Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Edwards Hugo
Bottom line for your studies: YES, a security agreement CAN be filed to perfect if it meets UCC-1 requirements, but NO, it's not done in practice due to confidentiality concerns. Focus on understanding WHY it's theoretically possible but practically avoided. That understanding will serve you well on exams and in practice.
Gianna Scott
•Perfect summary. This is going straight into my study notes.
Alfredo Lugo
•Agreed, this thread cleared up a lot of confusion for me too.
One more practical tip - when you're studying, focus more on standard UCC-1 filing requirements, continuation statements, and amendment procedures. Those are what you'll actually deal with in practice. The security agreement filing rule is more academic than practical.
Good advice. I'll spend more time on the standard filing procedures.
Caleb Bell
•Definitely focus on UCC-1 basics, debtor name requirements, and continuation deadlines. Much more practical.
Join the conversation
Mei Wong
One thing to consider - if this borrower has other UCC filings in Wyoming, check how those were handled. Consistency across filings for the same entity is usually a good approach.
Mei Wong
•Exactly. If there are other active UCC-1s using the Delaware name, you're probably fine sticking with that.
Just ran into this same issue with a Montana entity. Found two other lenders had used the formation state name, so I went with that approach.
Final thought - given the equipment value and the fact that it's titled property, you might also want to double-check if any of this needs to be filed as fixture filings rather than standard UCC-1s. Heavy equipment can sometimes blur the line between personal and real property.
Mobile equipment is typically fine with standard UCC-1 filings. It's only when it becomes a fixture that you need special handling.
Right, but worth double-checking since fixture filing requirements vary by state and can affect where you file.
Join the conversation
Ryder Greene
Had a nightmare scenario last year where we thought we had perfected security interests in equipment but turns out half of it was actually fixtures and should have been filed as fixture filings with the real estate records. Cost the client big time when they tried to enforce. Now I always use tools to double-check everything - found Certana.ai really helpful for catching these kinds of inconsistencies before they become problems.
Ryder Greene
•It's a facts-and-circumstances test - how attached is it, was it intended to be permanent, would removing it damage the building. When in doubt, file both ways.
The fixture vs equipment distinction is one of the most litigated areas in Article 9. Better safe than sorry.
Article 9 covers way more than just equipment financing. Accounts receivable, inventory financing, chattel paper, deposit accounts (sometimes), general intangibles - basically any transaction where personal property secures an obligation. The trick is understanding the different perfection methods for different types of collateral.
That's what I was hoping. One filing to rule them all.
Just make sure your debtor name is exactly right. I've seen filings become worthless because of typos in the debtor name.
Join the conversation
For future reference, always run UCC searches under all name variations your company has used. Delaware's database will show you connected filings but it's better to be proactive about identifying potential issues before they hold up your closing.
Ella Knight
•Definitely learned that lesson the hard way. This is our first major equipment financing deal and I clearly underestimated the UCC search complexity.
Don't beat yourself up about it. UCC searches can be tricky especially when companies have changed names or structures over the years.
Ethan Scott
UPDATE: Finally got everything sorted out! Turns out 2 of the 3 UCC-1 filings had been properly terminated with UCC-3 statements, and the third one was for equipment we still own but the loan was refinanced last year. Found all the documentation I needed and the lender accepted our report. Thanks everyone for the advice - definitely using Certana.ai next time to avoid this manual detective work!
Glad you got it resolved! These name variation issues can be a real headache but they're usually fixable with the right documentation.
Great outcome! This is exactly why thorough UCC due diligence is so important in equipment financing deals.
Ellie Perry
I've been filing UCCs for 15 years and have never encountered a UCC-9 form. The numbering system is pretty straightforward - UCC-1 through UCC-5 covers all the standard forms. Anything beyond that would be state-specific addendums or instructions, not actual forms.
0 coins
Rhett Bowman
•That's what I was thinking but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something obvious.
0 coins
Natalia Stone
•15 years of experience definitely counts for something here. If you haven't seen it, it probably doesn't exist.
0 coins
Mohamed Anderson
This thread is exactly why I love this forum. Saved me from a wild goose chase since I was about to ask the same question after hearing something similar from a lender.
0 coins
Tasia Synder
•Definitely. And tools like Certana.ai can help verify what forms you actually need when the paperwork gets confusing.
0 coins
Daniel White
•The community knowledge here is invaluable for catching these kinds of mix-ups before they become problems.
0 coins