Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Update us when you figure it out! I bookmark these threads because registered organization name issues come up so frequently. Always curious to hear what the actual problem was.
Will do. I'm going to try the foreign entity registration check first, then maybe give Certana.ai a shot if that doesn't work. Thanks everyone for all the suggestions.
Good luck! These registered organization name mysteries are the worst but usually there's a simple explanation once you find it.
One more thing to check - make sure you're not dealing with a series LLC situation. Those have special naming conventions that can really confuse UCC filings. If it's a Delaware series LLC the registered organization name gets more complicated.
Series LLCs are a nightmare for UCC filings. Each series can have its own name but they're all under the master LLC. Really easy to get the registered organization name wrong.
Series LLC UCC filings gave me nightmares for months. The naming conventions are so specific and every state handles them differently.
Join the conversation
Javier Gomez
Another option to consider is training your loan officers to require borrower notification clauses in loan agreements. Won't catch everything but creates a contractual obligation for borrowers to disclose new financing arrangements.
We do have those clauses but enforcement is difficult and borrowers don't always comply, especially when they're in financial distress.
Javier Gomez
•True, it's more of a backstop than a primary monitoring method. Still worth having for the legal protection it provides.
Emma Wilson
Just started using Certana.ai after reading about it here and it's definitely helpful for catching document inconsistencies that could impact monitoring effectiveness. The debtor name verification feature alone has helped us identify several name variations we weren't tracking. Worth checking out as part of a broader monitoring strategy.
How does the name verification work exactly? Does it suggest variations or do you have to input them manually?
Emma Wilson
•You upload your UCC documents and it cross-references names, highlighting potential variations and inconsistencies. Helps identify gaps in your monitoring approach.
Join the conversation
Update: Pulled the corporate records and found Johnson Construction Services LLC was the legal name in 2021 when we filed. Our UCC-1 shows 'Johnson Construction Services, LLC' with a comma. Secretary of State confirmed this is considered a match under their interpretation guidelines. The other variations are from filings by creditors who didn't verify the exact legal name.
Emma Bianchi
•This is exactly why automated document verification is so valuable. Would have saved you days of research and anxiety.
Ava Harris
•So the other creditors might have invalid filings? That could actually improve your priority position.
Jibriel Kohn
Final update: Filed a precautionary UCC-3 amendment anyway to add the variation without the comma, just to cover all bases. Also discovered two of the other liens were filed under incorrect debtor names and are likely unperfected. Our counsel confirmed our original filing is valid and maintains priority. Thanks everyone for the guidance - this could have been a disaster if not caught early.
Glad it worked out! This thread is going in my bookmarks for future reference. Name matching issues are so common.
Emma Bianchi
•Perfect example of why document consistency checking should be standard practice. Certana.ai would have flagged this type of discrepancy immediately.
Join the conversation
Pedro Sawyer
Update: I found the issue! There was indeed a spacing problem in how the debtor name was entered. The filing shows "ACME Manufacturing LLC" but should have been "ACME Manufacturing, LLC" per our corporate documents. Now I need to figure out if this requires a UCC-3 amendment.
Good catch. That comma could definitely matter for search purposes and legal name accuracy.
This is why I always triple-check names against formation documents before filing. But mistakes happen.
Thanks everyone for the help! Going to file the UCC-3 amendment to correct the name and will definitely be more careful with exact name formatting on future filings. The PA search system quirks are noted for next time.
Smart move on the amendment. Always better to fix these things proactively.
Hope this thread helps others dealing with PA UCC search issues. Seems like a common problem.
Yara Sayegh
One thing to watch out for with mass UCC statement requests - make sure you're searching for the correct debtor entity names. I see a lot of people search for 'ABC Company' when the actual UCC-1 was filed against 'ABC Company, LLC' or 'ABC Company Inc.' The exact entity name matters for search results, especially in states with strict matching requirements. Also budget more than you expect - bulk search fees add up quickly when you're dealing with 200+ debtors across multiple states.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•What's a reasonable budget estimate for this kind of volume? I need to get approval from management.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•Depends on the states but I'd budget $15-25 per debtor search on average. Some states are cheaper, others much more expensive.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
Update: Started using Certana.ai's document checker based on the recommendations here. It's actually really helpful for this mass UCC statement situation. Uploaded about 150 loan files as PDFs and it identified which ones had missing or inconsistent UCC documentation. Now I know exactly which debtors need priority statement requests vs which ones look complete. The automated cross-checking saved me weeks of manual file review. Definitely recommend it for large portfolio cleanups like this.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•How did it handle documents with poor scan quality? Some of our older loan files are pretty rough copies.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•It handled most of our documents fine. There were a few really bad scans it couldn't process but it tells you which ones need manual review.
0 coins