Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Lauren Wood
Just went through this exact process last month with equipment financing. The Texas SOS online filing system is pretty user-friendly once you have all your details straight. Takes about 10 minutes to complete the UCC-1 if you have everything ready.
Lauren Wood
•The hard part is getting the document details right beforehand. The actual filing is straightforward.
Ellie Lopez
•Texas charges $15 for electronic UCC-1 filings, pretty reasonable compared to some states.
One more thing about free templates - make sure they include proper default and enforcement provisions. You want clear language about what happens if the borrower doesn't pay and how you can recover the collateral.
That's wise. Even if the UCC filing is perfect, weak enforcement language in the security agreement can create problems down the road.
Self-help repossession rules vary by state too, so definitely get local legal advice on the enforcement provisions.
Join the conversation
Luca Romano
Thanks everyone for the input. Sounds like I was overthinking this - manufacturing equipment with FDA compliance requirements doesn't typically fall under federal perfection schemes. I'll proceed with standard UCC-1 filing but maybe run it through that Certana tool first for peace of mind.
Ethan Taylor
•Good plan. For a $2.8M deal, the extra verification step is worth it.
You're making the right call. 9-311 exceptions are narrow, and manufacturing equipment rarely qualifies.
I just want to add that if you do find any equipment that might fall under federal exemptions, make sure you understand the federal filing requirements completely. Some federal systems have different continuation and termination procedures than state UCC.
They vary by system, but they're definitely different. Federal aircraft liens have completely different rules than UCC continuations.
Ethan Taylor
•That's why most lenders prefer UCC-eligible collateral when possible - the procedures are standardized across states.
Join the conversation
Another option is to use one of those document verification services before filing. I recently discovered Certana.ai which lets you upload your UCC documents as PDFs and it automatically checks for consistency issues like name mismatches. Would have saved you the rejection and stress.
Two people have mentioned that service now - seems like it might be worth trying for the corrected filing.
Yeah I've heard good things about automated document checking for UCC work. Beats manually comparing everything.
Marcus Marsh
Just to confirm what others said - you absolutely must use the debtor name exactly as it appears on the original 2020 UCC-1 filing. No variations, no 'corrections' to match current documents, no formatting improvements. The continuation is tied to that specific original filing and must reference the debtor identically. Pull the original filing, copy the name precisely, and refile ASAP.
Smart move. Better to file quickly with confidence than to keep second-guessing and risk running out of time.
Exactly right. Time is critical now. Get it filed correctly and you'll be fine.
Join the conversation
Amara Okafor
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure your security agreement language matches exactly what you put in the UCC-1 collateral description. I've seen too many cases where they don't align and it creates headaches down the road.
Amara Okafor
•You can be more specific in the UCC-1 as long as it's within the scope of the security agreement. 'All business assets' would certainly cover inventory and equipment, so you're fine to break it out more specifically in the filing.
GalaxyGazer
•Actually, being more specific in the UCC-1 is usually better for perfection purposes anyway. Helps avoid questions about what exactly is covered.
Nia Harris
Thanks everyone for the input! Based on the discussion here, I'm going to go with a description that specifically breaks out: 'all inventory consisting of restaurant equipment and smallwares held for sale; all equipment consisting of restaurant equipment held for lease or rental to third parties; all accounts receivable arising from the sale or lease of such inventory and equipment; and all proceeds thereof.' Does that sound comprehensive enough while still being specific?
Agreed, that description covers all the bases we discussed. Much better than trying to cram everything into generic categories.
Amara Okafor
•Perfect. That description is specific enough to avoid ambiguity but broad enough to cover the business model. Good work!
StarStrider
Quick question - does the UCC-3 amendment affect the continuation timeline? I know UCC-1 filings need to be continued every 5 years, but wasn't sure if amendments change that schedule.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•No, amendments don't change the continuation schedule. You still need to file a UCC-3 continuation before the 5-year anniversary of the original UCC-1 filing.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Got it, thanks. So the amendment just adds to the existing filing without changing the expiration date.
0 coins
Zara Malik
One last thing to consider - if you're adding inventory to your collateral, make sure you understand the implications for future inventory turnover. Manufacturing equipment is pretty static, but inventory collateral can get complex with tracking and reporting requirements depending on your credit agreement terms.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
•Good point. The inventory component is mainly raw materials and work-in-progress, so it should be fairly manageable.
0 coins
Luca Marino
•Just make sure your borrower understands any new reporting requirements that come with the expanded collateral scope.
0 coins