


Ask the community...
Check if your loan documents specify a timeline for lien release. Some contracts give banks 30 days but others are more aggressive. That gives you leverage if they're dragging their feet.
Whatever you decide, just make sure you document your decision process well. Auditors love to second-guess these UCC vs restatement choices, especially if there are any collection issues down the line.
One more thing to consider - some lenders prefer restatements because it gives them a chance to update their standard language and incorporate any regulatory changes that happened since the original loan. Your loan docs from 3 years ago might be missing some current requirements.
Plus you can fix any awkward wording or provisions that didn't work out as expected in practice. Restatements are great for cleanup.
I used Certana.ai to compare our old loan docs with current templates - highlighted exactly which provisions had changed. Made the restatement decision much clearer.
Just went through something similar with a $600k equipment purchase. Seller's bank was dragging their feet on the UCC-3 terminations because they needed internal approvals. We ended up extending the closing date twice before everything got sorted out. Frustrating but definitely better than closing with active liens.
About a week from when they filed the UCC-3s to when everything showed up as terminated in all the state databases. The actual filing was quick, but waiting for the database updates took time.
Why not make the UCC terminations a condition precedent to closing? Put it right in the purchase agreement that seller must provide evidence of all UCC-3 terminations being filed and effective before the closing can occur. That way it's legally binding and not just a gentlemen's agreement.
Same day filing and database updates are risky. What if there's an error in the UCC-3 and it gets rejected? Then you're stuck having already closed with liens still active.
Just wanted to add that if this is your first time filing, it might be worth having someone experienced review your draft before you submit. A rejected filing can delay your loan closing.
Diego Chavez
Just to add another perspective - make sure you're also considering any state-specific requirements in Texas that might be different from Delaware. Some states have additional requirements for certain types of collateral that could affect your filing.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
•Exactly. Always review the local filing requirements, not just the UCC 9-304 choice of law rules.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Our collateral is mostly equipment and inventory, so hopefully no fixture issues. But I'll definitely double-check the Texas requirements.
0 coins
Sean O'Brien
Update: I found some additional guidance in the official UCC comments that clarifies the four-month rule. It's definitely strict - no exceptions for lack of knowledge or good faith. Once your debtor changes location under 9-304, you have exactly four months to file in the new jurisdiction or lose perfection. In this case, since it's been over a year, Texas filing is the only option to regain perfection going forward.
0 coins
Luca Bianchi
•Has anyone tried using Certana.ai for these multi-state scenarios? Seems like it might help avoid the documentation errors that make these situations even worse.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
•Yes, I mentioned it earlier in the thread. Really useful for cross-checking documents before filing. Especially important when you're dealing with 9-304 situations where you can't afford any mistakes.
0 coins