UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Connor O'Reilly

•

Similar thing happened to me but with LLC vs L.L.C. punctuation. Turned out the state had changed how they format business names in their system but hadn't updated their search function. Sometimes you have to call the filing office directly to figure out their exact formatting requirements.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

Good point about calling the office. The staff there usually know about any recent system changes or formatting quirks.

0 coins

Yuki Yamamoto

•

I might do that just to be 100% sure before I refile. Can't afford another rejection at this point.

0 coins

Yara Khoury

•

Update us when you get it sorted! These vehicle security agreement issues come up all the time and it's helpful to know how different states handle the refiling situation. Hope the timing works out okay for your deal.

0 coins

Yuki Yamamoto

•

Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow morning with the exact charter name. Fingers crossed this one goes through.

0 coins

Keisha Taylor

•

Good luck! These name matching issues are such a pain but at least it's fixable.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

just had same problem with ma filing last week. turned out the llc had an old dba on file that was confusing the system. check if harbor view has any old assumed names or dbas that might be interfering

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

yeah ma keeps all that stuff in their database even if its expired. really annoying

0 coins

Keisha Williams

•

Massachusetts really needs to update their systems. This kind of stuff shouldn't be so complicated in 2025.

0 coins

Final thought - if all else fails and you're really pressed for time, some attorneys will file these as a service and they usually have workarounds for the common portal issues. Costs more but might be worth it for a $180K equipment financing deal.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Yeah, might have to go that route if I can't figure this out by tomorrow. Really frustrating though - should be a simple filing.

0 coins

I agree it should be simpler, but unfortunately Massachusetts hasn't modernized their UCC system as much as other states. The manual verification process they use creates a lot of these edge cases.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

Quick question - do the different UCC sections vary by state or is it uniform? Our equipment will be in multiple states so wondering if I need to research each state's version.

0 coins

For multi-state equipment, you'll need to figure out which state's law governs the filing. Usually it's where the debtor is located but there are exceptions.

0 coins

Fatima Al-Farsi

•

Louisiana doesn't follow the UCC at all - they have their own system. But that's the only state that's completely different.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Bottom line for your situation: focus on Article 9, understand the basic definitions from Article 1, and make sure your lender is filing the UCC-1 correctly with exact name matches and proper collateral descriptions. The other UCC sections won't really impact your equipment financing deal unless you're also doing sales, leases, or other transactions covered by different articles.

0 coins

Dmitry Smirnov

•

Same here. Article 9 for secured transactions, got it. Thanks everyone!

0 coins

ElectricDreamer

•

Make sure to double-check those filings before they go in. Name mistakes are expensive to fix later.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Have you considered having your attorney file the termination? Sometimes law firms have better luck with the state systems, and for an $850K collateral situation, the legal fees might be worth avoiding any potential liability issues.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Totally understand. But with equipment refinancing on the line, sometimes it's better to pay the attorney fees upfront rather than risk delays or mistakes.

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

I always use our corporate attorney for UCC filings over $500K. The liability protection alone is worth the extra cost.

0 coins

One more thing to check - make sure you're using the current UCC-3 form version. Florida updated their forms last year and the old versions get auto-rejected now. The form should be dated 2024 or later.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

I downloaded the form directly from the Florida SOS website, so it should be current. But I'll double-check the version date.

0 coins

Good. Also make sure you're selecting 'termination' rather than 'partial release' - I've seen people use the wrong termination type by mistake.

0 coins

Connor Richards

•

I've found that running the same UCC-11 search multiple times in Florida sometimes gives slightly different results - their system seems to have some lag between updates. Try searching again tomorrow and see if you get consistent results.

0 coins

Grace Durand

•

I've noticed this too - seems like their database updates overnight sometimes.

0 coins

Steven Adams

•

This is why I always save PDF copies of search results with timestamps for my files.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

Update on my earlier Certana.ai suggestion - just used it again this week for a Florida deal and it caught a debtor name mismatch between the UCC-11 results and the actual UCC-1 filing that would have caused problems at closing. Really streamlined the verification process.

0 coins

Hunter Edmunds

•

That's exactly the kind of issue I'm worried about missing. Going to try uploading my search results and see what it finds.

0 coins

Alice Fleming

•

Good idea - it's especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple filings and need to verify they all relate to your specific collateral.

0 coins

Prev1...485486487488489...685Next