Minnesota UCC search debtor name exact match requirements - filing got rejected
I'm dealing with a major headache trying to get our UCC-1 filing accepted in Minnesota and I'm hoping someone here has dealt with this before. We have a borrower whose legal name on their articles of incorporation is "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" but when I search the Minnesota UCC database, there are multiple similar entries with slight variations like "Advanced Manufacturing Solution LLC" (missing the 's') and "Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC". Our lender is requiring an exact debtor name match for the collateral agreement but I'm getting conflicting information about Minnesota's search requirements. The SOS office rejected our initial filing saying the debtor name didn't match their records exactly, but I can't figure out what name they actually have on file. Has anyone successfully navigated Minnesota UCC search requirements when there are multiple similar business names? I need to get this UCC-1 filed correctly because we're closing on equipment financing next week and can't afford any more delays. Any advice on how to determine the exact debtor name format that Minnesota expects would be incredibly helpful.
37 comments
Join the conversation
NebulaNinja
Minnesota can be tricky with debtor names - they're pretty strict about exact matches. Have you tried calling the SOS office directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what name format they have in their system.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
•I tried calling but got transferred three times and never got a clear answer. The person I finally talked to just said 'check the database' which is what I was already doing.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•That's frustrating but typical. The phone support for UCC stuff is usually not great.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
You need to run a search using the exact legal name from the articles of incorporation first. If that doesn't return results, try variations systematically. Minnesota's system is case-sensitive and punctuation-sensitive too.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•I did try the exact name from the articles but got no results. That's what's confusing me - if they don't have that exact name, how do I know what they do have?
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Sometimes the business filed under a slightly different name or there was a typo in their original filing. You might need to do a broader search.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for UCC verification. You can upload your articles of incorporation and your proposed UCC-1 side by side and it instantly flags any name discrepancies. Saved me from multiple rejection cycles.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
Had this same issue in Minnesota last month! The trick is to search by partial name first to see all the variations, then cross-reference with the Secretary of State's business entity database to find the correct legal name.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Good idea - I hadn't thought to check the business entity database separately. Did you find discrepancies between what was filed there and what showed up in UCC searches?
0 coins
Ava Garcia
•Yes! The business entity database had the correct legal name but someone had filed a UCC with a shortened version years ago. Had to use the entity database name for our new filing.
0 coins
StarSailor}
MINNESOTA IS THE WORST FOR THIS STUFF. I swear they reject filings just to make you pay multiple times. Their search function is garbage and half the time the results don't make sense.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
•I feel your pain but getting angry won't help solve the filing issue. Focus on getting the name right.
0 coins
StarSailor}
•Easy to say when you're not facing a deadline! But you're right, I need to just figure out their system.
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
Try searching with and without LLC at the end. Some states are inconsistent about how they handle entity designations in UCC filings.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•That's not really accurate for Minnesota though. They typically require the full legal name including entity type.
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
•You might be right - I was thinking of a different state. Each one has their own quirks.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
Have you considered getting a UCC search report from a professional service? They usually know the ins and outs of each state's requirements and can tell you exactly what's on file.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•I thought about that but wasn't sure if it was worth the cost for just one filing. How much do those typically run?
0 coins
Yara Nassar
•Usually around $50-100 depending on the service. Might be worth it to avoid more rejection fees and delays.
0 coins
Keisha Robinson
•Or you could try the Certana.ai document checker - upload your articles and UCC-1 draft and it compares them automatically. Much faster than ordering a search report.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
Check if there are any UCC-3 amendments or continuations on file that might show the preferred name format. Sometimes looking at the filing history gives you clues.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•That's smart - I can see what format was used in previous filings by the same debtor.
0 coins
Paolo Ricci
•Just make sure those previous filings were actually accepted and not rejected for the same reason!
0 coins
Amina Toure
I had similar issues with debtor names last year. What worked for me was doing a wildcard search with just the first few words of the business name to see all variations, then picking the one that made the most sense.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Did Minnesota's system support wildcard searches? I couldn't figure out how to do partial name searches.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•You have to use their advanced search option - it's not obvious but there's a way to search by partial names.
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•Advanced search is buried in their interface but it's definitely there. Look for 'search options' or similar.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
Whatever you do, make sure you print out or screenshot your search results showing what names are actually in their system. If there's a dispute later you'll want proof of what was available when you filed.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Great advice! Documentation is always important when dealing with state filing offices.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Good point - I should definitely keep records of my search attempts.
0 coins
Emma Davis
Just went through this exact scenario! Turned out the issue was that Minnesota had the company name with a comma before LLC and I was searching without it. Tiny punctuation differences can kill your search results.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Oh wow, I never thought about comma placement. I should try searching with different punctuation variations.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•This is exactly why automated tools like Certana.ai are so helpful - they catch these tiny differences that humans miss. Upload your docs and it flags punctuation mismatches instantly.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Honestly might be worth trying that tool - I wasted so much time on manual comparisons before finding the comma issue.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar issue in Wisconsin and curious if the solution works across states.
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•Will do! Hoping to get this resolved tomorrow so I can file before the weekend.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•Wisconsin has similar name matching requirements so the solution might translate.
0 coins