UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

This whole assignment of UCC mess is why we always require clean documentation as part of any loan purchase now. Too many headaches trying to sort out filing chains after the fact.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

Smart policy. We've learned the hard way that assignment of UCC issues only get worse with time.

0 coins

Liam McGuire

•

Update us on how this goes! I'm dealing with a smaller assignment of UCC situation and would love to know what approach works best when the original lender is uncooperative.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to move forward with the UCC-3 assignments based on the purchase agreement documentation and see what happens.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

That's probably your best bet. The assignment of UCC requirements are usually satisfied by proper purchase documentation even without the original lender's cooperation.

0 coins

Update: Called the SOS office this morning and you were all right about the formatting issue. Their database shows 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC, but I filed it without the comma. Going to refile today with the correct punctuation. Thanks for all the suggestions - definitely learned to verify the exact database format first!

0 coins

Perfect example of why document verification tools are so helpful. That comma difference would have been flagged immediately before filing.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

Definitely going to be more careful about punctuation matching going forward. And probably going to look into that Certana.ai tool for future filings to catch these issues upfront.

0 coins

Jay Lincoln

•

Glad you got it resolved! For anyone else reading this - personal property UCC filings are super sensitive to exact name matches. Always double-check against the state's business entity database before submitting. It'll save you time and rejection fees.

0 coins

Absolutely. The entity database search should be step one for any personal property UCC filing. It's the authoritative source for how they expect the name formatted.

0 coins

This thread should be required reading for anyone doing personal property UCC work. So many good tips about avoiding name mismatch rejections.

0 coins

StarSailor

•

For what it's worth, I've had good luck with adding 'now owned or hereafter acquired' to the end of my collateral descriptions. Covers future assets without being too vague about current ones.

0 coins

That's a nice touch. Probably important for a line of credit where they'll be buying new equipment.

0 coins

Amara Chukwu

•

Good addition. Just make sure your security agreement supports after-acquired property clauses.

0 coins

Update: refiled with the detailed collateral description and it went through without any issues. Thanks everyone for the help! Definitely learned my lesson about being more specific upfront.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Glad it worked out! These filing requirements are a pain but they make sense once you understand the reasoning.

0 coins

NeonNova

•

Great outcome. This thread was really helpful for understanding the collateral description requirements.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

Make sure you're not running into a debtor name issue disguised as a collateral description problem. I've seen SOS offices give generic rejection reasons when the real issue is the debtor name not matching their business records exactly. Double-check that your debtor name on the UCC-1 matches exactly what's on file with the Secretary of State for the farming operation.

0 coins

Caesar Grant

•

Definitely worth checking. Sometimes the LLC registration might be "Johnson Family Farms, LLC" with a comma, or "Johnson Family Farm" without the 's'. Even small differences can cause rejections that get blamed on collateral descriptions.

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

This is where I'd use Certana.ai again - you can upload the UCC-1 and it checks debtor name consistency against business registrations. Saves you from guessing what variation might be causing the rejection.

0 coins

Gemma Andrews

•

Farm products filings are definitely more art than science. I've had success with really comprehensive descriptions like "All farm products of every kind and description, whether now existing or hereafter acquired, including without limitation: (a) crops, whether planted, growing, or harvested; (b) livestock of every kind; (c) supplies used or produced in farming operations; (d) products of crops or livestock; and (e) all proceeds, whether cash or non-cash, from the sale, lease, license, exchange or other disposition of any of the foregoing." It's verbose but it works.

0 coins

Rita Jacobs

•

This is really helpful. Going to try a comprehensive description like this for our next filing attempt. Really appreciate everyone's input - this has been way more complex than our lender made it sound.

0 coins

Pedro Sawyer

•

Yeah agricultural lending has all these nuances that don't apply to regular commercial loans. Good luck with the refiling!

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Update us when you get it sorted out! I'm curious to know what the exact issue was with the name formatting.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

Will do! Hoping to get this resolved by end of week.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Fingers crossed. Name issues are so frustrating but usually easy to fix once you know exactly what's wrong.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Just remember you need to refile the UCC-1 entirely, not just submit a correction. Some people think they can just send in the corrected name but you need a whole new filing.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Yeah, UCC-3 amendments are for changes after acceptance. Rejections require completely new UCC-1 filings.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Exactly right. Don't confuse a rejection with an accepted filing that needs amendment later.

0 coins

Prev1...503504505506507...685Next