


Ask the community...
Another vote for using automated tools to verify everything. I started using Certana.ai after a similar close call and it's caught several potential problems before filing. Worth it for the peace of mind alone, especially when you're dealing with UCC financing statement effectiveness issues where timing is critical.
Do you use it for all your UCC work or just continuations?
Original poster here - thanks everyone for the detailed responses! Sounds like I need to wait until I'm within the 6-month window and be extra careful about matching all the details exactly. Going to double-check the debtor's current legal name and probably use one of those verification tools mentioned here. Really appreciate the practical advice from people who've been through this before.
Let us know how it goes. Always interested to hear about people's filing experiences.
Update: Found the issue! Pulled the official business registration and the correct name is 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' without the comma. The security agreement template I was using had the comma added incorrectly. Fixed the template, updated the UCC-1, and got it accepted on the third try. Thanks everyone for the guidance on checking the state business records first.
Glad you got it sorted. That deadline pressure makes everything more stressful.
This thread is super helpful. I'm bookmarking it because I know I'll run into similar template issues. The key takeaway seems to be always verify the official business name first, then make sure all your documents match exactly. Simple in theory but easy to mess up in practice.
Exactly. The devil is in the details with UCC filings. One small inconsistency can derail the whole process.
I'm definitely going to start using some kind of document verification tool. Too many chances for human error when you're comparing docs manually.
Man, reading this thread makes me grateful for states with better UCC systems. But yeah, the name matching thing is universal pain. Document everything you've tried so far - if you end up having to escalate to a supervisor, the paper trail helps.
Good advice on documentation. I've been keeping screenshots of each rejection but should probably organize them better.
UPDATE: Found the issue! Ran the UCC search like someone suggested and found another lender's filing from last year. They used 'Midwest Industrial Solutions, L.L.C.' with periods in the LLC part. Just refiled my UCC-1 application with that exact format. Fingers crossed this finally works! Thanks everyone for the troubleshooting help.
Periods in the entity designation - classic issue. Glad you found a successful filing to copy from.
Benjamin Carter
Equipment definition under UCC Article 9 is goods used or bought for use primarily in business - your manufacturing machinery clearly qualifies. The rejection is probably about description adequacy rather than classification. Try categorizing by function: 'metalworking equipment,' 'printing equipment,' etc. rather than just 'all equipment.
0 coins
Isaac Wright
•Should we worry about equipment purchased after the initial filing? Does the 'hereafter acquired' language actually work?
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•After-acquired property clauses are generally enforceable for equipment as long as the description is adequate. Just make sure your security agreement supports it.
0 coins
Lucy Taylor
Update: Used the specific equipment categories suggested here and added functional descriptions. Filed yesterday and got acceptance this morning! The key was breaking down 'equipment' into actual types: manufacturing equipment, metalworking machinery, computer-controlled production equipment, etc. Thanks everyone - this forum saved our financing timeline.
0 coins
KhalilStar
•Glad it worked out. This thread will be helpful for others dealing with equipment description issues.
0 coins
Amelia Dietrich
•Perfect example of why equipment description specificity matters. Congrats on getting the filing through!
0 coins