< Back to UCC Document Community

Harper Collins

Can you sell an asset with a UCC lien - equipment buyer backing out

So I'm in a bind here. Got a manufacturing equipment deal that's been months in the making, and now the buyer is getting cold feet because they found out there's still an active UCC-1 filing on the machinery. The lien holder is my original equipment finance company - I've been paying on time for 3 years, about 18 months left on the note. Buyer's attorney is telling them they can't close until the UCC is terminated, but that would mean I'd have to pay off the entire $180K balance upfront which defeats the whole purpose of this sale. The equipment is worth way more than what I owe, and I was planning to use sale proceeds to satisfy the lien at closing. Is this normal? Can you actually sell equipment that still has a UCC filing against it, or does the lien have to be cleared first? This is holding up a $320K transaction and I'm starting to panic.

You absolutely can sell assets with UCC liens - happens all the time in commercial transactions. The key is proper coordination at closing. Your title company or closing attorney should handle the lien payoff as part of the sale proceeds distribution. The UCC-1 doesn't prevent the sale, it just needs to be addressed in the purchase agreement.

0 coins

This is correct. We do equipment sales with existing liens regularly. Just make sure your purchase agreement specifically addresses the lien payoff procedure and who's responsible for the UCC-3 termination filing.

0 coins

Wait, so the buyer's attorney doesn't know this? That seems like a red flag about their experience with secured transactions.

0 coins

Your buyer's attorney is being overly cautious or doesn't handle equipment finance deals often. Standard practice is to structure the closing so lien payoff comes directly from sale proceeds. You'll need a payoff letter from your lender showing exact amount due as of closing date, then the closing agent distributes funds accordingly - lender gets paid, UCC gets terminated, you get the balance.

0 coins

Exactly this. The payoff letter is crucial - it should include per diem interest calculations and specify that it's good for X number of days.

0 coins

Also make sure the purchase agreement requires the seller to provide a UCC-3 termination statement within 30 days of payoff. Some lenders are slow with this.

0 coins

Had a similar situation last year where we almost lost a deal because of lien confusion. Ended up using Certana.ai to verify all our UCC documents were consistent before closing - uploaded our original UCC-1, the payoff calculation, and draft purchase agreement. Caught a discrepancy in the debtor name that would have delayed everything. Really saved us from a nightmare.

0 coins

Been doing equipment sales for 15+ years. This is routine stuff. The UCC lien travels with the equipment until it's satisfied, but that doesn't prevent sale. Your closing documents should include: 1) Payoff letter from current lien holder, 2) Instructions for fund distribution, 3) UCC-3 termination to be filed post-closing, 4) Clear title transfer to buyer. If the buyer's attorney doesn't understand this basic commercial transaction structure, maybe they need to consult with someone who handles secured transactions regularly.

0 coins

Agree completely. Sounds like buyer's counsel needs education on UCC Article 9. This is not complex stuff.

0 coins

The scary part is how many attorneys don't understand basic secured transaction law. We see this constantly in deals.

0 coins

OMG YES you can sell with liens! I was in almost identical situation 6 months ago - had $240K in equipment with $160K still owed. Buyer initially freaked about the UCC filing too. Here's what we did: Got a 10-day payoff letter from the finance company, structured closing through a commercial title company, and they handled everything. Finance company got paid directly from closing proceeds, filed the UCC-3 termination within a week, buyer got clear title, I got my equity. Smooth as butter once we got the right people involved.

0 coins

Which title company did you use? We're looking for one that actually understands equipment transactions.

0 coins

The 10-day payoff letter is key - gives you enough time to close without worrying about daily interest calculations changing the amount.

0 coins

Your buyer's attorney is wrong and creating unnecessary obstacles. UCC liens don't prevent sales - they're just secured interests that need to be satisfied. This is like saying you can't sell a house with a mortgage. The mortgage gets paid off at closing from sale proceeds, same concept applies to UCC liens on equipment. You need a more experienced closing agent who understands secured transactions.

0 coins

Great analogy with the house mortgage. Really puts it in perspective for people who don't deal with UCC regularly.

0 coins

Seriously, if their attorney doesn't know this, what else are they going to mess up? Might want to suggest they get different counsel.

0 coins

We actually ran into something similar where the buyer's attorney was creating problems. Used Certana.ai to verify our UCC-1 matched our equipment schedule perfectly and the debtor name was consistent across all documents. Having that verification helped us push back when they claimed there were 'discrepancies' that needed resolution.

0 coins

This is making me nervous about my own upcoming equipment sale. I have two UCC-1 filings on different pieces of equipment from different lenders. Both pieces are being sold as a package deal. Do I need separate payoff letters for each lien? And what if one lender is faster than the other with the UCC-3 termination?

0 coins

Yes, you'll need separate payoff letters for each lien since they're different lenders. Your closing agent should handle the coordination.

0 coins

The termination timing shouldn't matter as long as both payoffs happen at closing. The UCC-3 filings can happen days or weeks later.

0 coins

Update: talked to my lender this morning and they confirmed what everyone here is saying. They handle lien payoffs from sale proceeds all the time. Getting a payoff letter today and forwarding to the closing attorney. Buyer's counsel still seems hesitant but at least now I have ammunition to push back. Thanks for the reality check everyone - was starting to think I was crazy!

0 coins

Good news! Make sure that payoff letter includes specific language about UCC-3 termination timing commitments.

0 coins

Glad it's working out. This is exactly why forums like this are valuable - real experience from people who've actually done these deals.

0 coins

Just want to add - make sure your purchase agreement specifically states that all liens will be satisfied from closing proceeds and that clear title will be delivered. Also include penalties if the seller doesn't provide UCC-3 terminations within specified timeframe. Protects both parties.

0 coins

Great point about the penalties clause. We learned that lesson the hard way when a lender took 45 days to file the termination.

0 coins

Been lurking here for months but had to chime in - went through almost identical situation last fall. $400K crane sale with $220K lien balance. Buyer's bank initially balked at the UCC filing but once we showed them the standard closing structure with lien payoff, they were fine. Sometimes it's not the attorneys, it's the lenders who don't understand commercial equipment transactions.

0 coins

That's a good point - sometimes the problem is the buyer's financing source, not their legal counsel.

0 coins

We had a situation where three different parties were all looking at the same UCC documents and coming to different conclusions about what was owed and to whom. Finally used Certana.ai's document checker to upload everything and get a clean verification that all the numbers and names matched up correctly. Really helped get everyone on the same page quickly.

0 coins

Final update - closed successfully yesterday! Lender payoff went smoothly, UCC-3 termination was filed same day (apparently they have an automated system now), and buyer got clear title. Total process took 12 days once we got the right closing agent involved. Buyer's original attorney ended up referring us to someone with more equipment finance experience, which made all the difference. Thanks again everyone for the guidance and reality check!

0 coins

Fantastic outcome! Glad it worked out and you didn't have to pay off the entire balance upfront.

0 coins

This thread should be required reading for anyone doing equipment sales. Great real-world example of how these transactions actually work.

0 coins

Love a happy ending! Congrats on getting it closed.

0 coins

Congrats on getting this resolved! This is such a valuable thread for anyone dealing with UCC liens on equipment sales. I'm bookmarking this for future reference. It really highlights how important it is to work with professionals who understand secured transactions - sounds like finding that experienced closing agent made all the difference. The fact that your lender had an automated UCC-3 termination system is impressive too. Thanks for sharing the full journey from problem to solution!

0 coins

Absolutely agree - this whole thread is a masterclass in UCC transactions! As someone new to equipment financing, I'm amazed at how straightforward this process actually is once you have the right team in place. The mortgage analogy really clicked for me too. It's eye-opening to see how many attorneys apparently don't understand these basic secured transaction concepts. Definitely saving this thread for when I eventually need to navigate my own equipment sale. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences!

0 coins

This entire thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who's just starting to work with equipment financing, I had no idea that UCC liens were so commonly handled through closing proceeds. The real-world examples everyone shared really demystified what seemed like a complex legal issue. It's concerning how many attorneys apparently don't understand basic UCC Article 9 principles - makes you wonder what other "standard" commercial practices they might get wrong. The mortgage analogy was particularly helpful for understanding the concept. Definitely going to keep this thread handy for future reference, and it sounds like finding the right closing agent who specializes in secured transactions is absolutely critical. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and congratulations to those who got their deals closed successfully!

0 coins

Totally agree! This thread has been like a crash course in UCC transactions. I'm fairly new to commercial lending and had always assumed UCC liens were these complicated barriers to sales. Seeing how routine this actually is for experienced professionals is reassuring. The part about attorneys not understanding Article 9 basics is pretty scary though - makes me think we all need to be more careful about vetting legal counsel for these deals. I'm definitely going to ask more pointed questions about UCC experience before hiring anyone for equipment transactions. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed real-world examples!

0 coins

This has been such an enlightening discussion! As someone relatively new to equipment financing, I had no idea how standard these UCC lien payoffs through closing proceeds actually are. The comparison to mortgage payoffs at real estate closings really made it click for me. What's most striking is how many legal professionals seem unfamiliar with basic UCC Article 9 procedures - it makes me wonder how many deals get unnecessarily complicated or even killed because of this knowledge gap. I'm definitely going to use this thread as a reference guide and make sure any attorneys I work with have solid experience in secured transactions. Really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences and outcomes - it's invaluable learning for those of us still figuring out the commercial equipment space!

0 coins

This thread really should be required reading for anyone entering the equipment finance space! What strikes me most is how this "complex" legal issue turned out to be completely routine once the right professionals got involved. The knowledge gap among attorneys is genuinely concerning - it makes you realize how important it is to specifically ask about UCC and secured transaction experience upfront. I'm also impressed by how helpful this community is with sharing real experiences rather than just theoretical advice. Definitely saving this entire discussion as a reference guide for future equipment deals!

0 coins

This thread is absolutely gold for anyone dealing with equipment financing! As someone who's still learning the ropes in this space, I had no clue that UCC lien payoffs at closing were so standard. The mortgage comparison really drove the point home - it's such a perfect analogy. What's honestly shocking is how many attorneys seem to lack basic knowledge of UCC Article 9. Makes me think we should all be asking very specific questions about secured transaction experience before engaging legal counsel. I'm bookmarking this entire discussion - the real-world examples and step-by-step breakdowns are incredibly valuable. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences, especially those who followed up with their outcomes. This is exactly the kind of practical knowledge you can't get from textbooks!

0 coins

This thread has been an absolute masterclass in UCC transactions! As a newcomer to equipment financing, I was completely unaware that lien payoffs through closing proceeds were such standard practice. The mortgage analogy really crystallized the concept for me - it's amazing how something that initially seemed so complex is actually routine business. What's genuinely alarming is discovering how many attorneys lack fundamental UCC Article 9 knowledge. It really emphasizes the importance of thoroughly vetting legal counsel's secured transaction experience before engaging them. I'm definitely saving this entire thread as my go-to reference guide. The combination of practical advice, real-world examples, and actual deal outcomes makes this incredibly valuable learning material that you simply can't find in academic sources. Thank you to everyone who took the time to share their experiences and expertise!

0 coins

What an incredible educational journey this thread has been! As someone just getting started in commercial equipment transactions, I had absolutely no idea that UCC lien payoffs through closing proceeds were not only possible but completely routine. The mortgage payoff analogy was brilliant - it instantly made the whole process click for me. What's genuinely concerning is learning how many attorneys apparently lack basic UCC Article 9 knowledge. This thread has definitely taught me to ask very specific questions about secured transaction experience before hiring legal counsel for any equipment deals. The step-by-step breakdown of the closing process, the importance of payoff letters with per diem calculations, and the UCC-3 termination procedures - this is exactly the kind of practical knowledge that's impossible to find in textbooks. I'm saving this entire discussion as my reference guide. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences, especially those who followed up with successful outcomes. This community is invaluable for learning how these transactions actually work in the real world!

0 coins

This thread has been such a valuable learning experience for me too! As someone completely new to equipment financing, I was initially intimidated by the whole UCC concept, but seeing how systematically everyone broke down the process has been incredibly reassuring. The fact that this is just standard commercial practice once you have knowledgeable professionals involved really puts things in perspective. What really stands out to me is how the community came together to help solve what seemed like a crisis situation - it shows the power of experienced practitioners sharing real-world knowledge. I'm definitely going to reference this thread when I eventually need to navigate my own equipment transactions. Thanks to everyone for making such a complex topic accessible to newcomers like us!

0 coins

This entire discussion has been incredibly enlightening for someone new to equipment financing like myself! I had no idea that UCC lien payoffs through closing proceeds were not only standard practice but essentially how most secured equipment transactions work. The mortgage analogy really made everything click - of course you can sell equipment with liens, just like you can sell real estate with mortgages. What's genuinely troubling is discovering how many attorneys seem unfamiliar with basic UCC Article 9 principles. This thread has taught me that I need to specifically vet legal counsel's secured transaction experience rather than just assuming they understand commercial equipment deals. The practical details everyone shared - payoff letters with per diem calculations, fund distribution instructions, UCC-3 termination timing, proper closing coordination - this is the real-world knowledge you can't get from textbooks. I'm definitely bookmarking this entire thread as my reference guide for future equipment transactions. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences, especially those who provided updates on successful closings. This community is invaluable for understanding how these deals actually work in practice!

0 coins

This thread has been an absolute goldmine of practical knowledge! As someone brand new to the equipment financing world, I was completely overwhelmed by the UCC terminology and process, but everyone's real-world examples have made it so much clearer. The mortgage comparison was particularly helpful - it's such a simple way to understand what initially seemed like a complex legal barrier. What really strikes me is how this "crisis" situation turned out to be completely normal business once experienced professionals got involved. The knowledge gap among some attorneys is definitely eye-opening and will definitely influence how I vet legal counsel going forward. I'm amazed at how generous this community is with sharing detailed experiences and actual outcomes. This thread is going straight into my bookmarks as essential reference material for when I eventually navigate my own equipment deals. Thank you to everyone for turning what could have been a dry legal discussion into such an accessible learning experience!

0 coins

This thread has been absolutely invaluable as someone just entering the equipment financing space! I had no clue that UCC lien payoffs through closing proceeds were standard practice - I always assumed liens had to be cleared before any sale could happen. The mortgage analogy really drove it home for me. What's most eye-opening is seeing how many attorneys apparently don't grasp basic UCC Article 9 concepts. This discussion has definitely taught me to ask very specific questions about secured transaction experience when vetting legal counsel for equipment deals. The step-by-step breakdown of payoff letters, closing coordination, and UCC-3 termination procedures is exactly the kind of practical knowledge you can't find in textbooks. I'm saving this entire thread as my go-to reference guide. Thanks to everyone for sharing their real-world experiences and congratulations to those who successfully closed their deals!

0 coins

This thread really has been like a crash course in UCC fundamentals! What amazes me most is how something that seemed so legally complex at first - selling equipment with active liens - turns out to be completely routine once you understand the mechanics. The mortgage comparison was brilliant and really helped me grasp the concept immediately. I'm also shocked at how many legal professionals apparently lack basic Article 9 knowledge - it definitely makes me realize I need to be much more specific when asking about secured transaction experience. The detailed breakdown everyone provided about payoff procedures, closing coordination, and termination filing requirements is pure gold for newcomers like us. Definitely saving this as essential reference material for future deals!

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today