Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Update us when you figure out what went wrong! I'm curious if it was a name issue or something else entirely. These kinds of problems are learning opportunities for all of us.
Will definitely post an update once we get this resolved. Hoping it's something simple we can fix with a corrected termination filing.
Yes please update! I'm dealing with a similar situation in California and wondering if it's the same type of issue.
Lily Young
Six months is way too long for this to be unresolved. The borrower's lender should be putting pressure on you to get this fixed ASAP. Have you considered hiring a UCC service company to handle the correction filing?
Lily Young
•Sometimes it's worth paying for professional help rather than letting a deal fall apart over a filing error.
Agreed. The cost of professional UCC services is nothing compared to losing a major refinancing deal.
Join the conversation
Evelyn Kim
Whatever you do, don't delay on the corrective filing. Strict foreclosure has tight deadlines and if the debtor challenges your UCC filing validity, it could mess up your entire timeline. Also make sure your foreclosure notices go to both the old and new entity names to cover all bases.
Diego Fisher
•Should the notices go to the same address or do you need to track down addresses for both entity names?
Evelyn Kim
•Same address should be fine if it's really just a name change. But verify they're still operating from the same location.
Update us on how this turns out! I'm dealing with a similar situation on some restaurant equipment and want to know if the corrective amendment approach works for strict foreclosure cases.
Will do. Filing the UCC-3 amendment tomorrow morning and then we'll see if we need to restart the foreclosure notice process.
Good luck. Restaurant equipment cases can be tough because the businesses change so frequently.
Join the conversation
Pedro Sawyer
Also double-check that you're using the correct entity type designation. Virginia requires the exact designation from the Articles - so if it's 'Corporation' on the Articles but you're using 'Corp.' on the UCC-1, that'll get rejected.
Rita Jacobs
•We probably are abbreviating entity types without realizing it. Will need to go back and compare our UCC-1s character by character against the Articles.
Pedro Sawyer
•That's tedious but necessary. Or use one of those document comparison tools that does it automatically - saves a lot of manual checking time.
Mae Bennett
Been doing UCC filings in Virginia for 15 years and this has always been their biggest sticking point. The good news is once you figure out their exact naming requirements, your filings go through smoothly. Just takes some upfront effort to get the process right.
Any specific tips for making sure we get it right the first time? We're losing time and money on these rejections.
Mae Bennett
•Create a standardized process - always pull names from the same official source, use the same verification method, and consider automated checking if you do volume. Consistency is key with Virginia UCC Article 9 filings.
Join the conversation
warehouse inventory financing is tricky because the collateral is constantly changing hands. Make sure your UCC-1 covers future inventory acquisitions too, not just what's currently in the warehouse when you file.
Good catch. Should the collateral description include "after-acquired inventory" language specifically?
Yes, definitely include after-acquired property language since warehouse inventory turns over frequently. Standard collateral description templates usually cover this.
Maya Lewis
You'll get through this. Warehouse lien rejections for name issues are super common but easily fixable once you use the exact state database formatting. The key is acting fast since your inventory security depends on proper UCC perfection.
Lucy Taylor
•Better strict requirements than ambiguous security interests. Your lender will appreciate the properly perfected warehouse lien once it's filed correctly.
Exactly. And with automated verification tools like Certana.ai now available, there's really no excuse for name format errors on UCC filings anymore.
Brielle Johnson
I've been dealing with UCC filings for 15 years and Michigan has always been slower than most states with search updates. The fact that you have acceptance confirmations means your terminations are legally effective regardless of what the search shows. Document everything and present it to your lender with confidence.
0 coins
Brielle Johnson
•No, this is definitely a system issue not a filing issue. Your documentation should be more than sufficient for any reasonable lender.
0 coins
Honorah King
•15 years of experience and Michigan still finds ways to be frustrating. Some things never change!
0 coins
Oliver Brown
Try running the search again in a few days. Sometimes these things resolve themselves once the database catches up. In the meantime, make sure you have clean copies of all your termination documents ready for the lender.
0 coins
Philip Cowan
•Will do. Hopefully this resolves itself soon but I'll definitely have all the documentation ready either way.
0 coins
Oliver Brown
•That's the right approach. Being prepared with documentation is always better than hoping the search results are perfect.
0 coins