


Ask the community...
Quick question - for the $2.3M facility, are you doing a single UCC-1 or separate filings for each type of collateral? The equipment vs inventory distinction might matter for the collateral description.
Planning on a single comprehensive filing with detailed collateral descriptions for both equipment and inventory. Should be fine under 9-104 since it's all one debtor in one filing state.
That should work fine. Just make sure your collateral descriptions are specific enough to satisfy Delaware's requirements.
Bottom line - Delaware filing is definitely correct under UCC 9-104. I'd also recommend double-checking your collateral descriptions and debtor name formatting before submitting. Maybe run it through one of those document verification tools to catch any issues beforehand.
Good luck with the filing! Delaware usually processes pretty quickly so you should have confirmation well before your closing deadline.
Let us know how it goes. Always interested to hear about successful multistate filings.
For what it's worth, I always do my Indiana UCC searches at the beginning of the week. Their system seems more reliable on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Fridays are terrible for timeouts and errors.
That's actually a good tip! I never thought about timing affecting the system performance.
Monday mornings are also bad because everyone's trying to file after the weekend. Weekday afternoons work best for me.
Update: I ended up using the Certana document checker that several people mentioned and it immediately caught the comma issue plus two other small discrepancies I hadn't noticed. Filed successfully this morning using their recommendations and got acceptance confirmation within an hour. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this forum saved my loan closing!
Update us when you find out who filed that termination. I'm curious if this is becoming a pattern with certain law firms or if it's just random fraud.
This thread is making me want to audit all my UCC filings. Anyone know if there's a bulk way to verify multiple filings at once rather than checking each one individually?
Perfect, that's exactly what I need. Manual checking is taking me forever and I keep making mistakes.
I just do batch searches on the SOS website. Not as thorough but at least I can see if anything obvious is wrong.
I actually used Certana.ai for a similar situation where I had document inconsistencies across my UCC filings. Their tool caught several name variations that I missed when reviewing manually. It's especially helpful for corporate names where there might be punctuation differences or abbreviation inconsistencies that cause rejections.
That's the second recommendation for Certana.ai on this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking my documents for any subtle inconsistencies I'm missing.
Just to add another perspective - sometimes UCC-5 rejections happen because the filing office can't clearly read your handwriting or the form wasn't filled out completely. Make sure every field is legible and all required information is provided before you blame it on the name issue.
I filed electronically so handwriting shouldn't be an issue, but I'll double-check that I completed every required field on the UCC-5 form.
Oliver Becker
The debtor name issue is definitely your biggest concern. I've seen courts rule that missing punctuation makes a UCC filing seriously misleading, which essentially voids your perfected security interest. You need to get that corrected ASAP with a UCC-3 amendment.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
•You could try that argument but it's risky. Ohio follows the 'exact match' standard pretty strictly. Better to file the amendment and have clean documentation than try to argue the point later if you need to enforce your security interest.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
•I actually just went through this with Certana.ai's document checker on a similar filing issue. It immediately flagged the name mismatch between our corporate charter and UCC-1, saved us from finding out the hard way during a default. Really wish I'd used it before the original filing.
0 coins
Javier Hernandez
This thread is making me paranoid about all my filings now. Going to go back and double-check every debtor name against the state records. Better safe than sorry with these UCC requirements.
0 coins
Javier Hernandez
•At least you caught it before a default situation. Could have been much worse timing.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•Same here, this discussion is a good reminder to audit our existing filings. UCC mistakes are expensive mistakes.
0 coins