< Back to UCC Document Community

Samuel Robinson

UCC strict foreclosure debtor name mismatch killing our equipment recovery

We're trying to execute a UCC strict foreclosure on commercial kitchen equipment (about $180K worth) and running into serious debtor name problems that could derail everything. Our original UCC-1 filing from 2019 shows the debtor as "Johnny's Catering Services LLC" but the business has been operating under "J&M Catering Solutions LLC" for the past two years. The debtor stopped making payments 8 months ago and we sent proper notice for strict foreclosure, but now they're claiming our UCC filing is invalid because of the name discrepancy. Their attorney is saying we can't perfect our security interest because the debtor name on our UCC-1 doesn't match their current legal entity name. We did file a UCC-3 amendment last year to add collateral but didn't catch the name issue then. Has anyone dealt with UCC strict foreclosure cases where the debtor name situation gets messy like this? We're worried about losing our entire secured position over what seems like a technicality.

This is exactly why debtor name accuracy is so critical in UCC filings. You need to determine if "J&M Catering Solutions LLC" is actually a legal name change or if they're just doing business under a different name. Check with the Secretary of State records to see if there was an official entity name change filed. If it's just a DBA situation, your original UCC-1 might still be valid since it matches their legal entity name at formation.

0 coins

Good point about checking SOS records. Also worth noting that for strict foreclosure you need to be extra careful about notice requirements. If they changed their legal name officially, you might need to send new notices to both the old and new entity names to be safe.

0 coins

Wait, I'm confused about strict foreclosure vs regular foreclosure. Does the debtor name issue affect both types the same way? We're dealing with equipment too but haven't started any foreclosure process yet.

0 coins

Had a similar nightmare last year with restaurant equipment. The debtor entity had merged with another company and we didn't catch it until we tried to foreclose. Ended up having to file a UCC-3 continuation AND an amendment to fix the debtor name issue before we could proceed. Cost us months and legal fees. Your situation sounds like it might be salvageable if you can prove continuous identity between the entities.

0 coins

How did you prove continuous identity? That sounds like a legal minefield.

0 coins

Bank records, same principals, same business location, same equipment being used. Had to get depositions but it worked. The key was showing it was the same business operation just with a name change.

0 coins

Before you go down the expensive legal route, try using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your original UCC-1, the UCC-3 amendment, and any corporate documents to check for name consistency issues. It'll flag discrepancies automatically and help you see exactly what needs to be corrected. I caught a similar debtor name problem early using their system before it became a foreclosure issue.

0 coins

Never heard of that service. How does it actually work for UCC document checking?

0 coins

You just upload PDFs of your UCC documents and corporate records. It cross-references debtor names, filing numbers, and collateral descriptions to spot inconsistencies. Really straightforward and caught things our legal team missed.

0 coins

That actually sounds useful. We're always worried about filing errors that could invalidate our security interests.

0 coins

STRICT FORECLOSURE IS TRICKY ENOUGH WITHOUT NAME PROBLEMS! I've seen lenders lose everything because they didn't dot every i and cross every t. You need to file a corrective UCC-3 amendment ASAP to fix the debtor name, then restart your strict foreclosure notice process. Don't risk having a court throw out your entire security interest over this.

0 coins

Is there a time limit on filing corrective amendments? We might have a similar issue brewing.

0 coins

You can file corrective amendments as long as your UCC-1 hasn't lapsed. But the sooner the better, especially if you're in foreclosure proceedings.

0 coins

Check if your state has any case law on substantially similar debtor names. Some courts are more forgiving if the name variation wouldn't mislead other creditors doing UCC searches. But honestly, with $180K at stake, I'd fix the name issue properly rather than gamble on judicial interpretation.

0 coins

What constitutes 'substantially similar' though? Seems like that could be pretty subjective.

0 coins

Usually involves same key identifying words, same business type, same location. But you're right it's subjective and varies by jurisdiction.

0 coins

We had a case where 'Mike's Auto Repair' vs 'Michael's Auto Repair LLC' was considered too different. Better safe than sorry.

0 coins

Are you sure about the strict foreclosure procedure in your state? Some states have really specific notice requirements and if you mess up the debtor identification in the notices, you might have to start over completely. Also, did you perfect your security interest in fixtures if any of that kitchen equipment is considered fixtures?

0 coins

Good point about fixtures. Some of the equipment is built-in but we didn't file a fixture filing. The equipment is mostly moveable though - commercial ovens, prep tables, refrigeration units.

0 coins

Built-in commercial ovens might be fixtures depending on your state law. That could be another issue if you didn't file properly.

0 coins

This is why I always run document checks before starting any foreclosure action. Learned that lesson the hard way on a $90K equipment deal where we had the debtor's old corporate name. Used Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents matched current entity information before sending foreclosure notices. Saved us from exactly this kind of problem.

0 coins

How long does that verification process take? We're usually under time pressure with these deals.

0 coins

Just upload the PDFs and it checks everything in minutes. Way faster than manual document review and catches things you might miss.

0 coins

I deal with commercial kitchen equipment financing all the time and entity name changes are super common in the restaurant industry. Businesses rebrand, merge, or restructure constantly. You really need to stay on top of UCC maintenance filings to keep your security interest perfected. File that UCC-3 amendment with the correct debtor name immediately.

0 coins

How often should we be checking for debtor name changes? Annually?

0 coins

I'd say at least annually, but also any time you get notices about corporate changes or see them operating under different names. Restaurant businesses change names more than most industries.

0 coins

That's a lot of monitoring work for multiple debtors. There's got to be a better way to track this stuff.

0 coins

Whatever you do, don't delay on the corrective filing. Strict foreclosure has tight deadlines and if the debtor challenges your UCC filing validity, it could mess up your entire timeline. Also make sure your foreclosure notices go to both the old and new entity names to cover all bases.

0 coins

Should the notices go to the same address or do you need to track down addresses for both entity names?

0 coins

Same address should be fine if it's really just a name change. But verify they're still operating from the same location.

0 coins

Update us on how this turns out! I'm dealing with a similar situation on some restaurant equipment and want to know if the corrective amendment approach works for strict foreclosure cases.

0 coins

Will do. Filing the UCC-3 amendment tomorrow morning and then we'll see if we need to restart the foreclosure notice process.

0 coins

Good luck. Restaurant equipment cases can be tough because the businesses change so frequently.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today