UCC Document Community

UPDATE: Called Regional Credit Corp and demanded the UCC-3 filing number. After 2 hours on hold, they admitted they never actually filed the assignment! They're rushing to file it today but now I'm worried about the timing for our closing. This is exactly why secured party searches exist - to catch these problems.

This is a perfect example of why I always verify UCC filings within 30 days of any assignment or transfer. Regional Credit Corp dropping the ball for 8 months is unacceptable, especially on an $850K deal. Since they're finally filing the UCC-3 now, make sure you get expedited processing if your state offers it - usually costs extra but worth it for your timeline. Also document everything about their failure to file originally in case you need to pursue damages for any closing delays or additional costs. Your new lender should definitely be putting pressure on them too since this kind of negligence reflects poorly on their servicing capabilities.

Update us when you get it figured out! I'm sure other people will run into the same character limit issues with addendums. Always helpful to know what actually works in practice vs what the instructions say.

I've dealt with this exact same issue multiple times! The character limits are incredibly frustrating. Here's what I've found works best: First, try using broader category descriptions like "Manufacturing Equipment" or "Production Machinery" instead of listing every serial number. Second, make sure you're using the attachment feature properly - most states allow you to reference "See Attachment A" in the collateral field and then include a detailed schedule as a separate page. Third, and this is crucial - verify that your debtor name matches EXACTLY with the original UCC-1, including all punctuation and spacing. Even tiny differences will cause rejections. I'd also recommend calling the Secretary of State's UCC division directly - they're usually more helpful than you'd expect and can tell you exactly what format they want. Don't let your lender pressure you into rushing this - it's better to get it right the first time than deal with priority issues later.

Ugh NY filing system strikes again. I swear they make it difficult on purpose. Hope you get it sorted out soon!

I've been through this exact nightmare with NY DOS! Here's what finally worked for me after weeks of rejections: First, do a UCC search on their website and copy the debtor name character-for-character from the search results display - that shows you exactly how it's stored in their system. Second, check for invisible characters by pasting the name into a text editor that shows whitespace/formatting marks. Third, make absolutely sure you're using the correct UCC-3 form type (addendum vs amendment). NY's system is ridiculously picky but once you get the exact match it should go through. Also double-check that your 30-day perfection window hasn't expired - you might need to expedite the filing if you're running close. Good luck!

Based on your description, I'd recommend: 1) Pull official records from SOS, 2) Verify debtor name consistency with current corporate records, 3) Trace the connection between the original filing and continuation, 4) Consider whether you need to file your own UCC-1 regardless of existing liens. Better to over-secure than under-secure.

I've been in this exact situation before and here's what worked for me: Start with the SOS portal immediately - don't wait. Even if it's slower than Westlaw, you need the official source. For the name variations, check the debtor's current Articles of Incorporation or LLC registration to see the exact legal name format. The filing number discrepancy between the original UCC-1 and continuation is a red flag - if they don't properly cross-reference, that continuation might be legally worthless. I'd also recommend calling the SOS filing office directly if you can't resolve the discrepancies online. They can often clarify whether filings are connected even when the numbers don't match perfectly. Given your timeline, consider having your attorney review the filings before closing - it's cheaper than dealing with priority disputes later.

For what it's worth, I've found that Georgia's search works better during off-peak hours. Mid-morning and late afternoon seem to give more reliable results than early morning or end of day.

Bottom line - never trust a single UCC search in Georgia. Always run multiple variations and if you're doing high-stakes due diligence, consider using a verification tool or commercial service. The stakes are too high to rely on the state's inconsistent search algorithm.