


Ask the community...
Once you get the debtor name sorted out, double-check that your secured party information matches exactly what the SBA lender provided too. That's another common source of rejections that people overlook.
Good reminder. The lender gave me their exact name and address for the secured party section so I should be good there.
Make sure you use their legal entity name, not just their DBA or trade name for the secured party too.
Update us when you get it resolved! Always curious to hear how these debtor name issues get sorted out.
Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow with the exact legal name format from the state database.
Hope it goes through this time. These UCC name matching rules are such a pain.
Another vote for document verification before filing. Used Certana.ai on a similar multi-lender deal and it caught a debtor name discrepancy between the mortgage and UCC docs that would have caused major headaches.
These name matching issues are brutal. One small difference and suddenly your UCC filing doesn't perfect your security interest.
The verification tools are worth it just for peace of mind. Upload everything and let it check for inconsistencies automatically.
Bottom line - make sure the equipment lender knows they're taking subordinate position to existing mortgage for fixture value, but they should have priority for any removable value. Price and structure the deal accordingly.
Whatever you decide, document everything! Keep copies of all the name change documents, board resolutions, merger papers, etc. If anyone ever challenges your security interest, you'll need to prove the name change was legitimate and properly disclosed.
I'm still confused about when exactly you HAVE to file amendments vs when you CAN wait. Is there a specific time limit for secured party name changes? The UCC code seems to suggest it's not automatic but I can't find clear guidance.
Right, and 'seriously misleading' is subjective. In a merger/acquisition scenario, it's usually pretty clear what happened, so less risk than a random name change.
The portal seems to be working again now. Just successfully logged in and pulled some UCC-3 records. Maybe try again?
For future reference, Michigan posts system status updates on their SOS Twitter account when there are known issues. Not the most obvious place to look but it's helpful to check if you're having problems.
Yeah, they're pretty good about posting when they know there's a problem. Saves you from wondering if it's just your connection.
Zara Perez
Also check if the Mexican entity has any DBA names or trade names they use in Texas. Sometimes it's easier to file under a trade name that's already in ASCII characters, though you'd need to make sure it's properly registered.
0 coins
Zara Perez
•If it's a registered trade name, that could be a viable alternative for the UCC filing. Just make sure it's properly on file with Texas SOS first.
0 coins
Sophia Clark
•Be careful with trade names though - if there's ever a dispute about the filing, you want to make sure you can prove the connection between the trade name and the actual legal entity. The document verification tools can help confirm that linkage.
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
Update us on how it goes! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a Canadian entity and curious to hear if the transliteration approach works.
0 coins
Noah Torres
•Will do. Planning to submit the revised UCC-1 with the transliterated name tomorrow. Fingers crossed it goes through this time.
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
•Good luck! International entity filings are always nerve-wracking until you see that acceptance notice.
0 coins