< Back to UCC Document Community

Nasira Ibanez

NC UCC financing statement debtor name rejected twice - what am I missing?

I'm pulling my hair out here. Filed a UCC-1 in North Carolina last week for a commercial equipment loan and it got rejected for "debtor name discrepancy." I double-checked everything against the borrower's articles of incorporation - exact spelling, punctuation, everything matches. Refiled yesterday with the exact same information and boom, rejected again. The collateral description is straightforward (2024 Caterpillar 320 excavator, serial #XYZ789). I've done dozens of these filings in other states without issues. What specific quirks does NC have that I'm not catching? The rejection notice just says "debtor name does not match records" but doesn't specify which records. Is there some NC-specific database they cross-reference against that I'm missing? This is holding up a $180K equipment financing and my client is getting antsy.

Khalil Urso

•

NC can be tricky with entity names. Did you check if the company has any DBA filings or trade names registered? Sometimes they want the exact legal name as it appears in the Secretary of State database, not necessarily what's on the articles of incorporation. Also, NC is picky about punctuation - periods, commas, ampersands vs. "and" - all that stuff matters.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

I pulled the entity from the NC SOS database directly and copied the name exactly. No DBAs that I can find. The ampersand thing is interesting though - the articles say "Smith & Sons Construction LLC" but maybe the SOS database has it as "Smith and Sons Construction LLC"?

0 coins

Myles Regis

•

That's probably it right there. NC is notorious for this. I've seen filings rejected because someone used "Corp." instead of "Corporation" or put a space where there shouldn't be one.

0 coins

Brian Downey

•

Check the entity status too. If the LLC is administratively dissolved or not in good standing, that could cause the rejection. NC won't accept filings against entities that aren't current. You might need to get the entity reinstated first before filing the UCC-1.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Good point, but I verified the entity is active and in good standing. Filed their annual report just last month.

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

•

Sometimes there's a lag between when the annual report is filed and when it shows up in whatever system they use for UCC name matching. Might be worth waiting a few days and trying again.

0 coins

I ran into this exact issue last month. Turns out I was using the wrong entity type designation. The articles said "Limited Liability Company" but the SOS database had it as "LLC" - or maybe it was the other way around. Either way, I had to try like 4 different variations before one stuck. Super frustrating when you're trying to meet a closing deadline.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

This is maddening. Why can't they just tell you exactly what name they have on file instead of making you guess?

0 coins

Callum Savage

•

Because that would make too much sense. I've started using a document checker tool that compares the entity info against the UCC filing before submitting. Saved me a lot of headaches. It's called Certana.ai - you just upload your articles of incorporation and your UCC-1 draft and it flags any discrepancies. Found issues I never would have caught manually.

0 coins

Ally Tailer

•

That sounds helpful. Does it work with NC specifically? Some of these tools don't cover all states.

0 coins

Another thing to check - make sure you're not including any parent company info or subsidiary designations that might not be part of the official legal name. I've seen people add stuff like "a division of ABC Corp" when that's not actually part of the entity name in the state records.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

It's a standalone LLC, no parent company or subsidiary language. Just the basic entity name.

0 coins

Are you 100% sure about the entity type? Sometimes what looks like an LLC in the articles is actually registered as a PLLC or something else in the state system.

0 coins

Cass Green

•

I hate to be that guy, but have you tried calling the NC SOS office? I know their customer service can be hit or miss, but sometimes they can tell you exactly what's wrong with the filing. They might see something in their system that's not obvious from the rejection notice.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Actually haven't tried calling yet. Was hoping to figure it out myself first. Might be worth a shot at this point.

0 coins

Good luck getting through. Last time I called NC SOS I was on hold for 45 minutes and then got disconnected.

0 coins

Madison Tipne

•

Their online chat is sometimes faster if you can catch them during business hours. Not always the most helpful, but at least you don't have to sit on hold.

0 coins

One more thought - double check that you're filing against the right entity entirely. I once spent a week trying to get a UCC-1 accepted only to discover the borrower had formed a new LLC for the equipment purchase and I was filing against their old entity. Felt pretty stupid when I figured that out.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Definitely the right entity. It's the same one on the loan docs and the equipment purchase agreement.

0 coins

Malia Ponder

•

Just to triple-check - you're filing in NC because that's where the debtor is organized, not where the equipment is located, right? I've seen people file in the wrong state because they got confused about the collateral location vs. debtor location rules.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Yes, LLC is organized in NC. Equipment will be used in SC but I know the filing goes where the debtor is organized for non-fixture equipment.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

This is why I always run everything through Certana.ai before filing. Upload your articles of incorporation and your UCC-1 form and it catches name mismatches, missing info, formatting issues, all that stuff. Would have saved you the rejection fees and the headache. I think I've prevented like 6 rejections in the past month just by using their document checker.

0 coins

Ryder Ross

•

Is that expensive? My firm is always looking for ways to reduce filing errors but we're pretty cost-conscious.

0 coins

Kyle Wallace

•

It's way cheaper than dealing with rejected filings and re-filing fees. Plus the time savings when you're trying to close deals. I just upload the PDFs and it tells me if there are any issues before I submit to the state.

0 coins

Try searching the NC SOS database for variations of the name. Sometimes they have weird abbreviations or formatting that's not obvious. Like maybe they have "Constr" instead of "Construction" or something like that.

0 coins

Nasira Ibanez

•

Good idea. I'll try some variations and see what comes up. This whole thing is making me paranoid about every filing now.

0 coins

Henry Delgado

•

Don't feel bad, NC is one of the pickier states. I've had filings rejected there for the dumbest reasons. Once got rejected because I had two spaces between words instead of one.

0 coins

Olivia Kay

•

UPDATE: Found the issue! The entity name in the SOS database had "Smith and Sons Construction, LLC" with a comma before LLC, but the articles of incorporation didn't have the comma. Such a tiny detail but apparently it matters. Refiled with the comma and it went through. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!

0 coins

Joshua Hellan

•

Glad you got it sorted! That comma thing is so typical of NC. They're super particular about punctuation.

0 coins

Callum Savage

•

This is exactly the kind of thing that document verification tool would have caught. Punctuation discrepancies are like the #1 reason for UCC rejections.

0 coins

Jibriel Kohn

•

A comma! All that stress over a comma. I'm definitely going to be more careful about punctuation going forward.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today