UCC-1 addendum causing rejection - collateral description overflow issue
Running into a wall here with our equipment financing UCC-1 that keeps getting rejected by the SOS office. The collateral description is too long for the main form and we need to use an addendum but apparently we're doing something wrong with the formatting. This is for a $2.8M construction equipment lease and we can't afford to have the lien unperfected due to a paperwork screwup. The debtor name matches exactly but the rejection notice mentions something about the addendum not being properly referenced on the main UCC-1 form. Has anyone dealt with collateral descriptions that require a UCC-1 addendum? The equipment list is extensive (excavators, bulldozers, compactors, etc.) and there's no way it fits in the standard collateral field. Really need to get this filed correctly before our internal deadline.
37 comments
Join the conversation
Libby Hassan
I've seen this exact issue before. When you're using a UCC-1 addendum for collateral descriptions, you need to specifically reference it in the main form's collateral field. Something like 'See attached addendum for complete collateral description' or similar language. The SOS systems are picky about this cross-reference.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•We did put a reference but maybe our wording wasn't specific enough. Do you know the exact language that works best?
0 coins
Libby Hassan
•I usually use 'All collateral described in UCC-1 Addendum attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference' - that's worked consistently for me across different states.
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
Check your addendum formatting too. Each addendum page needs to have the filing number reference and debtor info at the top. Also make sure you're checking the 'addendum' box on the main UCC-1 form itself - that's a common miss.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Good point about the checkbox. Let me double-check that on our form.
0 coins
Sofia Peña
•Yes! The addendum checkbox is critical. I missed that once and got a rejection even though everything else was perfect.
0 coins
Aaron Boston
honestly this stuff is so finicky, I started using Certana.ai's document checker after getting burned on a similar filing. You just upload your UCC-1 and addendum PDFs and it verifies everything cross-references correctly before you submit. Caught several issues for me that would have caused rejections.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Never heard of that service. Does it actually check the addendum references specifically?
0 coins
Aaron Boston
•Yeah it does a full consistency check between the main form and any addendums. Really helpful for complex filings like equipment leases where you have multiple documents.
0 coins
Libby Hassan
•That actually sounds useful. Manual checking of these cross-references is tedious and error-prone.
0 coins
Sophia Carter
What state are you filing in? Some states have specific requirements for how the addendum needs to be formatted and attached. The reference language can vary by jurisdiction too.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Filing in a state that uses the standard UCC forms, but maybe there are local quirks I'm missing.
0 coins
Sophia Carter
•Even with standard forms, some SOS offices are stricter about addendum formatting. Worth checking their specific instructions.
0 coins
Chloe Zhang
UGH this is exactly why I hate these addendum filings! The systems are so inconsistent about what they accept. I've had the same exact formatting work in one state and get rejected in another. It's like they make up the rules as they go along!!
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
•I feel your pain. The lack of standardization is really frustrating when you're dealing with multi-state filings.
0 coins
Chloe Zhang
•Right?! And then you're racing against lapse dates while they take their sweet time processing corrections.
0 coins
Brandon Parker
Make sure your collateral description on the addendum is specific enough too. 'Construction equipment' might not cut it - you may need individual serial numbers or at least detailed categories. That could be another reason for rejection.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Our description is pretty detailed with model numbers and serial numbers where available. That part should be solid.
0 coins
Brandon Parker
•Good, that's usually the right approach for equipment financing. The cross-reference issue is probably your main problem then.
0 coins
Sofia Peña
•Serial numbers are definitely the way to go for equipment. Learned that the hard way on a previous filing.
0 coins
Adriana Cohn
we had same problem last month with addendum, turns out we forgot to put continuation checkbox or something like that. check all your boxes carefully before resubmitting
0 coins
Libby Hassan
•Wait, this is an initial UCC-1 filing, not a continuation. Different checkbox requirements.
0 coins
Adriana Cohn
•oh right my bad, was thinking of our continuation that got messed up
0 coins
Jace Caspullo
I always triple-check the page numbering on addendums too. Each page needs to be clearly marked as part of the filing and reference the main UCC-1. Page 1 of 3, Page 2 of 3, etc. Seems obvious but it's easy to overlook.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•That's a good point. We have multiple pages of equipment listings so proper pagination is important.
0 coins
Jace Caspullo
•Exactly. And make sure the debtor name appears consistently across all pages of the addendum.
0 coins
Melody Miles
Another thing to verify - are you using the current version of the UCC-1 addendum form? Some states updated their forms recently and won't accept older versions even if they look identical.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Good catch. We downloaded ours a few months ago so it might be worth getting a fresh copy.
0 coins
Melody Miles
•Yeah, always worth downloading fresh forms for important filings. The version dates are usually in small print at the bottom.
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
•This happened to us once. Form looked identical but was an older revision and got rejected.
0 coins
Nathaniel Mikhaylov
For what it's worth, I've had success with Certana.ai's UCC checker on addendum filings too. It caught an issue where our main form didn't properly cross-reference the addendum pages. Saved us from another rejection cycle.
0 coins
Levi Parker
•Seems like multiple people have had good experiences with that service. Might be worth trying for peace of mind.
0 coins
Aaron Boston
•Yeah, especially for complex filings like this where there are multiple documents that need to align perfectly.
0 coins
Eva St. Cyr
UPDATE: Fixed the issue! It was exactly what several people mentioned - we needed more specific language in the main form referencing the addendum. Used the wording someone suggested about 'incorporated herein by reference' and also made sure the addendum checkbox was marked. Filed this morning and got acceptance confirmation within 2 hours. Thanks everyone for the help!
0 coins
Libby Hassan
•Great news! Glad the reference language worked for you.
0 coins
Hunter Hampton
•Awesome! Those quick acceptance confirmations are such a relief when you're dealing with tight deadlines.
0 coins
Chloe Zhang
•Finally a success story! Nice to know the system actually works when you get all the details right.
0 coins