Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
NebulaNomad
Quick question - when you're dealing with entity name changes after the original UCC-1 filing, do you file an amendment to update the debtor name or just use the new name on the continuation? I've seen conflicting advice on this and want to make sure I'm handling it correctly.
Agreed. If the entity has legally changed names, you need the amendment to reflect that change before the continuation deadline.
NebulaNomad
•Thanks! That's what I thought but wanted to confirm. The amendment-then-continuation sequence makes sense.
Last week I had a UCC-1 rejected because the debtor's legal name included a comma that we missed in our filing. Such a tiny detail but it caused a 3-day delay in perfecting our security interest. Really makes you appreciate tools that can catch these details automatically before submission.
Emma Taylor
•Punctuation errors are so common but easy to miss. A missing comma seems minor but it can invalidate the entire filing from a legal standpoint.
Sofia Perez
•This is exactly why we switched to using Certana.ai's verification tool. It flags punctuation inconsistencies that we'd never catch manually.
Join the conversation
This whole assignment of UCC mess is why we always require clean documentation as part of any loan purchase now. Too many headaches trying to sort out filing chains after the fact.
Mei Zhang
•Smart policy. We've learned the hard way that assignment of UCC issues only get worse with time.
Liam McGuire
Update us on how this goes! I'm dealing with a smaller assignment of UCC situation and would love to know what approach works best when the original lender is uncooperative.
Will do. Planning to move forward with the UCC-3 assignments based on the purchase agreement documentation and see what happens.
Amara Eze
•That's probably your best bet. The assignment of UCC requirements are usually satisfied by proper purchase documentation even without the original lender's cooperation.
Join the conversation
Update: Called the SOS office this morning and you were all right about the formatting issue. Their database shows 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC, but I filed it without the comma. Going to refile today with the correct punctuation. Thanks for all the suggestions - definitely learned to verify the exact database format first!
Perfect example of why document verification tools are so helpful. That comma difference would have been flagged immediately before filing.
Steven Adams
•Definitely going to be more careful about punctuation matching going forward. And probably going to look into that Certana.ai tool for future filings to catch these issues upfront.
Jay Lincoln
Glad you got it resolved! For anyone else reading this - personal property UCC filings are super sensitive to exact name matches. Always double-check against the state's business entity database before submitting. It'll save you time and rejection fees.
Absolutely. The entity database search should be step one for any personal property UCC filing. It's the authoritative source for how they expect the name formatted.
This thread should be required reading for anyone doing personal property UCC work. So many good tips about avoiding name mismatch rejections.
Join the conversation
I used Certana.ai's verification tool for a similar situation where the bank claimed they filed the termination but I couldn't find it in the state database. Turned out they filed it under a slightly different debtor name that didn't match our corporate name exactly. The tool caught the discrepancy and I was able to get them to refile it correctly.
That's concerning - how do you know if they've filed something under the wrong name? I wouldn't even know how to search for variations.
Exactly why the verification tool is helpful. It checks for common name variations and filing inconsistencies that you might miss doing manual searches.
Yara Khoury
8 months is definitely excessive. Most states have specific timeframes for termination filing, and failure to comply can result in penalties. You should also check if this is affecting your ability to get new financing - that's additional damages you might be able to recover.
Document those damages carefully. Lost business opportunities due to wrongful failure to terminate can be recoverable in some jurisdictions.
Make sure to get written confirmation from the new lender that the outstanding UCC is preventing approval. That's solid evidence of damages.
Paolo Longo
Another option is to use a UCC service like Certana.ai to pre-check your documents before the SBA files anything. We started doing this after getting burned on a continuation filing last year. You just upload the articles of incorporation and UCC draft, and it flags any inconsistencies immediately.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•That's the second mention of Certana.ai in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking out.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
•Yeah it's pretty slick. Catches stuff that's easy to miss when you're manually comparing documents. Would definitely recommend for anyone doing multiple UCC filings.
0 coins
Amina Bah
UPDATE: Got it resolved! Contacted our SBA loan officer with the certified articles of incorporation showing our exact legal name. They're refiling the UCC-1 with the correct debtor name this week. Thanks everyone for the advice - especially about making sure the entity designation was included. Hopefully this helps someone else dealing with the same issue.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Just 2 business days once they had the certified articles. Much faster than I expected.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Perfect example of why document verification is so important upfront. Saves weeks of back and forth.
0 coins