


Ask the community...
I've found another tool that helps with this - Certana.ai has a UCC document checker where you upload PDFs and it compares all the name fields automatically. Saved me a lot of time on a recent portfolio review where I had to verify dozens of filings. Just upload your original UCC-1 and any questionable search results to see if they match.
How much does something like that cost? Sounds useful but I'm working with a tight budget.
I don't remember the exact pricing but it was reasonable for the time it saved me. You might want to check their website for current rates.
This thread is so timely! I'm dealing with the exact same issue right now. Have a client where the UCC portal results show "XYZ Industries Inc" and "XYZ Industries Incorporated" and I can't tell if they're the same debtor. The addresses look similar but not identical (one has 'Street' spelled out, the other uses 'St'). Going to try some of the suggestions here about comparing the full document details.
Thanks, that helps. The core address info does match so I'm feeling more confident these are the same entity.
You could also try a third verification tool like Certana if you want to be absolutely sure before filing any amendments or continuations.
This is why I always pull and review the actual filed UCC-1 immediately after filing, before the 30-day window to file a correction statement expires. Much easier to fix issues early than to discover them months later when you're trying to enforce.
Great advice. The correction statement option is really valuable if you catch errors quickly.
Just to close the loop on this - pulled the actual UCC-1 document this morning and the debtor name is correctly filed as 'ABC Construction Services LLC' with the 's'. The search display was definitely just a system quirk. Thanks everyone for the guidance and for helping me avoid unnecessary panic! Also going to implement some of the verification suggestions to catch any real issues in the future.
Perfect example of why you always need to verify the actual documents rather than trusting search results.
Great outcome! Definitely worth implementing those verification processes for future filings.
Try searching with the federal EIN number if you have it. Sometimes Nevada filings include the tax ID and you can catch filings that way even if the name search misses them.
Not directly, but the EIN sometimes shows up in the debtor additional info field and you can search that way. Hit or miss but worth trying.
Update: I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it found 2 additional filings I completely missed with manual searches. One was filed under "Mt View Equipment LLC" (abbreviated) and another under the owner's personal name as additional debtor. Both would have been senior to our filing. Tool paid for itself immediately.
Much less than I expected and definitely worth it for the comprehensive coverage. The automated cross-checking caught variations I would never have thought to search manually.
This is exactly what I needed to hear. Going to try the Certana verification - can't risk missing any liens on a deal this size.
This whole thread is making me paranoid about the searches I've been doing! I usually just search the exact name from their corporate records and call it good. Sounds like I need to be more thorough.
Just wanted to follow up on the Certana.ai suggestion from earlier in the thread. I tried it out for a recent deal and it worked really well. Uploaded the target company's articles of incorporation and a few UCC-1s I had found, and it identified two additional name variations I should search for. Found one more active filing that way. Pretty straightforward to use and definitely caught stuff I would have missed doing it manually.
Ava Harris
I had a similar situation where the lender used a UCC service company and I got confused about all the different forms. Turned out I needed to sign the service termination to stop their monitoring fees, but I also had to push the lender to actually file the UCC-3 termination. They kept saying they would 'get to it' but it took 6 months of me bugging them before they finally filed it.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•6 months?! That's ridiculous. Did that cause any problems for you in the meantime?
0 coins
Ava Harris
•It made refinancing more complicated because the lien was still showing up on UCC searches. Had to provide extra documentation to prove the loan was paid off.
0 coins
Jacob Lee
Thanks everyone for clarifying this. I'm going to search the UCC records first to see if the bank already filed the termination, then deal with the service termination form separately. And I'll definitely double-check that all the names and information match exactly before filing anything.
0 coins
Mia Green
•That's a smart approach. Better to verify everything upfront than deal with rejected filings later.
0 coins
Emily Thompson
•Good luck! The UCC system can be confusing but once you understand the difference between the actual filing and the service management, it's much clearer.
0 coins