Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Filing the amendment is smart but also document everything for your lender file. Keep copies of the original UCC-1, the amendment, and the GA SOS records showing the correct name. If this ever gets questioned later you'll have a clear paper trail.
Smart practice. I always keep a complete filing history for each deal in case issues come up later.
Exactly. Better to over-document than try to reconstruct the timeline years later.
Thanks for posting this! I'm dealing with a similar situation in GA and this thread has been super helpful. Going to file my amendment tomorrow before I get too close to my continuation deadline.
Glad it helped! Better to be proactive about these things.
Good call. GA name matching issues are common but totally fixable if you catch them in time.
Join the conversation
Connecticut is actually better than some states I've dealt with. At least their online portal is functional and up-to-date. Some states still require paper searches or have systems that go down constantly.
That's somewhat reassuring. I was starting to think CT was particularly difficult.
No, CT is decent. The debtor name issue you're facing is pretty universal across all states. It's just the nature of UCC searches.
Final thought - consider getting a professional UCC search company to run a comprehensive search if this is a significant purchase. They have experience with debtor name variations and know the common pitfalls in each state.
There are several good ones, but honestly I've been impressed with Certana.ai's verification tool. You can upload your own search results and it cross-checks everything automatically. Might be faster and cheaper than hiring a search company.
Second the recommendation for getting professional help on complex searches. The cost is usually worth it compared to the risk of missing something important.
Join the conversation
Has anyone tried reaching out to the Colorado Secretary of State office about this? Seems like they should know their system is showing incomplete results.
Typical government response. Just pass the liability to us.
So we're supposed to just guess what liens might exist? This is insane.
I think your best bet is to assume the highest number of liens you found is probably closest to accurate and investigate each one individually. Pull the actual filing documents for each lien to see what they cover and when they expire. That's the only way to get a complete picture in Colorado.
Welcome to Colorado UCC searches. They're all like this unfortunately.
This is exactly why tools like Certana.ai are so useful - you can upload all those individual documents and it will automatically organize them and flag any issues or gaps.
Join the conversation
Check if there are any special characters in the company name that might not be displaying properly. Sometimes there are hidden characters or non-standard punctuation that cause matching issues.
How do you even detect something like that?
Copy the name from the DOS record and paste it directly into your UCC-1 form. Don't retype it.
UPDATE: Finally got it resolved! The issue was that the LLC was administratively dissolved last month but still showing as active in some searches. Had to wait for the company to reinstate before the UCC-1 would accept. Thanks everyone for the help - definitely using document verification tools going forward to catch these issues earlier.
Great outcome! Which verification tool did you end up using?
Tried Certana.ai after it was mentioned here - caught the entity status issue immediately. Wish I'd known about it sooner.
Angelina Farar
Washington's system has been weird lately. I noticed they changed something in their search interface and now it seems less forgiving with name variations. Might be worth calling their UCC department directly to ask about best practices for your specific debtor name.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Good idea. I should probably just bite the bullet and call them tomorrow. Thanks for all the suggestions everyone - this has been really helpful.
0 coins
Sebastián Stevens
•Their staff is actually pretty helpful when you can get through to someone. Good luck with your deal!
0 coins
Bethany Groves
For future reference, I always run at least 5-6 different name variations on any significant deal. Full legal name, abbreviated versions, with/without punctuation, with/without entity type designation. Takes extra time but catches things the basic search misses.
0 coins
Bethany Groves
•Yep, I have a template I use. Happy to share if anyone wants it - just basic stuff but it helps ensure I don't miss obvious variations.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
•I'd love to see that template if you don't mind sharing!
0 coins