UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Dylan Mitchell

Security interest attachment issues - for a security interest to attach, there must be an agreement

Running into problems with our UCC-1 filing that just got rejected by the SOS office. The rejection notice says something about 'insufficient evidence of agreement' but I thought our security agreement was solid. We're a small equipment finance company and this is for a $180K construction equipment loan. The debtor signed everything but now I'm wondering if there's something missing in our attachment process. I know for a security interest to attach, there must be an agreement, but what exactly constitutes proper evidence of this agreement for UCC purposes? The collateral is clearly described as 'all construction equipment including but not limited to excavators, bulldozers, and related machinery' but maybe that's too broad? This is holding up our entire loan closing and I'm getting pressure from management. Has anyone else dealt with attachment issues when the agreement seems complete but the filing still gets rejected?

Freya Larsen

•

Sometimes the issue is timing. If the debtor didn't have rights in the collateral when you filed, the attachment might be defective even if the agreement is valid. When was the equipment purchased relative to your security agreement date?

0 coins

The equipment was purchased two weeks before we signed the security agreement, so the debtor definitely had rights in it. The timeline should be fine.

0 coins

Then it's definitely a filing issue, not an attachment issue. Focus on getting the UCC-1 corrected and refiled.

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

UPDATE: I ran our documents through Certana.ai's verification tool and it immediately flagged that our debtor name on the UCC-1 was missing 'LLC' at the end even though the security agreement had it correct. Such a simple mistake but it would have caused endless problems. Refiling now with the corrected name. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

Glad you got it sorted out. It's amazing how one missing word can derail an entire filing. Good reminder to double-check everything.

0 coins

This thread convinced me to try Certana.ai for our next filing. Better safe than sorry with these UCC rejections.

0 coins

StellarSurfer

UCC Search NV - Secretary of State Portal Keeps Timing Out During Critical Debtor Name Verification

Been trying to run a comprehensive UCC search NV through the Nevada SOS portal for the past three days and keep getting system timeouts right when I'm about to pull the results. This is for a $750K equipment financing deal and I need to verify there are no existing liens on the debtor before we file our UCC-1. The search keeps hanging when I enter the exact debtor name from the articles of incorporation. Has anyone else experienced these portal issues lately? The client is breathing down my neck because we're supposed to close next week and I can't move forward without confirming the collateral is clear. Tried different browsers, cleared cache, even attempted the search from different IP addresses but same result every time. Starting to wonder if there's a specific way to format the debtor name that works better with their system.

Liam McGuire

•

Been following this thread because I'm dealing with similar Nevada portal issues. Just wanted to update that I tried the Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it actually worked really well. Uploaded my debtor's incorporation docs and it immediately showed me three different name variations to try in the UCC search. The second variation went right through the Nevada portal without any timeouts.

0 coins

Liam McGuire

•

It focuses on the value rather than cost - the time it saved me was huge compared to manually trying different name combinations for hours.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

This sounds like exactly what I need for my current Nevada filing. Going to check it out today.

0 coins

Quick update for anyone still following - tried the early morning search suggestion and it worked! Portal was much more responsive at 7am PST. Got my UCC search results in under 2 minutes. Looks like timing really is everything with Nevada's system. Thanks for all the helpful suggestions everyone!

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

Perfect timing on your closing too. Nothing worse than UCC search delays holding up a deal.

0 coins

NeonNomad

•

This is good intel for future Nevada filings. Going to bookmark this thread for reference.

0 coins

Oliver Zimmermann

UCC filing rejected twice - New Jersey Secretary of State portal keeps bouncing back my documents

I'm at my wit's end here. Been trying to file a UCC-1 for our equipment financing deal and the New Jersey Secretary of State system has rejected it TWICE now. First rejection was for 'insufficient debtor name information' even though I copied the exact legal name from their business registration. Second time they said the collateral description was 'too vague' - but I followed the standard language we always use! The loan closes next week and I'm starting to panic. Has anyone else had issues with NJ's online filing system lately? The rejection notices don't give enough detail to figure out what's actually wrong. This is a $750K equipment loan and I can't afford to have the UCC filing mess up the perfection. Any advice on what NJ specifically wants to see in these filings?

Quick question - are you filing this as a regular UCC-1 or is there a fixture component? Restaurant equipment can get tricky if any of it's attached to real estate. NJ has specific requirements for fixture filings that are different from regular UCC-1s.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

If there's any equipment that's permanently attached or built into the building structure you'll want to consider fixture filing. That requires different forms and gets filed in real estate records too.

0 coins

Exactly. Things like built-in ovens, permanent ventilation systems, fixed counters might need fixture treatment. Regular UCC-1 won't perfect your interest in those items.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

Update us when you get it figured out! I've got a NJ filing coming up next month and want to avoid the same headaches. This thread has been super helpful for understanding their current requirements.

0 coins

Will definitely post an update once I get through this. Hopefully the name verification and more detailed collateral description will do the trick.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Same here - bookmarking this thread for reference. The tips about checking original entity documents and using UCC-11 searches are gold.

0 coins

Annabel Kimball

UCC allows inspection to take place when contract doesn't specify timeframe - need filing advice

Our company just discovered that one of our equipment financing contracts from 2023 doesn't specify an inspection period, but we know the UCC allows inspection to take place in these situations. The issue is our UCC-1 filing might have problems because we described the collateral as 'manufacturing equipment subject to inspection rights' but didn't reference the specific UCC provision about reasonable time for inspection when contracts are silent. Now we're getting conflicting advice about whether we need to file a UCC-3 amendment to clarify our security interest or if the original filing is sufficient. The debtor is claiming our lien is invalid because the inspection clause is too vague. Has anyone dealt with UCC filings where the underlying contract relies on UCC default inspection rules? I'm worried we might lose our security interest over this technicality.

Khalil Urso

•

Look, the bottom line is your UCC-1 establishes your security interest in the collateral. The inspection rights come from the UCC itself when contracts are silent. Your lien isn't going anywhere because of inspection clause wording. Tell the debtor's attorney to cite the specific UCC section that supports their argument - bet they can't.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

Exactly. Most of these challenges fall apart when you ask for actual citations and precedent.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

This is why I love working with lenders who understand UCC law. Makes it so much easier to call out frivolous challenges.

0 coins

Final thought - if you're still worried, consider getting a UCC opinion letter from qualified counsel. Will cost a few thousand but gives you definitive protection against these kinds of challenges. Sometimes worth it for peace of mind on larger deals.

0 coins

Not a bad idea for future deals. This one probably doesn't justify the expense but good to know the option exists.

0 coins

Yeah, depends on deal size and risk tolerance. But can definitely shut down debtor attorney fishing expeditions.

0 coins

Levi Parker

SOS NM UCC search showing outdated results - need help with database timing

Been dealing with a weird issue on the New Mexico SOS UCC search system. Filed a UCC-1 last Wednesday for equipment financing on a construction client, got the confirmation number and everything looked good. But when I run searches on the debtor name, it's still not showing up in results even though it's been 4 business days. Called the office and they said sometimes the search database takes longer to update than the filing system confirms. Anyone else run into this timing lag with SOS NM UCC search? Need to provide proof of filing to the client's bank by end of week and they want to see it show up in public search results, not just my filing receipt. This is holding up a pretty significant equipment loan and I'm starting to sweat it.

Axel Far

•

The New Mexico SOS website actually has a disclaimer somewhere that says search results may take 3-5 business days to update after filing. It's buried in their FAQ section but it's there. Your filing is almost certainly fine, just caught in their slow database sync process.

0 coins

Axel Far

•

Yeah it's under their 'frequently asked questions' about UCC filings. Having that official statement from the state usually helps with nervous lenders.

0 coins

Most state websites have similar disclaimers buried somewhere. Database sync delays seem to be a universal problem with government systems.

0 coins

Update: Just tried that Certana.ai verification tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded my UCC-1 PDF and it confirmed everything looks correct - debtor name, filing number, all the details match up properly. At least I know the filing itself isn't the problem, just waiting on New Mexico's database to catch up. Thanks for the suggestion!

0 coins

Libby Hassan

•

That's great news. Having that verification should help with the bank too - shows you've done your due diligence to make sure everything is filed properly.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Otto

•

See, told you it was worth trying! Now you can focus on managing the bank's expectations rather than worrying about filing errors.

0 coins

Prev1...500501502503504...684Next