


Ask the community...
One thing to watch out for - make sure you're searching all the right jurisdictions. If the company does business in multiple states, there could be UCC filings in other states too. The equipment location might determine where liens need to be filed.
Good point. Equipment can be tricky because it can move between states and filing requirements vary.
Usually you search where the debtor is organized/located, but for equipment it can get complicated if it moves around.
Bottom line - don't take the seller's word for it that these are all just 'incorrect names.' Do your own verification through official records, get copies of the actual filings, and consider professional help if the amounts are significant. Better to be overly cautious than miss something important.
Absolutely agree. I've seen too many deals go sideways because someone assumed name variations were harmless.
Yeah, and even if they are the same entity, you still need to deal with the liens before the purchase. Name verification is just the first step.
Once you get the debtor name sorted out, double-check that your secured party information matches exactly what the SBA lender provided too. That's another common source of rejections that people overlook.
Good reminder. The lender gave me their exact name and address for the secured party section so I should be good there.
Make sure you use their legal entity name, not just their DBA or trade name for the secured party too.
Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious to hear how these debtor name issues get sorted out.
Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow with the exact legal name format from the state database.
Hope it goes through this time. These UCC name matching rules are such a pain.
The security agreement format requirements can be really picky depending on your state. Some states are more forgiving than others when it comes to minor name variations. Have you checked if your state has specific formatting guidelines for UCC filings? That might help you figure out exactly what format they're expecting.
UPDATE: I figured it out! The issue was that our security agreement had 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but the state registration actually shows 'Midwest Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma before LLC. Such a tiny difference but it was enough to cause the rejection. Thanks everyone for the help - I'm resubmitting with the correct format now.
This is exactly why I always double-check the state database before submitting any UCC filings. Those little details matter so much.
Follow up on the document verification - it really helped me identify the exact issue. Once I knew the debtor name mismatch was the problem, SBA fixed it within 2 weeks. Before that I was just spinning my wheels for months.
Will do. Thanks everyone for the advice - gives me a clear action plan now.
Sofia Hernandez
Another vote for document verification before filing. Used Certana.ai on a similar multi-lender deal and it caught a debtor name discrepancy between the mortgage and UCC docs that would have caused major headaches.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•These name matching issues are brutal. One small difference and suddenly your UCC filing doesn't perfect your security interest.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•The verification tools are worth it just for peace of mind. Upload everything and let it check for inconsistencies automatically.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
Bottom line - make sure the equipment lender knows they're taking subordinate position to existing mortgage for fixture value, but they should have priority for any removable value. Price and structure the deal accordingly.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
•That makes sense. I'll make sure both lenders understand the priority structure before we move forward. Thanks everyone for the detailed explanations.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Smart approach. Better to have everyone's expectations aligned upfront than deal with surprises later.
0 coins