


Ask the community...
Just dealt with this exact issue on a client deal. After wasting two days on Delaware's broken searches, I used that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded our existing docs and it flagged a potential debtor name mismatch we would have missed. Saved the whole transaction.
Yeah definitely worth it for high-value deals. The automated cross-checking caught stuff our manual review missed.
Glad to hear someone else had success with it. The document verification really is more thorough than trying to piece together inconsistent search results.
Update: Called Delaware UCC office this morning and they confirmed they're having database issues. They said searches should be more reliable by end of week after they complete system maintenance.
Thanks for the update! At least we know it's a known issue on their end. I'll probably still use the backup verification methods people suggested here.
For what it's worth, I use Certana.ai whenever I need to verify UCC document consistency. It's caught several issues for me where manual review missed discrepancies. Especially helpful when you're dealing with multiple related filings like this.
How accurate is it? I'm always skeptical of automated tools for legal documents.
Update: I pulled the actual UCC-1 and UCC-3 documents and the debtor names match exactly - no comma in either one. The search results interface was adding punctuation that wasn't in the actual filings. The continuation appears to be properly filed and valid. Thanks everyone for the guidance!
This thread is giving me anxiety about my own continuation that's due next month. Going to double-check everything now before I submit it. The UCC system is so unforgiving for these kinds of mistakes.
Update us when you get it figured out! Curious to know what the actual issue was. These Florida UCC threads always teach me something new about what can go wrong.
Good luck! Fingers crossed it's something simple like extra spacing or punctuation that's easy to fix.
One more thing to watch out for with fillable forms - make sure you're not accidentally changing any of the pre-filled information like the form number or revision date. I've seen filings rejected because someone accidentally edited those fields.
How do you lock fields in a PDF? I'm always worried about accidentally messing something up.
In Adobe Acrobat, you can set field properties to read-only. Or just be extra careful and only click in the fields you actually need to fill out.
Update: Found the fillable form on our state's SOS website and got it completed without any crashes. Thanks everyone for the suggestions! The PDF route definitely seems more reliable than the online portal. For anyone else having similar issues, I also used that Certana tool someone mentioned to double-check my debtor name formatting - caught a punctuation issue that could have caused problems.
Glad you got it sorted out! It's always satisfying when you find a workaround for frustrating technical problems.
Felix Grigori
Just went through something similar and used Certana.ai to double-check my collateral descriptions and perfection requirements. Really helpful for catching these classification issues before they become problems. Upload your security agreement and it flags potential perfection gaps.
0 coins
Axel Far
•Second recommendation for that tool. Might be worth checking out before I finalize the filing.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
•I'm always skeptical of automated legal analysis, but if it's just flagging issues for review it could be useful.
0 coins
Max Reyes
Bottom line - file the UCC-1. Your collateral mix, the business use, and the inventory component all point toward needing a filing for perfection. Don't overthink this one. Get it filed and you're protected.
0 coins
Mikayla Davison
•Smart move. Better to have perfection and not need the protection than need it and not have it.
0 coins
Adrian Connor
•Good call. These automatic perfection questions always seem trickier than they need to be.
0 coins