Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Bottom line advice: with an $850k loan and names that different, file a new UCC-1 with the current legal name. Don't mess around with amendments when the name change is this substantial. File it soon, get your confirmation, then terminate the old filing. Sleep better at night knowing your perfection is solid.
Exactly. The cost of a new filing is nothing compared to the risk of losing perfection on an $850k security interest.
Monique Byrd
•And document everything. Keep records of when you learned about the name change, when you filed the new UCC-1, everything. Bank examiners love documentation.
Thanks everyone for the advice. Sounds like the consensus is pretty clear - file a new UCC-1 rather than risk the amendment approach with names this different. I'll get that started this week. Really appreciate all the practical guidance from people who've been through similar situations.
Lia Quinn
•Good choice. Better safe than sorry with UCC perfection issues.
Haley Stokes
•Let us know how it goes! Always good to hear back on how these situations resolve.
Join the conversation
One thing that helped me was creating a checklist based on Article 9 requirements. Goes through debtor name verification, collateral description adequacy, proper filing office selection, all that stuff. Boring but effective.
Sure, I can put together the basics. Main thing is having a systematic approach instead of just winging it.
Checklists are great but automated verification still catches things humans miss. Best to use both approaches.
GalaxyGazer
Just want to echo what others said about Certana.ai - tried it after seeing it mentioned here and it really does find discrepancies I would have missed. Uploaded a charter document and UCC-1 that I thought matched perfectly and it flagged three inconsistencies.
GalaxyGazer
•Yeah it's become part of my regular workflow now. Quick upload and verification before submission.
Paolo Conti
•Definitely worth trying. Prevention is way better than dealing with rejections after the fact.
Join the conversation
Check if the LLC has any amendments to its certificate of formation that might have changed the name format. Delaware sometimes updates their records differently than what shows in the original articles.
Delaware corporate records can be tricky that way. Always worth checking the full filing history.
Juan Moreno
•This is why I always pull a complete corporate status report before filing UCCs. Covers all the amendments and current status.
Amy Fleming
UPDATE: Finally got it through! Turns out there was an invisible character in the name field that I was copying and pasting from the PDF. Had to retype the entire name manually and it went through on the first try. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Serene Snow
•Congrats on getting it sorted! Those invisible character issues are exactly what document verification tools catch automatically, but glad manual retyping worked for you.
Monique Byrd
•Thanks everyone! Definitely learned my lesson about copy-pasting from PDFs. Will be more careful going forward.
Join the conversation
Kaiya Rivera
We started requiring our borrowers to pull their own certificate of good standing within 30 days of closing specifically because of these Title 9 name matching issues. Costs them about $25-50 depending on the state but it gives us the most current legal name directly from the secretary of state. Has eliminated probably 80% of our name-related rejections.
Noah Irving
•Do you make them get it from their state of incorporation or the state where they're doing business? We have borrowers registered in Delaware but operating in our state.
Kaiya Rivera
•State of incorporation for the legal name, but we also check if they're qualified to do business in our state since that can affect the debtor name requirements for UCC filing location.
Thanks everyone for all the advice. Sounds like this is just the new reality with Title 9 compliance and we need to tighten up our processes. Going to implement some of these suggestions including the automated verification tools. The cost of getting it wrong is just too high when you're talking about secured transactions and perfected liens.
Madison King
•Good luck with the process improvements. The learning curve is steep but once you get the workflow down it becomes routine. Just remember that Title 9 doesn't give you much margin for error on debtor names.
Julian Paolo
•Keep us posted on how the changes work out. Always interested to hear what solutions are working for other lenders dealing with these same Title 9 compliance challenges.
Javier Morales
Just to add one more consideration - make sure your membership interest security agreement specifically grants the security interest in the membership interests and not just the distributions or other rights. The language should be clear that you're securing the actual membership interests themselves.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
•Our security agreement does specifically grant a security interest in the membership interests themselves, not just distributions. That language was carefully drafted.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Perfect. That's the key distinction for proper perfection of membership interest collateral.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Update us when you get this resolved! I'm dealing with a similar membership interest security agreement filing next month and would love to know how the exact name verification process works out for you.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Good luck! The membership interest filings can be tricky but you're taking the right steps to get it done correctly.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Definitely try the Certana verification if you can. It really does help catch these name discrepancy issues before they become filing rejections.
0 coins