< Back to UCC Document Community

Zoe Alexopoulos

UCC filing rejected - promissory note and security agreement form mismatch with debtor name

Our bank's UCC-1 filing got rejected yesterday and I'm trying to figure out what went wrong. The promissory note and security agreement form we prepared show the borrower as "JMK Industries LLC" but our UCC-1 lists "JMK Industries, LLC" (with the comma). The SOS rejection notice says debtor name doesn't match exactly with the organizational documents we referenced. This is a $340,000 equipment loan and we can't afford to have an unperfected security interest. Has anyone dealt with this exact comma issue before? The borrower's articles of incorporation show "JMK Industries LLC" without comma, but some of their other business docs have it with comma. Really need to get this sorted fast since we're already 5 days into the filing window.

Jamal Carter

•

Ugh this is such a common problem! The exact name match requirement is super strict. You need to pull the actual charter documents from the state and use EXACTLY what's on file there. Even punctuation matters unfortunately.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Yep, learned this the hard way on a $200K filing last year. Had to refile three times because of name variations.

0 coins

Wait so which name should they use - the one on the promissory note or the charter?

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

Check the secretary of state database for the exact legal name. That's what needs to be on your UCC-1, not whatever version is on the promissory note and security agreement form. The loan docs can have variations but the UCC has to match the official registration exactly.

0 coins

Thanks - I looked it up and the official registration shows "JMK Industries LLC" without comma. So our loan paperwork was actually correct but somehow the UCC prep got the comma added in.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

That happens more often than you'd think. Document prep software sometimes auto-adds punctuation. Double-check your UCC prep process.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

This is exactly why I always do a final cross-check between all the documents before filing. Too many ways for small errors to creep in.

0 coins

Had this exact issue last month! What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You just upload your promissory note, security agreement, and UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly flags any name mismatches between documents. Would have caught this comma issue immediately instead of waiting for the rejection.

0 coins

Never heard of that service - does it check against the actual state database too or just compare your documents to each other?

0 coins

It compares all your documents to each other to make sure they're consistent. So it would catch when your UCC says one thing but your security agreement says another. Super helpful for avoiding these costly mistakes.

0 coins

The promissory note and security agreement form details don't matter for UCC purposes - only the actual legal entity name matters. But you definitely want consistency across all your loan documents for other reasons.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

True but if there's a discrepancy it could signal a deeper problem with the loan documentation that needs fixing.

0 coins

Good point. Better to have everything align perfectly than try to explain variations later.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

Yeah and some auditors will flag any inconsistencies even if they're technically not required to match exactly.

0 coins

This is why I hate the UCC system sometimes. A single comma can void your entire security interest and there's no grace period or common sense interpretation. The rules are so rigid.

0 coins

It's frustrating but the strict rules do serve a purpose - makes the public record more reliable for searches.

0 coins

I guess but when a typo can cost you hundreds of thousands in collateral protection it seems excessive.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

Are you sure the rejection was just about the comma? Sometimes they bundle multiple issues in one rejection notice. Check if there were any other problems with the filing.

0 coins

Good catch - let me reread the rejection notice more carefully. Sometimes they're not super clear about what the actual issue is.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

Yeah I've seen rejections that mention the debtor name issue first but then list other problems buried in the text.

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

Also check your collateral description - that's another common rejection reason that gets overlooked.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Quick question - did you verify the exact name on the promissory note and security agreement form matches what the borrower actually uses in their business operations? Sometimes companies use different variations informally.

0 coins

Yeah we did verify that. The borrower has been consistent with using the no-comma version. It was definitely an error on our UCC prep side.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

At least that's one less thing to worry about then. Should be a straightforward refile once you get the name corrected.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

I always triple-check entity names now after getting burned on a similar issue. It's such a pain but these strict matching requirements aren't going anywhere.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Same here. I actually keep a checklist now of all the name verification steps before any UCC filing.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

Smart approach. The extra 10 minutes of verification beats dealing with rejection delays and refiling fees.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Plus the stress of knowing your lien might not be perfected while you're fixing the error.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Just file the correction ASAP. The good news is that once you get the name right, the rest of your filing info was probably fine if this was the only rejection reason listed.

0 coins

Yeah that's the plan. Already prepared the corrected version with the exact name from the state database. Should submit it tomorrow.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Good. And maybe implement some kind of document review process to catch these issues before filing in the future.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

This thread is exactly why I started using automated verification tools for UCC filings. The Certana.ai document checker I mentioned earlier has saved me from at least 3 similar mistakes this year. Worth checking out if you do a lot of these filings - just upload all your documents and it flags any inconsistencies instantly.

0 coins

Is that expensive? We don't do tons of UCC filings but when we do mess up it's costly.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

The verification service is pretty reasonable considering what a rejected filing costs you in time and potential risk. Definitely worth it for the peace of mind.

0 coins

Agreed - I wish I'd found it sooner. Would have saved me several headaches like this one.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

Update us when you get the corrected filing accepted! Always good to know these stories have happy endings.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to file the correction tomorrow morning. Fingers crossed it goes through without any other issues.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

Should be smooth sailing now that you've got the name issue sorted out.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today