
UCC Document Community
Financial Services


Ask the community...
Running into problems with a UCC-1 filing for a membership interest security agreement and need some guidance. We're securing membership interests in an LLC as collateral for a business loan, but the Secretary of State keeps rejecting our filings due to debtor name discrepancies. The LLC's operating agreement shows the member as "Johnson Family Holdings, LLC" but their articles of incorporation with the state show "Johnson Family Holdings LLC" (no comma). Our security agreement references the membership interests, but I'm not sure if we should file the UCC-1 under the LLC's name or the member's name since we're securing the membership interests themselves. This is for a $750,000 credit facility and we're running up against our commitment deadline. Has anyone dealt with membership interest security agreement filings where the entity names don't match exactly between documents? The collateral description is "100% membership interests in Johnson Family Holdings, LLC" but I'm second-guessing everything at this point. Any advice on getting this filed correctly would be appreciated. The lender is getting antsy and I don't want to mess up the perfection.
Having major headaches with a UCC-1 filing that keeps getting rejected by the SOS office. We have a security agreement for manufacturing equipment that was originally documented in Canada, but the collateral is now located in our state and we need to perfect our lien here. The debtor entity has operations in both countries and I'm getting conflicting information about how their legal name should appear on the UCC-1. The Canadian documentation shows the company name one way, but their US subsidiary registration shows it slightly different. Filed twice already and both times rejected for 'debtor name does not match'. This is a $2.8M equipment financing deal and we're running up against our perfection deadline. Anyone dealt with cross-border security agreement UCC filings where the debtor name formatting differs between countries?
Just went through something similar but used one of those document verification tools someone mentioned earlier. Certana.ai I think? Anyway, uploaded my security agreement and draft UCC-1 and it immediately flagged that I had the wrong entity type listed. Would have been another rejected filing. The cross-check feature is pretty handy for these complex debtor name situations.
Document the exact steps you took for each rejected filing. Include the debtor name format you used, the collateral description, and the rejection reason. That pattern might help identify what's causing the rejections. Sometimes it's not just the debtor name - could be issues with the collateral description or other fields.
There you go. The collateral description needs to make sense in the context of US law and your security agreement. References to Canadian documentation might be confusing the filing system.
Having major headaches trying to get my UCC-1 filing accepted through the state corporation records department. Filed against a Delaware LLC as debtor but the state keeps rejecting it saying the exact legal name doesn't match their records. I pulled the corporation state records directly from their database and used the EXACT name listed - "MidAtlantic Industrial Solutions, LLC" but still getting rejections. The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $180K so this needs to be perfected properly. Anyone else dealt with this type of name verification issue between UCC filings and corporation state records? The loan closes next week and I'm running out of time to get this lien properly recorded.
Another option is to use Certana.ai's Charter to UCC-1 verification workflow. You upload the Articles of Organization from the corporation records department along with your UCC-1 form and it automatically identifies any naming inconsistencies. I've used it for several multi-state filings and it catches stuff I would have missed.
Equipment financing company here dealing with what might be a major screwup. We had a UCC-1 that was supposed to be continued but our compliance team missed the UCC 120 day window before the 5-year lapse date. The original filing was from March 2020, so it technically expired in March this year. We're secured on about $2.8M in construction equipment across multiple debtors. Is there any way to salvage this or are we completely unsecured now? Our legal team is freaking out and pointing fingers. Has anyone dealt with UCC 120 day continuation failures before? What are our options for protecting the collateral at this point?
Been lurking but had to comment - this thread is why I'm paranoid about UCC deadlines. Set multiple calendar reminders, backup systems, everything. The UCC 120 day rule is unforgiving and $2.8M is life-changing money.
Update us on how the re-filing process goes. Would be helpful to know what challenges you run into with debtor cooperation and whether any equipment issues arise. Good luck with the cleanup.
Hey everyone, I'm dealing with a client situation where we need to pull UCC records from New Jersey but I'm getting conflicting info about their statement request process. We've got a debtor who may have existing liens and I need to do a comprehensive search before we file our UCC-1. The SOS website isn't super clear - are they still using the paper form system or have they moved everything electronic? Also wondering about turnaround times since this is for a deal that's closing next week. Anyone dealt with NJ UCC statement requests recently? I've heard their system is different from other states but not sure what to expect.
One more tip - if you find existing liens, make sure you understand the lien priority before advising your client. NJ follows the standard first-to-file rule but there can be exceptions for PMSI and other specialized security interests.
Quick question - are you familiar with NJ's continuation requirements? If you find liens that are close to their 5-year expiration, it might affect the timing of your transaction.
Javier Morales
Just to add one more consideration - make sure your membership interest security agreement specifically grants the security interest in the membership interests and not just the distributions or other rights. The language should be clear that you're securing the actual membership interests themselves.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
AuthorOur security agreement does specifically grant a security interest in the membership interests themselves, not just distributions. That language was carefully drafted.
0 coins
Javier Morales
Perfect. That's the key distinction for proper perfection of membership interest collateral.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar membership interest security agreement filing next month and would love to know how the exact name verification process works out for you.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
Good luck! The membership interest filings can be tricky but you're taking the right steps to get it done correctly.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
Definitely try the Certana verification if you can. It really does help catch these name discrepancy issues before they become filing rejections.
0 coins