UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Luis Johnson

NJ SOS UCC search showing wrong debtor info - filing rejected twice

Running into a wall here with New Jersey Secretary of State UCC search results. Filed a UCC-1 last month for equipment financing deal, got it accepted, but now when I pull up the search results the debtor name is showing slightly different than what we actually filed. The search shows 'ABC Manufacturing Inc' but our original filing was for 'ABC Manufacturing, Inc.' - notice the comma difference. Now trying to file a UCC-3 amendment to update collateral description and SOS keeps rejecting it saying debtor name mismatch. Called their office twice, first person said the comma doesn't matter, second person said it absolutely does matter for amendments. This is holding up a $340K equipment refinancing and my client is getting antsy. Anyone dealt with NJ SOS UCC search inconsistencies like this? Do I need to file a completely new UCC-1 or is there a way to fix the original filing record?

Adrian Connor

•

Check if your original UCC-1 filing number is showing correctly in their system. Sometimes the debtor name display issue is linked to broader database problems that affect the whole record.

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

Filing number looks right, it's definitely just the name display that's off.

0 coins

Aisha Jackson

•

I deal with NJ UCC filings weekly and this comma issue comes up constantly. My advice: always file debtor names WITHOUT punctuation if possible. For your current situation, try filing the UCC-3 exactly as the name appears in the search results, not as you originally intended it.

0 coins

Aisha Jackson

•

You're right that's the catch-22. Legally correct vs. what the filing system will accept. Sometimes you have to choose practicality.

0 coins

Luis Johnson

•

This is exactly my dilemma. The legal name does have the comma according to the corporate registry.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

UCC Filing Complications with GSA Security Agreement - Name Mismatch Issues

Running into a roadblock with our UCC-1 filing tied to a GSA security agreement. We're trying to perfect our security interest in office equipment financed through a government contractor, but the debtor name on our security agreement shows "ABC Solutions LLC" while their GSA registration shows "ABC Solutions, Limited Liability Company." Filed the UCC-1 using the exact name from our security agreement, but now I'm second-guessing whether we should have matched the GSA format instead. The collateral description references "all office equipment purchased under GSA Schedule Contract GS-25F-0XXX" but I'm worried about enforceability if there's a name discrepancy between our security docs and their federal registration. Has anyone dealt with UCC filings where the underlying security agreement involves GSA contracts? The financing statement was accepted by the SOS, but our compliance team is nervous about the different name formats creating a gap in our lien position.

Gianna Scott

•

Update: ran the UCC search and found two other lenders filed against "ABC Solutions LLC" so it looks like that's the accepted format. Also checked their state registration and confirmed that's their official legal name. Feeling more confident about our filing now.

0 coins

Alfredo Lugo

•

Great news! That definitely gives you some comfort that you used the right name format.

0 coins

Sydney Torres

•

Smart to do that research. Always good to see how other lenders have handled the same debtor.

0 coins

For what it's worth, I had our team try that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty helpful for this kind of document cross-checking. We've been using it for our pre-filing reviews and it's caught several potential issues before they became problems. Worth considering if you're doing a lot of UCC filings with complex documentation.

0 coins

Caleb Bell

•

Good to know. We're always looking for ways to streamline our UCC filing process and reduce errors.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

Thanks for the feedback on that. I might give it a try on our next filing to see how it compares to our current manual review process.

0 coins

Anastasia Romanov

UCC Assignment Filing - Original Lender Won't Release Documents

Dealing with a complicated assignment of UCC situation here. We purchased a portfolio of equipment loans from a regional bank that's been acquired twice since the original UCC-1 filings were made in 2019-2021. The problem is we can't get proper assignment documentation from the original secured party because their legal department claims they don't have access to the old filing system records after the second acquisition. We've got about 47 UCC-1 filings that need proper assignment of UCC interests transferred to us as the new secured party, but without the original documents or proper chain of title, we're stuck. Has anyone dealt with assignment of UCC filings when the original lender basically disappeared through M&A activity? The debtors are current on payments but we need to perfect our security interests properly. Some of these are getting close to the 5-year continuation deadline and I'm worried we'll lose perfection entirely if we can't get the assignment of UCC documentation sorted out. Any advice on how to handle assignment of UCC when the trail goes cold?

This whole assignment of UCC mess is why we always require clean documentation as part of any loan purchase now. Too many headaches trying to sort out filing chains after the fact.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

Smart policy. We've learned the hard way that assignment of UCC issues only get worse with time.

0 coins

Liam McGuire

•

Update us on how this goes! I'm dealing with a smaller assignment of UCC situation and would love to know what approach works best when the original lender is uncooperative.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to move forward with the UCC-3 assignments based on the purchase agreement documentation and see what happens.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

That's probably your best bet. The assignment of UCC requirements are usually satisfied by proper purchase documentation even without the original lender's cooperation.

0 coins

Sarah Ali

UCC filing search showing weird results - am I missing something?

So I'm trying to do a UCC filing search on our borrower and the results are all over the place. I searched the exact debtor name from our loan docs and got like 3 different variations showing up - some with middle initials, some without, one with LLC spelled out vs just the abbreviation. The filing dates don't make sense either, showing stuff from 2019 that should have lapsed by now but still showing as active? Our compliance team is breathing down my neck about this loan package and I need to figure out what's actually on file. Has anyone else run into search results that just don't add up? I'm starting to wonder if I'm searching wrong or if there's something funky with the database.

Wesley Hallow

•

Quick question - are you searching as an exact match or using the broader search options? Sometimes the broad search picks up too much noise and makes it harder to identify what's actually relevant.

0 coins

Sarah Ali

•

I think I was using the broad search. Should I switch to exact match?

0 coins

Wesley Hallow

•

Try both. Exact match first to see the most relevant results, then broad search to make sure you're not missing anything.

0 coins

Avery Saint

•

Just to follow up on the continuation question - those 2019 filings could definitely still be active if they were properly continued. UCC-1 filings are effective for 5 years, so a 2019 filing would have lapsed in 2024 unless a UCC-3 continuation was filed within 6 months before the lapse date.

0 coins

Avery Saint

•

Exactly. The continuation would extend effectiveness until 2029.

0 coins

Ryan Vasquez

•

And if there's no continuation filed, those 2019 filings should show as lapsed in the search results.

0 coins

Mateo Hernandez

UCC-1 liens showing up wrong in my credit monitoring - debtor name issues?

I've been monitoring my business credit reports and noticed some UCC-1 liens that don't look right. The debtor names seem slightly off from my actual business registration. One shows 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but my legal name is 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' (with the comma). Another one has my old DBA name that I haven't used in 2 years. I'm worried these UCC-1 liens might not be properly perfected if the debtor names don't match exactly. I have equipment financing and an SBA loan, so there should be valid UCC-1 filings, but I want to make sure they're legally enforceable. Does anyone know how strict the debtor name matching requirements are for UCC-1 liens? Should I be concerned about these discrepancies or am I overthinking it?

Dmitry Popov

•

I used that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier when we were doing due diligence on an acquisition. Really helpful for catching inconsistencies between the target company's corporate docs and UCC filings. Saved us from assuming some liens were properly perfected when they actually had debtor name issues.

0 coins

That's exactly the kind of situation I want to avoid. Sounds like the document verification approach is worth trying.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

Yeah, just upload the PDFs and it flags potential problems. Much easier than trying to manually compare everything, especially when you have multiple UCC-1 filings to review.

0 coins

Ava Garcia

•

Update us on what you find when you check the official SOS records! Curious to know if it's actually filing errors or just credit report glitches.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to pull the official UCC records this week and compare them with our current business registration. Hopefully it's just credit report inaccuracies.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

Good luck! These debtor name issues can be stressful but they're usually fixable if you catch them early enough.

0 coins

Prev1...497498499500501...685Next