Virginia UCC Article 9 debtor name issues causing filing rejections
Running into major headaches with Virginia's UCC Article 9 requirements and need some guidance from anyone who's dealt with this. We're a mid-size equipment financing company and have been getting rejections on UCC-1 filings because of debtor name discrepancies. The Virginia SCC keeps bouncing back our filings saying the exact legal name doesn't match their records, but we're pulling names directly from the Articles of Incorporation. Is there something specific about Virginia UCC Article 9 name matching that I'm missing? We've had 4 filings rejected in the past month and it's becoming a real problem for our loan closings. The collateral descriptions seem fine - it's always the debtor names that trip us up. Anyone know if Virginia has stricter name matching rules under Article 9 compared to other states?
31 comments
Join the conversation
Khalid Howes
Virginia can be really picky about exact name matches. I've seen them reject filings for missing commas or abbreviated words. Are you using the exact legal name as it appears on the Articles of Incorporation filed with the Virginia SCC? Sometimes there are subtle differences between what's on the corporate charter and what the SCC database shows as the current legal name.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•We thought we were using exact names but maybe there's something we're missing. The names look identical to us but obviously the system is catching something. Do you know if there's a way to verify the exact format Virginia expects?
0 coins
Khalid Howes
•The Virginia SCC has a business entity search tool that shows the exact legal name format they have on file. I always cross-reference that before filing any UCC-1. Also check if there have been any recent amendments to the Articles that might have changed the legal name slightly.
0 coins
Ben Cooper
This is exactly why I started using document verification tools. I was having the same issue with name mismatches between corporate documents and UCC filings. Found Certana.ai's verification system that lets you upload your Articles of Incorporation and UCC-1 side by side to catch these discrepancies before filing. Saved me tons of rejected filing fees.
0 coins
Naila Gordon
•How does that work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs and it compares the names automatically?
0 coins
Ben Cooper
•Yeah exactly - upload your Charter and UCC-1 documents and it instantly flags any name mismatches or inconsistencies. Shows you exactly where the differences are so you can fix them before submitting to the state.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•That sounds like it could solve our problem. We're basically flying blind right now trying to figure out what's wrong with our name formatting.
0 coins
Cynthia Love
Virginia UCC Article 9 is notorious for this. The name has to match EXACTLY as shown in the Virginia SCC records, including punctuation, abbreviations, and entity designations. I've seen rejections for things like using 'Inc.' instead of 'Incorporated' or missing a period after 'Co.
0 coins
Darren Brooks
•This is so frustrating! Why can't they just have some flexibility with obvious variations of the same name?
0 coins
Cynthia Love
•It's all about legal certainty under Article 9. The UCC filing system needs to be able to definitively identify the debtor, so exact name matching is required. Better to be strict than have disputes later about whether a filing was effective.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
ugh virginia is the WORST for this stuff. I swear they reject filings just to collect more fees. Had one rejected because we used 'Company' instead of 'Co' even though both appear on different corporate documents!!
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
•I feel your pain but they're actually being consistent with UCC Article 9 requirements. The law requires the debtor name to match exactly as it appears in the public organic record. It's annoying but serves an important legal purpose.
0 coins
Rosie Harper
•I get the legal purpose but when the SAME COMPANY has different name formats on different official documents it becomes impossible to know which one to use
0 coins
Demi Hall
Are you checking for any recent corporate changes? Sometimes companies file amendments that slightly modify their legal name and the UCC database updates faster than our internal records. Also make sure you're not using any DBA names instead of the legal entity name.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•Good point about recent changes. We pull our names from credit applications which might not reflect the most current legal name. Will start checking the Virginia SCC database directly.
0 coins
Demi Hall
•That's probably your issue right there. Credit apps often have outdated or informal business names. Always verify against the current state database for UCC filings.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
•This is exactly why I do that document cross-check with Certana.ai before every filing now. Catches these kinds of name discrepancies that are so easy to miss manually.
0 coins
Kara Yoshida
Have you tried calling the Virginia SCC UCC division directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what's wrong with the name format. They're usually pretty helpful if you explain you keep getting rejections.
0 coins
Philip Cowan
•Yeah their UCC staff is actually quite helpful. They won't pre-approve filings but they'll often explain why something was rejected if you call.
0 coins
Caesar Grant
Make sure you're also not including unnecessary punctuation or spacing. Virginia's system is very literal - extra spaces, missing periods, or wrong comma placement will trigger rejections under their Article 9 implementation.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•This is probably our issue. We might have extra spaces or formatting that looks fine to us but doesn't match their exact database format.
0 coins
Caesar Grant
•Exactly. The computer system doesn't interpret anything - it just does exact character matching. One extra space anywhere in the name and it's a rejection.
0 coins
Lena Schultz
I went through this same nightmare last year with Virginia UCC filings. What finally worked was creating a checklist that includes pulling the exact legal name from the Virginia SCC business search, copying it character for character, and then having someone else verify it matches before filing. Haven't had a rejection since.
0 coins
Gemma Andrews
•That's a good system. Manual verification helps but it's still easy to miss subtle differences when you're doing volume filings.
0 coins
Lena Schultz
•True, which is why I supplement with automated checking tools now. Humans miss things that computers catch instantly.
0 coins
Pedro Sawyer
Also double-check that you're using the correct entity type designation. Virginia requires the exact designation from the Articles - so if it's 'Corporation' on the Articles but you're using 'Corp.' on the UCC-1, that'll get rejected.
0 coins
Rita Jacobs
•We probably are abbreviating entity types without realizing it. Will need to go back and compare our UCC-1s character by character against the Articles.
0 coins
Pedro Sawyer
•That's tedious but necessary. Or use one of those document comparison tools that does it automatically - saves a lot of manual checking time.
0 coins
Mae Bennett
Been doing UCC filings in Virginia for 15 years and this has always been their biggest sticking point. The good news is once you figure out their exact naming requirements, your filings go through smoothly. Just takes some upfront effort to get the process right.
0 coins
Beatrice Marshall
•Any specific tips for making sure we get it right the first time? We're losing time and money on these rejections.
0 coins
Mae Bennett
•Create a standardized process - always pull names from the same official source, use the same verification method, and consider automated checking if you do volume. Consistency is key with Virginia UCC Article 9 filings.
0 coins