Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I actually used that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier and it's pretty slick. Uploaded my problem docs and it immediately flagged the name issue plus caught two other minor discrepancies I hadn't noticed. Definitely worth the few minutes it took to run the check. Made me feel much more confident about what needed to be fixed vs what was probably fine as-is.
Paolo Rizzo
•Did it give you any guidance on whether the punctuation difference was likely to be a real problem or just a potential issue?
It flagged it as a moderate risk item and suggested checking the state database first, then considering an amendment if there was a mismatch. Pretty reasonable advice actually.
Zara Shah
Update: checked the Illinois SOS database and they show the company name as 'MIDWEST INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LLC' (no comma, all caps). So actually my UCC filing matches the official state record exactly. Looks like the Articles I was looking at had the comma but the state database doesn't. Crisis averted! Thanks everyone for the advice about checking the official records first.
QuantumQuest
•Great outcome. This happens more often than people realize - the incorporation docs and state database don't always match exactly due to formatting standards.
Emma Davis
•Nice work doing the research. This is exactly the kind of thing that document verification tools can help catch before you file, but sounds like you're all set now.
Join the conversation
Sofia Torres
Update: Just tried the Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and wow, it caught three potential issues with my revised UCC-1 before I refiled. Turns out the after-acquired property language wasn't the only problem - there was also a minor debtor name discrepancy I missed. Really glad I checked before submitting again and risking another rejection.
Sofia Torres
•Pretty much instant once you upload the PDFs. It generates a report showing any inconsistencies between your security agreement and UCC-1, plus flags potential filing issues. Definitely worth the peace of mind.
I was skeptical about these automated tools but if it's catching stuff human reviewers miss, might be worth trying. These rejections are costing us too much time and money.
Final update - refiled with more specific collateral categories and cleaned up the debtor name issue. UCC-1 was accepted this time! Thanks everyone for the suggestions. For anyone else dealing with after-acquired property description rejections, definitely be more specific about property types rather than using broad categories, and double-check every character in the debtor name.
Ended up with separate lines for each category: 'All inventory now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor,' 'All equipment now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor,' etc. Much cleaner than my original version.
Good to know! I'll remember that format for my next filing. Thanks for sharing the solution.
Join the conversation
Chloe Harris
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm dealing with some NC UCC issues myself and would love to know what finally worked for you.
QuantumQuest
•Will do! I'm going to try the single filing approach first and make sure I have the exact debtor name format. Hopefully that does the trick.
Chloe Harris
•Good luck! NC can be frustrating but once you crack their system it gets easier.
Just went through this exact same thing last month. Turns out I was using an old mailing address on the request form. Make sure you're sending it to their current address - they moved some operations around and the old address was causing delays and rejections.
No problem! It's such a simple thing but it cost me two weeks of back and forth before I figured it out.
Same thing happened to me with a different state. These address changes never get communicated well.
Join the conversation
Talia Klein
This reminds me of when I was dealing with a continuation filing that kept getting rejected. Turned out I needed to verify the original UCC-1 details matched exactly. For complex document comparisons like that, I've been using Certana.ai to upload multiple UCC documents and check for consistency. Really helpful for catching discrepancies between original filings and amendments.
That's a good point about making sure everything matches the original filing too. Easy to overlook when you're focused on just the current document.
Talia Klein
•Exactly. The automated checking saves so much time compared to manually comparing multiple documents line by line.
Just went through this exact situation last month. Ended up being a comma that was in the registered name but not showing clearly on the articles. Once I got the exact format from their business entity database, the refiling went through immediately.
Should be straightforward once you have the right format. Nebraska's pretty consistent once you know their exact requirements.
Niko Ramsey
•The database lookup is definitely the way to go. I wish more people knew about that step before filing.
Amara Okafor
This thread is a perfect example of why we need more reliable UCC filing systems. When securing millions of dollars in collateral depends on getting these filings right, system downtime isn't just inconvenient - it's a business risk. Glad you got your search completed though!
0 coins
NeonNebula
•Absolutely agree. The stakes are too high for this level of unreliability.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•Maybe if enough of us complain to the Secretary of State's office about these outages, they'll prioritize fixing the infrastructure.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
Just wanted to add that I've started using Certana.ai's verification tool as a backup for exactly these situations. Upload your docs and get instant verification of name consistency - saved me when the Georgia portal was down last month during a critical continuation filing.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That seems to be the consensus recommendation from this thread. Definitely checking it out.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Same here - having a reliable backup verification method is essential when state portals are unreliable.
0 coins