactions. Any advice would be huge right now.

Oh man, been there! The debtor name requirements under the UCC are brutal - they don't care what name the business actually uses day-to-day. You absolutely need to use the exact name from the organizational documents filed with the Secretary of State. For your situation, I'd recommend filing a completely new UCC-1 with the correct legal name "Precision Concrete Solutions LLC." Don't bother with an amendment - start fresh to avoid any potential issues with the original rejected filing.

0 coins

Wait, wouldn't a UCC-3 amendment be faster though? I thought you could just correct errors that way without losing your original filing date.

0 coins

Not when the debtor name is completely wrong. Under UCC Article 9, if the debtor name doesn't match what's required, the filing is seriously misleading and basically worthless. Better to start over than risk having an ineffective security interest.

0 coins

That's what I was afraid of. So we're basically starting from square one on the perfection timing?

0 coins

Ava Kim

This is exactly why I always verify debtor names through the Secretary of State database before filing any UCC-1. The "seriously misleading" standard under the UCC is no joke - if a search under the filed name wouldn't turn up your financing statement, you're not perfected. Regarding your priority question - yes, you'll lose your original filing date. Your priority will be based on when you successfully file the corrected UCC-1, not when you attempted the first filing.

0 coins

Ugh, that's what I figured. This could really mess up our security position if there are other creditors involved.

0 coins

Ava Kim

Exactly. That's why getting the debtor name right the first time is so critical under the UCC. I've seen deals fall apart because someone filed under a DBA instead of the legal entity name.

0 coins

I actually discovered something that might help you avoid this kind of mess in the future. There's this tool called Certana.ai that lets you upload your charter documents and UCC forms to verify everything matches before you file. I started using it after having a similar debtor name disaster last year. You just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks all the names, filing numbers, everything automatically. Would have caught your PCS Construction vs Precision Concrete Solutions LLC issue immediately.

0 coins

That sounds incredibly useful. How does it work exactly? Do you upload both the articles of incorporation and the UCC-1 draft?

0 coins

Yeah, exactly. You can do a Charter→UCC-1 check workflow where it compares your entity documents against your financing statement draft. Catches name mismatches, inconsistent addresses, all that stuff that can kill a filing under the UCC.

0 coins

Never heard of Certana but honestly anything that prevents UCC filing disasters is worth looking into. These debtor name requirements are so strict.

0 coins

Just went through something similar with a client who had been using a shortened version of their LLC name on everything. Filed the UCC-1 under the shortened name and got rejected for the same reason. What made it worse was we had a 30-day deadline to perfect from the loan closing. Had to scramble to get a new UCC-1 filed with the correct legal name. Lesson learned: always pull the actual organizational documents from the state database, don't rely on what the borrower tells you their name is.

0 coins

30 days?? That's cutting it close. How do you even verify the exact legal name quickly when you're under that kind of pressure?

0 coins

Secretary of State online database is usually the fastest way. Most states let you search by entity name or number. Just make sure you're copying it exactly as it appears on the certificate of formation or articles.

0 coins

This is giving me anxiety about my own filings. I always just use whatever name is on the loan documents without thinking about it.

0 coins

The UCC debtor name rules are honestly a nightmare. I've been doing secured transactions for 15 years and I still see experienced attorneys mess this up. The courts have made it clear that "close enough" doesn't cut it under Article 9. For your specific situation, file the new UCC-1 immediately with "Precision Concrete Solutions LLC" as the debtor name. Don't wait around hoping the amendment route will work.

0 coins

Good point. I'm going to get the corrected filing done tomorrow morning. Just hoping no one else files against this debtor in the meantime.

0 coins

Smart move. The gap in perfection is always a risk, but the longer you wait, the worse it gets. At least you caught the problem quickly.

0 coins

UGH this exact thing happened to me last month!!! Filed under "ABC Services" when the legal name was "ABC Services, Inc." - REJECTED. The Secretary of State doesn't mess around with debtor names under the UCC. I was so frustrated because literally everyone calls them ABC Services, their website, their checks, everything. But nope, had to be the exact legal name with the ", Inc." included.

0 coins

It's so ridiculous how picky they are about punctuation and exact wording. Like, obviously it's the same company!

0 coins

RIGHT?! But I guess that's what makes UCC searches reliable. If everyone could file under whatever name they felt like, the whole system would be chaos.

0 coins

I mean... it kind of already is chaos trying to figure out what the actual legal name is for some of these entities.

0 coins

Been lurking but had to jump in here. I handle UCC filings for a mid-size bank and this debtor name issue comes up constantly. We actually started using document verification tools to catch these problems before filing. One thing that's helped us is Certana.ai's UCC document checker. You upload your entity docs and draft UCC forms and it flags any inconsistencies automatically. Saved us from several rejections like yours.

0 coins

Second mention of Certana - seems like it might be worth checking out. Do you know if it handles continuation filings too?

0 coins

Yeah, it does UCC-3 checks against original UCC-1s too. Really helpful for making sure amendments and continuations reference the right filing information.

0 coins

This whole thread is making me paranoid about every UCC filing I've ever done. How many of us are walking around thinking we're perfected when we're actually not because of debtor name issues? The scary part is you might not find out until you need to enforce the security interest and discover your filing was ineffective the whole time.

0 coins

That's exactly why lien searches are so important. You should be running UCC searches periodically to make sure your filings are actually showing up correctly.

0 coins

Good point. I should probably audit all our active UCC filings to make sure we don't have any similar problems lurking.

0 coins

Honestly this discussion has convinced me to be way more careful about debtor names going forward. Better safe than sorry with UCC filings.

0 coins

Drake

Update us when you get the corrected filing done! I'm curious to see how quickly it gets processed with the right debtor name.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to file first thing tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed it goes through without any other issues.

0 coins

Drake

Should be smooth sailing once you have the correct legal entity name. The UCC system works great when you follow the rules exactly.

0 coins

This thread should be required reading for anyone doing secured transactions. The number of deals that get messed up by simple debtor name errors under the UCC is just staggering.

0 coins

Ava Kim

Absolutely. It's one of those things that seems basic but trips up even experienced practitioners.

0 coins

That's why I'm such a fan of using verification tools like Certana now. Takes the guesswork out of whether your documents align properly.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the advice. This has been incredibly helpful in a stressful situation.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today