UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Make sure you keep copies of everything including the exact form version you used. If there are ever any questions later about the filing, you'll want to be able to show exactly what was submitted. I keep both electronic and paper copies of all UCC filings for my clients.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the help. I feel much more confident about getting this filing done correctly now. Going to download the current form from the CA SOS site and double-check everything before submitting.

0 coins

Good luck with your filing! Remember to verify that debtor name against the official records and you should be fine. California's system is pretty user-friendly once you have all the right information.

0 coins

Just wanted to add one more tip from my experience - when you're describing manufacturing equipment in the collateral section, consider using broader language like "all manufacturing equipment now owned or hereafter acquired" if your lender agrees. This can provide better coverage if you add equipment later without needing to file amendments. Also, if any of your equipment has existing liens or lease obligations, make sure to coordinate with those lenders to avoid conflicts. California's UCC search system makes it easy to check for existing filings before you submit yours.

0 coins

That's excellent advice about the broader collateral description language! I hadn't thought about future equipment acquisitions. Quick question - if I use language like "all manufacturing equipment now owned or hereafter acquired," does that automatically cover equipment purchased after the UCC1 filing date, or do I need to file an amendment when new equipment is added? Also, how do I check for existing liens on the equipment through California's search system?

0 coins

I actually ran into a similar document verification issue recently and ended up trying that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Really handy for these situations where you're not sure if contract language affects filing requirements. Just upload both documents and it highlights any potential conflicts or missing elements.

0 coins

Two people mentioning the same tool - must be worth checking out. Thanks for the recommendation.

0 coins

I'm always skeptical of these automated tools but document verification does sound useful for complex agreements.

0 coins

As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been really helpful! I'm dealing with my first commercial security agreement that has similar non-negotiable non-transferable language and was getting confused about whether it needed special handling. Sounds like the consensus is that these are just contractual terms between the parties and don't affect the actual UCC-1 filing requirements. I appreciate everyone sharing their experience - it's reassuring to know that even with 15+ years of filing experience, people see this language regularly and handle it the same way. Going to stick with the standard equipment description approach and not overthink it!

0 coins

Just want to echo what others have said about being extra careful with debtor names and addresses. I've been filing UCCs in Texas for about 8 years now and the rejection rate for name/address errors seems to have gotten stricter lately. The $15 fee is definitely still current - I filed three UCC-1s last week and all were $15 each. One tip I'd add is to always double-check that your debtor's legal name exactly matches what's on their articles of incorporation or organization. Even something like "Inc." vs "Incorporated" can cause a rejection. Good luck with your filing!

0 coins

Thanks for that insight about Texas getting stricter on name/address rejections lately! As someone new to UCC filings, I really appreciate the tip about matching exactly with incorporation documents. It sounds like even small formatting differences can be costly. The 8 years of experience definitely shows - I'll make sure to be extra meticulous with the debtor information before submitting.

0 coins

As a newcomer to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly informative! I'm planning my first Texas UCC-1 filing next month and had no idea about some of these potential pitfalls. The $15 fee seems very reasonable compared to what I've heard about other states. I'm definitely going to take everyone's advice about being extra careful with debtor names and building in buffer time for processing. Quick question - for someone doing their first filing, would you recommend having an experienced attorney review the UCC-1 before submission, or is the online portal pretty straightforward once you have all the correct information?

0 coins

Welcome to UCC filings! The Texas portal is actually pretty user-friendly once you get the hang of it. For your first filing, I'd say it depends on the complexity of your transaction and your comfort level. If it's a straightforward equipment loan with a standard debtor name and clear collateral description, the portal walks you through each step pretty well. But if there are any complexities - like multiple debtors, unusual collateral, or you're unsure about the legal entity name - having an attorney review it first could save you the $15 rejection fee and potential delays. Many of us here learned through trial and error, but there's definitely value in getting it right the first time!

0 coins

One option you might consider is reaching out to the FDIC or your state's banking department to see if they have records of who assumed the defunct lender's obligations. When financial institutions close, there's usually a formal process for transferring or winding down their secured transactions. They might be able to connect you with the right entity or provide guidance on state-specific procedures for situations exactly like yours. Also, some states have streamlined processes for debtors in your situation - worth checking your Secretary of State's UCC division for any special provisions when the original secured party is no longer available.

0 coins

This is really comprehensive advice! I hadn't thought about the FDIC angle - that could be a great starting point since they would have detailed records of the closure process. The streamlined state procedures you mentioned sound promising too. I'm going to start with the Secretary of State's UCC division first since that seems like the most direct path, then escalate to the banking department if needed. Thanks for laying out such a clear roadmap!

0 coins

I went through this exact situation last year when my equipment lender got bought out and the new company had no interest in handling old UCC terminations. What ended up working for me was filing a petition with the court under UCC Section 9-509(d)(2) - most states have provisions that allow debtors to request termination when the secured party is unavailable or uncooperative. You'll need rock-solid documentation showing full payment and evidence that you've made good faith efforts to contact the original secured party. The whole process took about 6 weeks and cost around $800 in filing fees and legal prep, but it was worth it to get that lien off my record. Before going the legal route though, definitely try calling your state's UCC filing office directly - sometimes they have informal procedures for these situations that can save you time and money.

0 coins

Update: I went ahead and filed with the current legal name as shown on the SCC website. Used Certana.ai first to double-check everything and it confirmed the name discrepancy between my loan docs and the state records. Filed this morning and it was accepted within a few hours. Thanks everyone for the advice!

0 coins

Awesome that Certana helped catch that beforehand. Saves so much headache compared to dealing with rejections after the fact.

0 coins

Perfect outcome. Now you know the process for next time too.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm new to UCC filings and had no idea about the current legal name requirement vs. what's on loan documents. Question for those with experience - is there a standard timeframe for when you should check the state records before filing? Like if I pulled the SCC info a week ago, should I check again right before filing to make sure nothing changed in the meantime?

0 coins

Prev1...4546474849...684Next