UCC definition of buyer causing issues with our equipment lease termination
We're dealing with a messy situation where our equipment financing company is claiming we don't qualify as a 'buyer' under UCC Article 9 when we're trying to terminate our lease early and purchase the equipment outright. The original UCC-1 filing shows us as debtor for the lease, but now they're saying because we were lessees initially, we can't be considered buyers for the purchase transaction. This is holding up our ability to get clear title and it's affecting our ability to get new financing lined up. Has anyone dealt with the UCC definition of buyer in a lease-to-purchase scenario? The equipment is worth about $180K and we need to close this out before our fiscal year end. Are there specific UCC provisions that define when a lessee becomes a buyer?
36 comments
Join the conversation
GalacticGuru
The UCC definition of buyer is pretty specific - it's someone who buys or contracts to buy goods. In your lease situation, you'd become a buyer when you exercise the purchase option, not before. The original UCC-1 filing as lessee doesn't prevent you from later becoming a buyer.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
•This is exactly right. UCC 1-201 defines buyer, and lease vs purchase are separate transactions even if they're related.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•But doesn't the timing matter? Like when exactly does the status change from lessee to buyer?
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
I had a similar issue last year with construction equipment. The finance company was being difficult about the definition too. What helped was getting the purchase agreement drafted properly to clearly establish buyer status under UCC definitions.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•What specific language did you use in the purchase agreement? Our lawyers are struggling with this.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•We made sure it explicitly stated we were purchasing the goods and referenced UCC Article 2 buyer protections. Also had to amend the original UCC-1.
0 coins
Diego Vargas
Honestly, I've seen finance companies play games with UCC definitions to avoid releasing liens. They know most people don't understand the technical distinctions between buyer, lessee, debtor, etc. You might need to push back harder on their interpretation.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•So frustrating when they do this! The UCC is supposed to make these transactions smoother, not more complicated.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Have you tried uploading your lease agreement and UCC filings to something like Certana.ai? Their document checker can verify if there are any inconsistencies in how buyer/debtor status is defined across your documents. Might help you spot what the finance company is nitpicking about.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
The UCC definition of buyer under 1-201(b)(9) is 'a person that buys or contracts to buy goods.' Key thing is the purchase agreement language. If your lease had a purchase option, exercising it should make you a buyer. The finance company might be confused about UCC vs common law definitions.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
•This is the most accurate explanation. UCC buyer definition is pretty straightforward - it's about the contract to buy goods.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•Our lease did have a purchase option. We exercised it 60 days ago but they're still dragging their feet on the title transfer.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•60 days is way too long for a simple purchase option exercise. Something else is going on here.
0 coins
Nia Jackson
Wait, are you sure this is about the buyer definition and not about the UCC-1 termination process? Sometimes finance companies use confusing language when they really mean the UCC filing procedures are holding things up.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•They specifically mentioned 'buyer status under UCC' in their rejection letter. But you might be right about the real issue being filing procedures.
0 coins
Mateo Hernandez
•I bet they need a UCC-3 termination statement filed and they're using buyer definition as an excuse for delays.
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
Had this exact situation with office equipment lease. Finance company kept saying we weren't 'buyers' until I showed them UCC 2A-103 which covers lease transactions vs UCC Article 2 sales. Different sections but both recognize buyer status when purchase occurs.
0 coins
Aisha Khan
•Good point about UCC 2A vs Article 2. Most people don't realize leases have their own UCC section.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
•This is getting complicated. Maybe the original poster should just get a UCC attorney involved at this point?
0 coins
Yuki Ito
I'm dealing with something similar right now. The UCC definition of buyer seems clear enough, but these finance companies have their own interpretations. I actually ran my documents through Certana.ai's verification tool and it caught a discrepancy in how buyer vs debtor was defined between my original lease and purchase agreement. Turned out the finance company was right to question it.
0 coins
Carmen Lopez
•That's actually pretty smart to double-check the document consistency. These UCC definitions can be tricky across multiple agreements.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•Interesting - what kind of discrepancy did it find?
0 coins
Yuki Ito
•The purchase agreement referred to me as 'purchaser' while the lease had 'lessee' and somehow that was creating confusion about my buyer status under UCC definitions.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
UCC buyer definition is in section 1-201(b)(9) like someone mentioned, but also check if your state has any variations. Some states have slightly different interpretations of buyer status in lease-purchase scenarios.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Most states follow the uniform version though. State variations are usually minor for basic definitions like buyer.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
•Still worth checking though. UCC variations can be subtle but important.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
This might be overthinking it. If you exercised a purchase option, you're a buyer. Period. The finance company might just be stalling for some other reason - cash flow, internal procedures, whatever. Push them for a specific legal citation if they think you're not a buyer under UCC.
0 coins
Mei Lin
•Yeah, demand they cite the specific UCC section they think prevents buyer status. Bet they can't.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Sometimes these companies just hope you'll give up and they can keep collecting lease payments longer.
0 coins
Amara Nnamani
One more thing to consider - make sure your purchase agreement actually creates buyer status under UCC vs just an option to buy. There's a technical difference between contracting to buy (which makes you a buyer) vs having the right to buy (which doesn't until exercised).
0 coins
Giovanni Mancini
•This is a really good point. The UCC definition of buyer requires actually contracting to buy goods, not just having an option.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•We definitely exercised the option and signed a purchase agreement. So we should be buyers under the UCC definition.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Then the finance company is just being difficult. You might want to get your lawyer to send them a demand letter citing UCC 1-201(b)(9).
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
Update us on how this resolves! These UCC buyer definition disputes are becoming more common as equipment financing gets more complex. Would be helpful to know what finally worked for you.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•Will do. Planning to have our attorney send a formal demand letter this week referencing the specific UCC sections mentioned here.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Good luck! The UCC buyer definition should be on your side if you have a proper purchase agreement.
0 coins