Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Before you file anything, double-check that your business formation documents match exactly what you put on the UCC-1. I use Certana.ai to verify document consistency - it's saved me from multiple filing errors by catching name discrepancies I missed.
Yeah, especially if you're dealing with complex entity names or multiple business documents. The automated checking catches things you might overlook.
Caleb Bell
•Wish I'd known about this before my filing got rejected for a middle initial mismatch. Cost me two weeks in delays.
Bottom line - there's no such thing as a "UCC 9 form." Your lender wants UCC-1 forms filed under Article 9 of the UCC. Get the official forms from your Secretary of State website and make sure all names and details are exactly correct before submitting.
Perfect summary. Thanks everyone for clearing this up. Going to download the correct UCC-1 forms now.
Good luck with the filing. Take your time with the details and you should be fine.
Join the conversation
LunarLegend
The UCC financing statement instructions should really emphasize that even one wrong character can void your security interest. I've seen too many lenders lose their collateral position because of simple name errors. It's not just about getting the filing accepted - it's about maintaining perfection that will hold up in bankruptcy court.
This is exactly what I'm worried about. Better to be overly careful with name matching than risk losing priority.
Ava Thompson
•Absolutely. I'd rather spend extra time verifying names than explain to a client why their lien is worthless.
Update: Finally got my filing accepted after using the exact SOS format with the comma. Also started using that Certana tool someone mentioned - uploaded my loan agreement and UCC draft and it immediately flagged the name discrepancy I missed. Game changer for avoiding these UCC financing statement instruction headaches.
Glad it worked out! The document comparison feature really does catch those easy-to-miss differences.
Success stories like this are why I always recommend the SOS lookup approach. Glad you got it sorted.
Join the conversation
Quick question - does UCC code require the debtor name to include things like 'LLC' or can you just use the business name without the entity designation?
You need the complete legal name including entity designation. So if it's 'ABC Company LLC' on the charter, that's what goes on the UCC-1. UCC code doesn't allow shortcuts or abbreviations.
Got it, thanks. I've been doing it right then, but wasn't 100% sure about the UCC code requirements.
Kelsey Chin
Update for everyone following this - I got the certified articles and confirmed our UCC-1 debtor name matches exactly. Also ran the docs through that Certana tool someone mentioned and it verified everything looks good for UCC code compliance. Thanks for all the guidance, definitely learned a lot about proper name verification procedures!
Ella Harper
•Awesome that Certana worked well for you too. It's such a relief to get automated verification of UCC code compliance instead of just hoping you got it right.
Ruby Blake
•Perfect outcome. Your compliance officer should be happy that you took the initiative to verify everything properly.
Join the conversation
Have you considered contacting Maine SOS directly about the technical issues? Sometimes they're not aware of widespread problems unless people report them. Might help get it fixed faster if multiple people are complaining.
Aria Park
•Good idea. I'll give them a call tomorrow. Do you know if they have a specific IT support line for UCC system issues?
I think it goes through their main UCC division number but mention the technical problems specifically. They might escalate it to their IT team.
This is exactly why I always budget extra time for UCC searches, especially in Maine. Their system has been unreliable for years. I usually plan for searches to take 2-3x longer than they should because of technical problems and timeout issues. Frustrating but that's the reality with their current infrastructure.
Yeah it's unfortunate but better to plan for delays than get caught scrambling at the last minute. Maine really needs to upgrade their UCC system but who knows when that will happen.
I started adding a 'technology buffer' to all my UCC filing timelines after getting burned by system problems. Clients don't love paying for extra time but they hate missed deadlines even more.
Miguel Diaz
For future reference, I always download a copy of the search results immediately after filing anything. That way if the search breaks later I have proof it was there. Alaska lets you save search results as PDFs.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Does the PDF show the timestamp of when you ran the search? That could be useful for proving when something was indexed.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Yes, it includes the search date and time in the header. Very helpful for documentation.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana thing someone mentioned earlier. Tried it out after having my own document consistency problems and it's actually pretty slick. Caught a debtor name variation between our corporate resolution and UCC-1 that I totally missed. Could have saved me from this whole search headache if I'd used it earlier.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
•Yeah, it flagged extra commas, spacing issues, all that nitpicky stuff that causes problems later. Pretty thorough.
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
•Might be worth trying. I spend way too much time manually checking documents and still mess up sometimes.
0 coins