< Back to UCC Document Community

Emma Anderson

UCC financing statement Minnesota portal keeps rejecting - debtor name issues?

Been trying to file a UCC-1 for three days now and Minnesota's portal keeps spitting it back. The rejection notice says 'debtor name format error' but I'm copying exactly from the corporate charter. This is for equipment financing on construction gear, about $340k loan. The debtor is 'Northland Construction Solutions LLC' - that's exactly how it appears on their Articles of Organization from the Secretary of State website. But every time I submit the UCC financing statement Minnesota system rejects it. Anyone else having problems with MN's filing system lately? The lender is breathing down my neck and I can't figure out what's wrong with the debtor name. Is there some weird formatting rule I'm missing? This should be straightforward but I'm stuck.

Minnesota can be picky about exact name matching. Are you including any punctuation or spaces that might not match their database? Sometimes the Articles show one format but the SOS database has it stored slightly different.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

I thought about that but I copy-pasted directly from their online lookup tool. The name shows as 'Northland Construction Solutions LLC' with that exact spacing.

0 coins

Copy-paste can pick up hidden characters sometimes. Try typing it out manually.

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

Had this exact problem last month! MN's system was rejecting because there was some kind of invisible character in the name field. Drove me crazy for two days.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

What did you end up doing to fix it?

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

Had to clear the field completely and type everything fresh. No copy-paste at all. That finally worked.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

This is why I hate these state portals. So finicky about formatting.

0 coins

Freya Nielsen

•

Minnesota requires the exact legal name as registered with the Secretary of State. But here's the thing - sometimes there are discrepancies between what shows on the public search and what's actually in their internal database. You might need to call the SOS office directly to verify the exact format they have on file. Also check if there's a middle initial or designation that's not showing up in your search.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

That's a good point. I'll try calling them tomorrow. Do you know if they charge for name verification?

0 coins

Freya Nielsen

•

Usually no charge for basic name verification. Just tell them you need to confirm the exact legal name format for UCC filing purposes.

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

I've been using Certana.ai's document verification tool for situations like this. You can upload your UCC-1 draft and the corporate charter, and it instantly cross-checks the debtor names to catch any inconsistencies. Really helpful for avoiding these rejection headaches. The tool spotted a subtle spacing issue in my last filing that I never would have caught manually.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

Never heard of that before. Is it specifically for UCC filings?

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

Yeah, it's designed for secured transaction documents. Just upload your PDFs and it verifies everything matches up properly. Saved me so much time on name verification.

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

Anything that can catch these formatting issues before filing sounds worth trying.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Minnesota's portal is THE WORST. I swear they change the requirements without telling anyone. Last year I had a filing rejected because they suddenly wanted the ZIP+4 format instead of just 5 digits.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Same here! And their error messages are useless. 'Format error' tells you nothing.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Exactly! At least tell us WHICH part of the format is wrong.

0 coins

Check if the LLC has any assumed names or DBAs filed. Sometimes the UCC system expects the primary registered name even if they do business under something else. Also verify the entity is still active - if it's been dissolved or merged, that could cause rejection issues.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

Good thinking. I checked and they're active with good standing. No DBAs that I can see.

0 coins

Then it's probably just a formatting quirk. The manual typing suggestion from earlier is worth trying.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

I had one where there was an extra space at the end of the name field. Invisible but enough to cause rejection.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

This is exactly why I triple-check everything before submitting. These state systems are so picky about every little detail. Have you tried using all caps? Some states prefer that format.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

The charter shows mixed case so I used that. Worth trying all caps though.

0 coins

Minnesota usually accepts either format but consistency is key. Don't mix caps and lowercase randomly.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Maybe there's a character limit issue? Some portals have weird limits on name length that aren't obvious. 'Northland Construction Solutions LLC' is pretty long.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

That's only 34 characters though. Seems reasonable for a business name.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

True, but I've seen stranger things cause problems in these systems.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

UPDATE: Finally got it to work! Called the SOS office and they confirmed the name format was correct. The issue was I was using the wrong entity type code. Had to select 'Limited Liability Company' instead of just 'LLC' in the dropdown. Minnesota's system is particular about that distinction.

0 coins

Freya Nielsen

•

Ah yes, the entity type field can be tricky. Good catch!

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Of course it was something completely unrelated to the name itself. These systems are ridiculous.

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

This is exactly why document verification tools are so helpful - they catch these cross-field consistency issues too.

0 coins

Glad you got it sorted! Filing rejections are so frustrating especially when you're under deadline pressure.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

Thanks! Definitely learned to double-check those dropdown fields now.

0 coins

We've all been there. The important thing is the UCC-1 is finally filed properly.

0 coins

Grace Patel

•

This is such a common issue! I've run into similar problems with state filing systems being overly sensitive to formatting. The entity type dropdown confusion is especially frustrating - you'd think "LLC" and "Limited Liability Company" would be treated the same way, but these systems can be surprisingly literal. Thanks for sharing the solution, this will definitely help others who run into the same problem. It's always the little details that trip us up!

0 coins

Absolutely agree! These state systems really need better user experience design. The fact that "LLC" vs "Limited Liability Company" caused a rejection is exactly the kind of thing that should be handled automatically by the system. It's frustrating when you're doing everything right but getting tripped up by these technical quirks. At least now we know to check those entity type fields more carefully!

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today