Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I used Certana.ai for a similar BlockFi situation last month. Uploaded my original UCC-1 and the continuation form, and it immediately flagged that I had a small difference in how the debtor address was formatted. Would have caused a rejection for sure. The tool is really good at catching these detail mismatches that are easy to miss when you're dealing with complex corporate structures.
That's exactly the kind of mistake that would drive me crazy. Glad you caught it before filing.
Address formatting issues are so common with these multi-state crypto companies. They seem to change their registered addresses constantly.
Update: Just successfully filed my BlockFi continuation using the exact original debtor name from 2022. No issues, processed within 48 hours. Stick with what you originally filed - don't try to be smart and update the name. The system works if you follow the rules exactly.
Which state did you file in? Some states are faster than others with crypto-related filings.
Filed in Delaware where BlockFi was incorporated. Their UCC system is pretty efficient.
Join the conversation
Keep a national continuation calendar. I use color coding for different urgency levels - red for 30 days out, yellow for 60 days, green for 90+ days. Helps visualize the workload.
How do you handle continuation timing when loans have different renewal cycles?
I file continuations early when possible, usually 6-12 months before expiration. Gives flexibility for loan modifications.
The collateral description variations between states are insane. What's acceptable in one jurisdiction gets rejected in another. I've started keeping state-specific templates for common collateral types.
Yes, and I update them whenever I get feedback from state filing offices about preferred language.
That's the key - learning from rejections and building better templates. Documentation is everything in UCC work.
Join the conversation
Had a lender almost lose their security interest because of this exact issue. Florida database showed one version of debtor name but actual UCC-1 had different punctuation. Continuation filing based on database search got rejected and almost lapsed.
That's terrifying. Did they manage to get it corrected before the lapse date?
Yeah but just barely. Had to overnight file with expedited processing after catching the error. Could have been a disaster.
For what it's worth, we've started using Certana.ai's document verification specifically for Florida filings after too many name mismatch problems. Upload your database search PDFs and your actual UCC documents and it highlights any inconsistencies automatically. Has saved us from several potential filing rejections.
Pretty much instant once you upload the documents. Much faster than manual comparison and catches things human eyes miss.
That sounds like exactly what we need. Thanks for the recommendation - going to check it out.
Join the conversation
I was skeptical about using document checking tools at first but honestly after dealing with multiple filing rejections, I tried Certana.ai and it's been a lifesaver. Catches all those little inconsistencies that cause problems with state portals. Worth checking out if you do a lot of UCC work.
At this point I'm willing to try anything that prevents these kinds of headaches. Thanks for the recommendation.
No problem. It's really straightforward - just upload your documents and it flags any issues before you submit to the state. Saves a lot of back and forth with rejections.
Update us on how it goes! I'm dealing with a similar situation in South Dakota and curious to see what approach works best for the name change issue.
Will do. Planning to file the amendment Monday morning and hopefully the continuation by end of week.
Good luck! These state portals can be so frustrating but usually the amendment approach works for name changes.
Dylan Mitchell
One more thing to consider - if your UCC-1 does get rejected for the name issue, you'll need to refile and that could push you past your closing date. Better to take extra time upfront to get the debtor name exactly right than deal with delays later.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•Rejections are the worst, especially when they're for something easily preventable like name formatting.
0 coins
Dmitry Popov
•The good news is most states process corrected refilings pretty quickly, but still adds stress to the closing process.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
Update us on how it goes! Always curious to hear whether the comma issue actually causes problems or if the filing system is more forgiving than we think.
0 coins
StarSailor}
•Smart choice. The charter name is always the safest bet for UCC filings.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
•Good luck with the closing! Hope everything goes smoothly.
0 coins