Need UCC 1-308 example format for commercial loan collateral filing
Running into issues preparing a UCC-1 filing and my lender mentioned something about UCC 1-308 example documentation. We're securing a $180k equipment loan for manufacturing machinery and I want to make sure I understand the proper collateral description format. The loan officer said something about needing specific language but didn't provide clear examples. Has anyone dealt with UCC 1-308 requirements recently? I'm worried about getting the filing rejected due to improper formatting. This is for filing in our state's SOS office and the equipment includes CNC machines, industrial printers, and related tooling. Any guidance on proper UCC 1-308 example language would be huge help.
36 comments


Sofia Martinez
UCC 1-308 typically refers to reservation of rights language, but in the context of UCC-1 filings, you're probably looking for proper collateral description examples. For equipment financing, your collateral description should be specific enough to identify the property but broad enough to cover variations. Something like 'All machinery, equipment, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor and located at [address], including but not limited to CNC machines, industrial printing equipment, and related tooling and accessories.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•This is exactly what I needed! Should I include serial numbers or model numbers in the UCC-1 description?
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
•Generally no - serial numbers make the description too narrow. You want to cast a wide net to cover equipment you might acquire later. Keep it broad but identifiable.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
Wait, are you sure about UCC 1-308? I thought that was something totally different. I've filed dozens of UCC-1s and never heard of 1-308 requirements. Are you maybe thinking of UCC Article 9 provisions? The collateral description rules are in UCC 9-108.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•You might be right - my lender might have misspoken. I just need to make sure my collateral description is bulletproof for this equipment loan.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Yeah, focus on UCC Article 9 requirements. Make sure your description reasonably identifies the collateral. Generic terms like 'equipment' are usually fine for commercial contexts.
0 coins
CyberSiren
Had a similar situation last month with equipment financing. After going back and forth with rejected filings, I discovered Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your UCC-1 draft and it instantly checks the collateral description format against standard requirements. Saved me from another rejection - the tool caught that my description was too vague in one section.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•That sounds helpful - did it specifically help with collateral description language?
0 coins
CyberSiren
•Yes, it flagged that I needed to be more specific about location and equipment categories. Really straightforward to use - just upload the PDF and get instant feedback.
0 coins
Miguel Alvarez
•How accurate is the checking? I've been burned by automated tools before that miss important details.
0 coins
Zainab Yusuf
For manufacturing equipment, I always use language like 'All machinery, equipment, tools, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired, including all attachments, accessories, replacements, and substitutions thereof.' This covers you if you upgrade or replace equipment during the loan term.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•That's comprehensive - should I also include specific location language?
0 coins
Zainab Yusuf
•Absolutely. Include 'located at [specific address]' and consider adding 'and any other locations where Debtor may maintain equipment' if you might move operations.
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
ugh these filings are so stressful!! I spent weeks getting mine right and still got rejected twice. The SOS office seems to reject everything on the first try. Make sure your debtor name matches EXACTLY with your business registration or they'll bounce it back.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Good point about the name matching. I'll double-check our registered business name before filing.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•I feel your pain! The name matching requirement is brutal. One extra comma or abbreviation and boom - rejection.
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
•exactly! and then you waste another week waiting for them to process the corrected version
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
I'm not familiar with UCC 1-308 either, but for equipment loans you definitely want to avoid being too specific in your collateral description. Courts have held that overly detailed descriptions can actually limit the security interest. Keep it broad but reasonable.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•That makes sense - I was worried about being too vague but sounds like too specific is also a problem.
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
•Right, it's a balance. You want someone reading the filing to understand what type of collateral is covered without limiting yourself unnecessarily.
0 coins
StardustSeeker
Quick question - are you filing this yourself or having your lender handle it? Most equipment lenders file the UCC-1 themselves since they want to control the process and timing.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Lender asked me to handle the filing prep, they'll review before submission. Want to make sure I don't mess up their security interest.
0 coins
StardustSeeker
•Smart approach. They probably have standard language they prefer - might be worth asking them for their template collateral description.
0 coins
Paolo Marino
•Yeah definitely get their input. Some lenders are really picky about specific wording in the collateral description.
0 coins
Amina Bah
For what it's worth, I recently used Certana.ai's verification tool when I was unsure about my UCC-1 filing. It cross-checked everything including collateral descriptions and debtor name formatting. Caught a potential issue with my equipment category description that could have caused problems later.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•How detailed is the feedback it provides on collateral descriptions?
0 coins
Amina Bah
•Pretty thorough - it flags vague language, suggests standard terms, and checks against common rejection reasons. Worth trying if you want extra confidence before filing.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
Just make sure whatever collateral description you use covers future acquisitions if that's important for your loan structure. Language like 'now owned or hereafter acquired' is standard for equipment financing.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Yes, we'll definitely be adding equipment over the loan term so that language is crucial.
0 coins
Oliver Becker
•Perfect. Also consider whether you need to include proceeds language - 'and all proceeds thereof' - depending on your lender's requirements.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
Update: Got connected with someone at Certana.ai after seeing it mentioned here. Their document checker tool is actually pretty slick - uploaded my draft UCC-1 and got instant feedback on the collateral description format. Turns out I was overthinking it, but good to have confirmation before filing. Thanks everyone for the guidance!
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
•Glad you got it sorted out! Equipment financing UCC-1s are pretty straightforward once you understand the format.
0 coins
CyberSiren
•Nice! The tool really takes the guesswork out of these filings. Hope your equipment loan goes smoothly.
0 coins
Javier Hernandez
•Congrats on getting it figured out. Nothing worse than filing anxiety when there's money on the line.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
Just to clarify the UCC 1-308 confusion - that's actually about "reservation of rights" language used in contracts, not UCC-1 filings. For your equipment loan, you want to focus on UCC Article 9 requirements. A solid collateral description would be: "All machinery, equipment, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired by Debtor, located at [business address], including without limitation CNC machines, industrial printing equipment, tooling, and all attachments, accessories, and replacements thereof." Keep it broad enough to cover future equipment but specific enough to identify the collateral type. Most state filing offices are pretty consistent with what they accept for equipment descriptions.
0 coins
Sofía Rodríguez
•Thanks for clearing up the UCC 1-308 confusion! That example collateral description looks really solid - exactly the kind of comprehensive language I was looking for. The "without limitation" clause is a nice touch to make sure we're covered for equipment variations. Really appreciate everyone's help sorting this out!
0 coins