Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Zainab Ahmed
Just wanted to follow up on this thread - I ended up using an automated document checker for my continuation filings and it worked great. Found several name inconsistencies I would have missed. All my filings went through without any rejections. Thanks everyone for the advice!
That's awesome! I'm definitely going to use one of these tools for my batch of continuations. This thread has been really helpful.
Glad it worked out! These kinds of tools are becoming essential for anyone doing volume UCC work.
This conversation has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation in my state and was dreading the manual comparison process for multiple continuation filings. Based on everyone's experiences here, it sounds like using an automated document verification tool is the way to go. The stories about rejections over missing commas and punctuation really drive home how precise these filings need to be. I'm definitely going to try one of those AI-powered comparison tools before submitting my continuations. Thanks for sharing all your real-world experiences - it's so much more valuable than trying to decipher the official guidance!
I'm so glad I found this thread too! As someone new to UCC filings, I was really intimidated by all the technical requirements and potential for costly mistakes. Reading about everyone's experiences with document verification tools has given me confidence that there are practical solutions available. The fact that multiple people have successfully used automated comparison tools and caught issues they would have missed manually is really reassuring. I'll definitely be investing in one of these services before I handle my first batch of continuation filings. Better to spend a little upfront than risk rejections and refiling fees!
Join the conversation
As someone who's been through several UCC terminations, I'd add one more tip - pull an official UCC search report AFTER you file the termination to confirm it actually cleared from the public records. I had one case where the termination was "accepted" but due to a system glitch it didn't actually remove the lien from the searchable database. Cost me $15 for the search report but saved a lot of headache later when we needed clean records for a refinancing deal. Better to verify it's truly gone than assume everything worked correctly.
Isla Fischer
•That's excellent advice about pulling the search report afterward! I never would have thought to do that verification step but it makes total sense. For $15 it's definitely worth the peace of mind to confirm everything processed correctly. Thanks for sharing that tip - I'll make sure to do that once I get my UCC-3 filed.
That's a really smart verification step! I've had similar experiences with other government filings where the acceptance confirmation didn't mean everything actually updated in the system. For such a small cost, pulling that search report is definitely worth it to make sure the lien is truly cleared. I'll definitely add that to my process - thanks for the pro tip!
This is super helpful - I'm actually dealing with a similar situation right now with equipment financing that was paid off a few months ago. One thing I wanted to add is that some states have online portals where you can check the status of your UCC filings in real-time, which can be really useful both before and after filing your termination. Also, if you're working with an equipment finance company, they sometimes have their own preferred process or timeline for handling terminations, so it's worth asking them upfront what they typically do. I learned this the hard way when I waited 6 weeks thinking my lender would file automatically, only to find out they expected me to handle it!
Aidan Percy
•That's a great point about checking with the lender first! I wish I had known about those online portals when I was dealing with my UCC situation last year. It would have saved me a lot of stress wondering whether everything was processing correctly. The 6-week wait you mentioned sounds frustrating - I can see how easy it would be to assume the lender would handle it automatically. Do you happen to know if most states have those real-time online portals, or is it just certain ones? It would be really helpful to know what to look for when checking UCC status online.
Join the conversation
Sounds like you've got a pretty standard blanket lien setup. The manufacturing context doesn't really change the basics - your UCC-1 should cover all the personal property collateral continuously as it turns over. Just stay current with your filings and monitor for any major changes in the debtor's business structure.
Appreciate all the feedback from everyone. Feeling much more confident about our filing coverage now.
Glad we could help. Blanket liens are pretty straightforward once you understand the basics.
One additional consideration for your multi-location manufacturing client - make sure you understand how your state treats consigned inventory or equipment held on bailment. Even with strong blanket lien language, you might not have a security interest in goods that the debtor doesn't actually own. Worth confirming during your collateral audits that major equipment purchases are actually owned outright rather than leased or held under retention-of-title arrangements. This becomes especially important with expensive manufacturing equipment where lease-to-own structures are common.
That's a really important point about consigned inventory and leased equipment. I've seen situations where lenders thought they had blanket coverage but discovered major pieces of equipment were actually under operating leases. Do you recommend specific language in the security agreement to address this, or is it more about due diligence during the initial collateral review?
Join the conversation
Bottom line: 5 years from filing date, file continuation 6 months before expiration, extends for another 5 years. Set up a tracking system now so you don't miss any deadlines. The consequences of letting a UCC lapse can be severe if other creditors or bankruptcy happens.
Lydia Bailey
•Good luck! It's really not that complicated once you have a system in place.
Eli Butler
•This thread was super helpful. I have some 2020 filings too that I need to address soon.
Nia Davis
I've been dealing with similar UCC tracking challenges and wanted to share what worked for me. After missing a continuation deadline last year (luckily caught it just in time), I implemented a three-tier reminder system: 8 months out for initial planning, 6 months out for document preparation, and 4 months out for final review and filing. Also recommend keeping a master file with copies of all original UCC-1s, filing receipts, and any amendments - makes the continuation process much smoother when you have everything organized in one place.
That's a really smart three-tier system! I like the idea of having multiple checkpoints instead of just one reminder. The master file organization tip is especially helpful - I've been scrambling to find original documents when I need them. Do you keep physical copies or scan everything digitally? I'm trying to figure out the best way to organize all these UCC documents for easy access.
Rosie Harper
Just went through this for our policy update. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify that all our UCC references were consistent across documents. Found several places where we were citing different subsections for the same requirement. Really streamlined the cleanup process.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
•Pretty quick - just upload your policy docs and it flags inconsistencies automatically. Much faster than manual review.
0 coins
Demi Hall
•We should look into this for our next policy review cycle. Tired of finding citation inconsistencies during audits.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
As a newcomer to UCC compliance work, I'm finding this discussion really helpful! One question - when you're citing state-specific variations, do you typically include both the UCC model provision AND the state statute number in every reference, or is there a shorthand approach for internal documents? Also, for someone just getting started with secured transactions, are there any go-to resources for understanding which UCC provisions are most commonly referenced in lending operations? I want to make sure I'm focusing on the right sections first.
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
•Great advice from Carlos! I'd also suggest checking out the Uniform Law Commission's website - they have excellent resources explaining the differences between the model UCC and various state adoptions. For practical application, consider subscribing to a UCC filing service's newsletter (like CT Corporation or CSC) as they often publish state-specific updates when filing requirements change. One tip that saved me early on: create a simple spreadsheet tracking which states you operate in and their key variation points (like different continuation periods or fixture filing requirements). It's much easier than trying to memorize everything!
0 coins
Amara Torres
•Adding to these great suggestions - as someone who went through the same learning curve a few years ago, I'd recommend starting with the UCC filing office search functions in your key states. Most have good tutorials that walk you through the practical side of how citations work in real filings. Also, don't underestimate the value of joining your state bankers association if you haven't already - they often have UCC working groups or seminars that are incredibly helpful for newcomers. The networking alone will save you tons of time when you run into specific questions down the road.
0 coins