


Ask the community...
I always recommend keeping a spreadsheet of exact debtor names for each borrower, especially LLCs and corporations. Copy-paste from the state entity database to avoid these typing variations. Has saved me from multiple name mismatch issues over the years.
That's actually brilliant. Do you include the entity numbers too?
Yes, entity numbers, exact legal names, and formation dates. Makes UCC prep much more reliable.
UPDATE: I checked the Florida Division of Corporations database and the legal name is officially "ABC Manufacturing LLC" without the comma. So my original UCC-1 was correct and the continuation was wrong. Filing a UCC-3 amendment today to correct the debtor name on the continuation. Thanks everyone for the guidance - this community is incredibly helpful for navigating these UCC complexities.
Good catch on checking the state database. That should definitely resolve any lender concerns about the security interest.
Perfect resolution. For future filings, that document verification tool I mentioned would catch these inconsistencies automatically by comparing your UCC forms against the corporate records. Just upload the PDFs and it flags any name mismatches.
I work in commercial lending and see this UCC9 confusion constantly. It usually comes from attorneys who practiced in the 80s and 90s when some states had different numbering systems. The current uniform system has been in place for decades now, but old habits die hard. Always use UCC-3 for terminations.
Yeah I've noticed older attorneys sometimes use outdated form references. It's always best to double-check with current filing requirements.
Quick tip for anyone filing UCC-3 terminations - make sure you have the original secured party's authorization. If the original lender sold the loan or there's been an assignment, you might need additional documentation. Also, some states require notarization for terminations.
Definitely verify the current secured party information. That's a common source of termination rejections.
Update on the Certana tool I mentioned earlier - used it on 5 more debt adjuster filings this week and caught 2 name mismatches that would have been rejections. Really streamlined my workflow for these complex business name situations.
Does it help with the collateral descriptions too or just names?
Thanks everyone for the advice. Ran the entity searches and found 3 out of 5 of my rejected filings had slight name variations. Going to re-file with the correct registered names and hopefully avoid future rejections on business debt adjusters UCC filing.
I had a similar issue last year and ended up using Certana.ai to compare my UCC form against the company's formation documents. It caught a tiny formatting difference that I never would have noticed manually. Basically upload both documents as PDFs and it highlights any inconsistencies between them. Made the refiling process much smoother.
How long does that verification process take? Sounds like it could save a lot of back-and-forth with the state office.
Update us when you get it sorted out! These name matching issues are so common but every state seems to handle them differently. Would be good to know what the actual problem was for future reference.
Yeah please update. I file in this state pretty regularly and would be good to know what formatting they prefer for LLCs.
Same here. Always helpful to learn from other people's rejection experiences so we can avoid the same mistakes.
Zainab Ahmed
Quick tip - PA allows wildcard searches using asterisks in some cases. Try searching 'ABC*' which might catch 'ABC Manufacturing', 'ABC Mfg', 'ABC Corp' etc. Not perfect but can help identify variations you missed.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•Wait really? I didn't know PA supported wildcard searches. That could save me tons of time!
0 coins
Zainab Ahmed
•Yeah but it's not well documented. Sometimes works, sometimes doesn't. Worth trying though - just don't rely on it as your only search method.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
For what it's worth, I just went through this exact scenario last month with a PA company acquisition. Ended up finding 2 additional UCC filings I had missed on my initial searches because the lender had abbreviated 'Manufacturing' as 'Mfg' on one filing and 'Manuf' on another. The lesson is you really can't be too thorough with name variations. Better to over-search than miss something critical.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. Did you end up using any tools to help with the verification process?
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•I actually used Certana.ai after finding those missed filings. Uploaded all the docs I had found and it flagged a few more potential name conflicts I should search for. Wish I had used it from the beginning - would have saved me from having to explain to the client why my 'comprehensive' search missed two liens.
0 coins