UCC Document Community
Financial Services
/
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
UCC Filing Issues with Property Offered as Security for Loan Agreement
Having major problems with our UCC-1 filing getting rejected by the SOS office. We're trying to perfect our security interest in equipment that our borrower put up as collateral for a $485K commercial loan. The rejection notice says our collateral description is "insufficient" but we described it as "all equipment, machinery, and fixtures used in debtor's manufacturing operations located at 1247 Industrial Blvd." This is our third attempt and we're running out of time before the loan closes next week. The debtor name matches exactly what's on their articles of incorporation, so that's not the issue. Our loan agreement clearly identifies this property as security but somehow the UCC office doesn't think our description is adequate? Anyone dealt with similar collateral description problems? We've been doing equipment financing for 8 years and never had this much trouble with a filing. Really need to get this perfected ASAP.
Join the conversation
UCC security interest perfection question - equipment financing gone wrong
So I'm dealing with a mess right now and hoping someone can point me in the right direction. We financed some manufacturing equipment back in March 2024 (about $185k) and I thought we had everything buttoned up with our UCC security interest filing. Fast forward to now and we're trying to work out some payment modifications with the borrower, but when I pulled our UCC-1 to review the collateral description, I'm seeing some potential issues that are keeping me up at night. The debtor name on our UCC-1 shows as "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" but I'm now looking at their articles of incorporation and it shows "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" (with the comma). Our collateral description says "all manufacturing equipment located at 1247 Industrial Blvd" but doesn't get more specific than that. The equipment we actually financed includes 3 CNC machines, 2 welding stations, and some smaller tooling - should we have been more detailed? I'm worried our UCC security interest isn't properly perfected and if this borrower defaults, we might not have the lien position we think we do. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name discrepancies or vague collateral descriptions? What's the best way to clean this up without losing our priority date from the original filing?
Join the conversation
The debtor name issue is definitely your biggest concern. I've seen courts rule that missing punctuation makes a UCC filing seriously misleading, which essentially voids your perfected security interest. You need to get that corrected ASAP with a UCC-3 amendment.
You could try that argument but it's risky. Ohio follows the 'exact match' standard pretty strictly. Better to file the amendment and have clean documentation than try to argue the point later if you need to enforce your security interest.
I actually just went through this with Certana.ai's document checker on a similar filing issue. It immediately flagged the name mismatch between our corporate charter and UCC-1, saved us from finding out the hard way during a default. Really wish I'd used it before the original filing.
This thread is making me paranoid about all my filings now. Going to go back and double-check every debtor name against the state records. Better safe than sorry with these UCC requirements.
At least you caught it before a default situation. Could have been much worse timing.
Same here, this discussion is a good reminder to audit our existing filings. UCC mistakes are expensive mistakes.
UCC 9 104 proper place to file interpretation - multistate debtor confusion
Been wrestling with UCC 9-104 for weeks now trying to figure out the proper place to file for a commercial borrower that has operations in three different states. The debtor is an LLC organized in Delaware but their main office and most assets are in Texas, plus they have a significant warehouse facility in Arizona. Our loan officer is pushing to close next week but I'm stuck on whether we need to file in Delaware as the state of organization or if Texas qualifies as the main office location under 9-104. The collateral includes equipment at all three locations plus inventory that moves between facilities. I've read the statute about ten times and the commentary but I'm still not 100% confident. Anyone dealt with similar multistate filing scenarios under 9-104? Really don't want to mess this up since it's a $2.3M credit facility.
Join the conversation
Quick question - for the $2.3M facility, are you doing a single UCC-1 or separate filings for each type of collateral? The equipment vs inventory distinction might matter for the collateral description.
Planning on a single comprehensive filing with detailed collateral descriptions for both equipment and inventory. Should be fine under 9-104 since it's all one debtor in one filing state.
That should work fine. Just make sure your collateral descriptions are specific enough to satisfy Delaware's requirements.
Bottom line - Delaware filing is definitely correct under UCC 9-104. I'd also recommend double-checking your collateral descriptions and debtor name formatting before submitting. Maybe run it through one of those document verification tools to catch any issues beforehand.
Good luck with the filing! Delaware usually processes pretty quickly so you should have confirmation well before your closing deadline.
Let us know how it goes. Always interested to hear about successful multistate filings.
Indiana SOS UCC search showing wrong debtor name - filing rejected twice
Has anyone dealt with the Indiana Secretary of State UCC search system returning inconsistent debtor information? I'm trying to file a UCC-1 for a commercial equipment loan but the SOS database is showing a slightly different version of our borrower's legal name than what's on their Articles of Incorporation. The automated system rejected our first filing because of a 'debtor name mismatch' and now I'm stuck in this loop where I can't tell which version is actually correct in their system. The borrower is 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' on their charter documents but the Indiana SOS UCC search is pulling up 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' with a comma. This seems like a small difference but apparently it's enough to trigger rejections. I've spent hours going through their online portal trying different name variations and I'm getting nowhere. Our loan closing is scheduled for next week and this UCC filing needs to be perfected before we can fund. Anyone know how to navigate these Indiana SOS quirks or have experience with similar debtor name issues in their system?
Join the conversation
For what it's worth, I always do my Indiana UCC searches at the beginning of the week. Their system seems more reliable on Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Fridays are terrible for timeouts and errors.
That's actually a good tip! I never thought about timing affecting the system performance.
Monday mornings are also bad because everyone's trying to file after the weekend. Weekday afternoons work best for me.
Update: I ended up using the Certana document checker that several people mentioned and it immediately caught the comma issue plus two other small discrepancies I hadn't noticed. Filed successfully this morning using their recommendations and got acceptance confirmation within an hour. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this forum saved my loan closing!
Great outcome! Always nice when a thread has a happy ending. Indiana UCC filings can be tricky but sounds like you got it sorted.
Thanks for posting the update. I'm bookmarking this thread for future reference - the name matching tips will definitely be useful.
Utah UCC search showing old termination - is my lien still active?
Been pulling my hair out trying to figure out if my UCC lien is still valid. Did a utah ucc search on the SOS website and found something weird. I filed a UCC-1 back in 2019 on some equipment financing, then filed a continuation in 2024 to keep it active. But when I search now, it's showing a termination from 2023 that I never filed! The debtor name matches exactly (checked 3 times) and the filing number is correct. Has anyone seen this before? I'm worried the lien got terminated somehow without my knowledge and now I'm unsecured. The original loan is still active and borrower is still making payments. Should I file a new UCC-1 or is there a way to challenge this termination? Really need help here because this is a $250K equipment loan and I can't afford to be unsecured.
Join the conversation
Update us when you find out who filed that termination. I'm curious if this is becoming a pattern with certain law firms or if it's just random fraud.
Will do. I'm calling the SOS office tomorrow morning to request the actual termination document. This is really stressing me out.
I understand the stress. Just remember you have options - UCC-5 correction, new UCC-1 filing, or legal action if it's fraud. You're not helpless here.
This thread is making me want to audit all my UCC filings. Anyone know if there's a bulk way to verify multiple filings at once rather than checking each one individually?
Perfect, that's exactly what I need. Manual checking is taking me forever and I keep making mistakes.
I just do batch searches on the SOS website. Not as thorough but at least I can see if anything obvious is wrong.
Gabrielle Dubois
The key thing is making sure your UCC collateral description doesn't conflict with what's actually in your loan agreement. Sometimes lawyers get creative with the UCC language and it doesn't match the security agreement terms exactly.
0 coins
Gabrielle Dubois
Exactly. The UCC description should be broad enough to be effective but consistent enough with your loan docs that there's no question about what collateral you're claiming.
0 coins
KylieRose
This is exactly what the Certana tool helps with - it flags those kinds of inconsistencies automatically so you don't have to do the line-by-line comparison manually.
0 coins
Tyrone Johnson
Quick update - took everyone's advice and rewrote the collateral description with specific equipment categories and removed the conditional language. Also used the Certana verification tool to make sure everything matched our loan docs. Filing was accepted this morning! Thanks for all the help.
0 coins
Aisha Patel
Perfect timing with your closing next week. Nothing worse than UCC filing delays holding up a loan closing.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
This gives me hope for my inventory filing. Going to try the specific categories approach too.
0 coins