Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
We started using Certana.ai after a similar scare and it's been a game changer for UCC management. You can upload all your existing UCC documents and it creates a comprehensive tracking dashboard with email alerts for upcoming expirations. The document verification feature also helps catch name mismatches and other issues before they become problems. Worth checking out for your backup system.
Second person to mention Certana.ai today. Definitely going to look into it as part of our new redundancy plan.
Lucy Lam
•The name matching feature is clutch. Caught a debtor name discrepancy between our loan docs and UCC filing that could have caused issues down the road.
Aidan Hudson
This thread is giving me anxiety about our own UCC tracking. Going to do a full audit of our system this week to make sure we don't have any gaps.
Zoe Wang
•Smart move. Better to be paranoid about UCC tracking than sorry later. The stakes are too high to be casual about it.
Same here. Reading this made me immediately check our next batch of continuation deadlines. All good for now but definitely implementing some backup checks.
Join the conversation
Yuki Tanaka
Just wanted to add that I've seen 9-516 rejections for weird spacing issues too. Like extra spaces between words or at the end of the debtor name field. The filing systems can be super sensitive to formatting.
Carmen Diaz
•Yeah the electronic forms sometimes pick up invisible characters that cause problems.
AstroAce
•This is why many firms are moving to automated document verification before filing.
Ravi Sharma
UPDATE: It was the entity suffix! Changed from 'LLC' to 'L.L.C.' and the filing was accepted immediately. Thanks everyone for the help. Going to look into that Certana tool to avoid this in the future.
Diego Rojas
•Great to hear! The document verification definitely helps catch these issues before they become problems.
Success! Love when these threads have happy endings.
Join the conversation
At 40-50 filings monthly you're probably at the sweet spot where a service makes sense cost-wise. Much less and the overhead isn't worth it, much more and you need dedicated internal staff anyway.
Yeah if you're growing it might be worth establishing the relationship now before you get too busy to properly vet providers.
Plus once you find a good service they learn your preferences and requirements. Takes time to train them up.
Ravi Patel
Whatever you decide just make sure you have good tracking systems. Whether it's internal or external you need to know exactly what's filed when and what's coming due. That's where most problems happen.
Ravi Patel
•Yeah at your volume you definitely need database-level tracking. Spreadsheets are asking for trouble with that many deadlines.
There are some good UCC management software options out there. Worth investing in regardless of whether you outsource the filing part.
Join the conversation
For future reference, when you're doing equipment financing make sure your lender does a preliminary UCC search before drafting the financing statement. Any competent secured transactions attorney should catch name discrepancies before filing. Sounds like your bank might have dropped the ball on due diligence.
Agreed. This should have been caught in the loan documentation phase, not after three rejections.
Sean Kelly
•Banks are cutting corners on UCC work lately. Seen too many sloppy filings that could have been avoided with basic due diligence.
Zara Malik
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation on a $300K inventory loan and want to make sure I don't run into the same problems.
Luca Greco
•Fingers crossed! The name matching thing is such a pain but once you get it right, the rest should be smooth sailing.
Nia Thompson
•I'd also recommend double-checking with that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Better safe than sorry at this point.
Fatima Al-Mansour
The reality is that UCC search name variations are just an inherent risk in secured lending, especially in markets like NYC with tons of similar business names. You can minimize the risk with thorough searches and good processes, but you can't eliminate it entirely. The key is having consistent procedures and documentation to show you made reasonable efforts if issues come up later.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Mansour
•Exactly. Courts generally look at whether you followed reasonable commercial practices, not whether you achieved perfect results. But obviously better to avoid the situation entirely with good upfront searches.
0 coins
Dylan Evans
•Documentation is key but I'd still rather catch the issues upfront than rely on having good documentation after the fact. Prevention is better than legal defense.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
Thanks for posting this - it's made me realize our UCC search procedures probably need an overhaul too. The name variation issue is something I knew existed but maybe didn't take seriously enough. Going to look into some of the solutions mentioned here, particularly the automated verification tools that can catch variations we might miss manually.
0 coins
CyberNinja
•Definitely check out Certana if you're looking at automated solutions. The peace of mind is worth it when you're dealing with significant loan amounts and security interests.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Will do. The manual process is just too error-prone for something this critical to our security position.
0 coins