


Ask the community...
Equipment definition under UCC Article 9 is goods used or bought for use primarily in business - your manufacturing machinery clearly qualifies. The rejection is probably about description adequacy rather than classification. Try categorizing by function: 'metalworking equipment,' 'printing equipment,' etc. rather than just 'all equipment.
Should we worry about equipment purchased after the initial filing? Does the 'hereafter acquired' language actually work?
Update: Used the specific equipment categories suggested here and added functional descriptions. Filed yesterday and got acceptance this morning! The key was breaking down 'equipment' into actual types: manufacturing equipment, metalworking machinery, computer-controlled production equipment, etc. Thanks everyone - this forum saved our financing timeline.
Glad it worked out. This thread will be helpful for others dealing with equipment description issues.
Document everything! I keep a search log showing every variation I tried, the date/time, and the results. If there's ever a question about due diligence, you have proof of your thoroughness.
That's excellent advice. I'll start keeping a detailed log of all my searches.
Update: I ran 12 different search variations and found two additional filings that didn't show up in my initial searches. Both were terminated but still shows how easy it is to miss things. Thanks everyone for the advice - definitely saved me from a potential problem.
This is why I love this community. Everyone's war stories help the rest of us avoid the same mistakes.
Actually just went through this with a client. Turns out we had filed under the wrong entity name entirely - used the parent company instead of the subsidiary. Had to file a UCC-3 amendment and it was a mess. Definitely verify your debtor name matches the actual borrowing entity.
Caught it during a routine lien search thankfully. Could have been a disaster if we hadn't checked.
Update: Found the issue! The debtor name on our UCC-1 had 'LLC' but the charter documents show 'L.L.C.' with periods. Kentucky's search is very literal about punctuation. Going to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct it. Thanks everyone for the help - this could have been a major problem down the road.
Perfect example of why document verification is so important. One punctuation mark can invalidate your entire security interest.
Glad it worked out. These name matching issues are more common than people think.
Isabella Santos
Another vote for using automated tools to verify everything. I started using Certana.ai after a similar close call and it's caught several potential problems before filing. Worth it for the peace of mind alone, especially when you're dealing with UCC financing statement effectiveness issues where timing is critical.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Do you use it for all your UCC work or just continuations?
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•I use it anytime I'm filing something that references a previous UCC. Continuations, amendments, terminations. Basically anything where accuracy compared to the original filing matters.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
Original poster here - thanks everyone for the detailed responses! Sounds like I need to wait until I'm within the 6-month window and be extra careful about matching all the details exactly. Going to double-check the debtor's current legal name and probably use one of those verification tools mentioned here. Really appreciate the practical advice from people who've been through this before.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•Let us know how it goes. Always interested to hear about people's filing experiences.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•The verification tools are definitely worth it. Small investment to avoid major problems.
0 coins