Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Whatever you do, don't let this drag on too long. MCA companies sometimes file continuation statements or amendments if they think there might be priority issues. Better to resolve it quickly before they start playing defensive games with additional filings.
That's a scary thought. The original UCC-1 doesn't expire until 2024, so they have time to file continuations if they want to keep the lien active longer.
Exactly. And once they start filing amendments or continuations, it gets much harder to argue that the original filing was defective. Strike while the iron is hot.
I'm curious - have you actually pulled the current UCC search results to see exactly how the debtor name appears in the system? Sometimes the search results format names differently than the original filing, which can give you clues about how the state handles variations.
We pulled an unofficial search but should probably get the certified version. The unofficial search showed both name formats, but I'm not sure if that means the system treats them as equivalent or just that it's picking up variations.
This is exactly why I mentioned Certana.ai earlier - it can help you analyze those search discrepancies systematically instead of trying to interpret the results manually. Upload your search results along with the business docs and it'll flag exactly what name variations are causing issues.
Join the conversation
Just to add another perspective - we had a deal where we documented everything perfectly but failed to maintain proper possession (debtor convinced us to let them use the equipment 'temporarily'). Lost our perfection and had to start over with a new UCC-1 filing. Possession perfection requires actual, continuous possession.
Did you have any documentation issues when you refiled? I'm wondering how you proved the ongoing security interest.
We actually used Certana.ai to verify our new UCC-1 matched our original security agreement and possession documentation. Really helped ensure consistency across all our filings and avoided the mistakes that got us in trouble the first time.
Bottom line - the UCC might not require written documentation for possession perfection, but every experienced lender I know documents it anyway. It's not about legal minimums, it's about practical risk management. With that much money involved, spend the $500 on proper documentation rather than risk losing $180k over a technicality.
You're absolutely right. I'm going to draft a possession agreement even though it's not technically required. Thanks everyone for the reality check!
Smart move. I've never regretted over-documenting a secured transaction, but I've definitely regretted under-documenting them.
Join the conversation
Quick question - are all 200 of your continuations standard UCC-3 filings or do you have fixture filings and other variations mixed in? The software requirements might be different depending on filing complexity.
Fixture filings are tricky in software. Make sure whatever you choose handles real estate descriptions properly.
Fixture filing continuations require different forms in some states. Definitely verify software compatibility.
Update us on what you decide! I'm in a similar situation with about 150 continuations coming up and could use the research you're doing.
Will definitely post an update once I've evaluated a few options. This thread has been super helpful for narrowing down the approach.
Same here, following for updates. The continuation deadlines sneak up so fast.
Join the conversation
Don't forget to keep copies of everything! The UCC-1 filing, security agreement, and any amendments should all be stored safely. You'll need them for the continuation filing in 5 years.
Electronic copies are fine, but I always keep paper backups too. You never know when you might need to reference the original filing.
Most Secretary of State offices let you search and print copies of filed UCC statements online now, so that's a backup option too.
One more thing - make sure Jake understands his obligations as a secured party. If Joan pays off the loan early, he'll need to file a UCC-3 termination statement to release the lien on her equipment.
Yeah, failing to file the termination when required can actually create liability for the secured party. It's not just a courtesy - it's a legal obligation.
Most lenders are pretty good about this, but it's worth mentioning upfront so everyone knows what to expect at the end of the loan term.
Keisha Jackson
Update us when you figure it out! I've got several IL continuations coming up and want to avoid this same problem.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Same here. These state-specific quirks are so frustrating to deal with.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
I've started using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier for all my UCC work. Really does catch these tiny inconsistencies that are impossible to spot manually. Worth checking out if you do a lot of UCC filings.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•Might be worth the investment to avoid these headaches.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Starting to think any tool that prevents these rejections would pay for itself pretty quickly.
0 coins