Back to Washington Unemployment

Chris Elmeda

Boeing IAM workers excluded from WA Paid Family Medical Leave - alternatives?

Just found out the hard way that Boeing IAM (International Association of Machinists) employees don't qualify for Washington's Paid Family Medical Leave program! My husband works at the Everett facility and needed time off for a serious health condition, but was told Boeing IAM members only get their company short-term disability coverage instead of the state PFML. Looked at his most recent paystub and noticed there's no PFML deduction like I have on mine. Apparently this is something they're "supposed to add in the next contract" according to his shop steward. Really frustrating since the state benefit seems more generous in some cases. Anyone else in this situation? Has me thinking everyone at Boeing IAM should look into supplemental coverage like Aflac until this gets fixed. Any insights from other Boeing folks or union members in similar situations?

This is accurate. I work in HR benefits administration (not at Boeing) and many collective bargaining agreements have negotiated different leave packages. The WA PFML law specifically allows for collective bargaining units to opt out if they have "comparable benefits" through their negotiated contracts. Boeing IAM's contract includes their own disability coverage instead of participating in the state program. The state doesn't require the exact same benefits - just "comparable" coverage, which is unfortunately open to interpretation.

0 coins

Thanks for confirming! Do you know if other major unions in WA have done the same thing? Is Boeing's disability coverage actually comparable in your professional opinion? It seems less flexible to me.

0 coins

My brother works at Boeing Renton and ran into this exact issue last year when his wife had their baby. The short-term disability only covers the employee's own medical conditions, not family care like the state plan does. He ended up having to use vacation time to bond with his newborn. Definitely check out supplemental insurance options - we went with a different company than Aflac (Colonial Life I think?) that had better rates for Boeing employees specifically. Their agent actually comes to the Boeing facilities regularly.

0 coins

Wait I'm confused... I thought the IAM contract has parental leave? Isn't that different from short term disability? I'm starting at Boeing next month and now I'm worried about benefits.

0 coins

I can provide some clarification on this. Under RCW 50A.05.090, collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) can opt out of WA PFML if they have "comparable benefits." Boeing's IAM contract falls under this exception. Their STD plan covers the employee's medical conditions but not family care. Their separate parental leave benefit covers new children, but not caring for ill family members. If anyone needs to check if their employer participates in WA PFML, you can contact the Employment Security Department directly at 833-717-2273. Just be prepared to wait - their phone lines are constantly jammed. If you're trying to get through to ESD about this or any unemployment/PFML issue, I recommend using Claimyr (claimyr.com). They've got a system that holds your place in line and calls you when an agent is available. Saved me hours of holding when I had a PFML question. There's a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ?si=26TzE_zGms-DODN3

0 coins

THANK YOU for explaining this!!! I was on hold with ESD for 2.5 HOURS yesterday trying to ask about this exact thing since my coworker at Boeing is having the same problem. Will definitely check out that service because the hold times are RIDICULOUS.

0 coins

the Boeing STD plan is total garbage compard to state PFML. I took 12 weeks when my dad got cancer and got 90% of my pay from the state plan. my cousin @ boeing could only get 2 weeks of his own sick time. that's why i turned down a boeing offer last year, benefits matter!

0 coins

That's a huge difference! Was your cousin in the IAM union specifically or a different work group? I'm trying to understand if this is just an IAM issue or Boeing-wide.

0 coins

Important clarification on Boeing benefits: There are DIFFERENT benefit structures depending on which union represents you or if you're non-union. IAM (machinists) have different benefits than SPEEA (engineers/techs) or non-represented employees. All three groups have different leave policies. IAM-represented employees specifically don't participate in WA PFML, while some other Boeing employees do. It's confusing even for those of us who work there!

0 coins

This is correct. Each bargaining unit negotiates separately. The SPEEA contract (engineers/techs) actually does participate in WA PFML - IAM is the exception. This is why it's so important to understand your specific benefits package.

0 coins

my wife worked for boeing 15 years as a machinist and we learned the hard way about this too when i got hurt in 2023... they CLAIM the boeing short term disability is "comparable" but its NOT AT ALL... u cant use boeing STD to care for family like state PFML lets u do... total BS and i hope they fix it in the next contract !!!

0 coins

That's exactly what we're dealing with! Did your wife end up just using vacation time, or did she find another solution?

0 coins

For those in this situation, there's a little-known option worth investigating. If your spouse works somewhere that DOES participate in WA PFML, they might be eligible to take PFML to care for you even if you can't take it yourself through Boeing. The state program allows eligible employees to take leave to care for family members with serious health conditions regardless of where the family member works. This won't help for your own conditions but could be an option for family care situations.

0 coins

Wow never thought of that!! My wife works for the state so she definitely gets PFML. Good to know if I ever need care as a Boeing employee.

0 coins

I actually contacted our IAM union rep about this exact issue last month!!! They said it's definitely on the table for the next contract negotiations but wouldn't guarantee anything (of course). FYI the Machinist Union contract is up for renewal in 2025 so hopefully this gets addressed then. Until then we're all basically screwed compared to other WA workers.

0 coins

they ALWAYS say stuff is "on the table" and then nothing happens. been dealing with boeing/IAM for 9 years and its all talk. don't hold ur breath.

0 coins

Something everyone should know: If you're looking into supplemental coverage like Aflac, be aware that most policies have waiting periods before you can use them (often 30 days from enrollment) and they usually won't cover pre-existing conditions in the first 6-12 months. Don't wait until you need it to sign up - these policies are meant to be purchased well before you have a need for them.

0 coins

That's really good advice - thank you! I'm going to look into signing up right away rather than waiting. Better to have it and not need it than the other way around.

0 coins

As someone who just went through a similar situation with a family member at Boeing, I want to add that you should also check if your husband's specific health condition might qualify for FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act) instead. While FMLA is unpaid, it does provide job protection for up to 12 weeks, which Boeing has to honor regardless of their PFML opt-out status. It won't replace income like the state program would, but it's better than nothing and can be combined with any short-term disability benefits he might be eligible for through Boeing's plan. The paperwork is a hassle but worth it for the job security alone.

0 coins

As someone new to Washington and currently job hunting, this thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I had assumed that all Washington workers were covered by the state's PFML program - I had no idea that collective bargaining agreements could opt out with "comparable" benefits that clearly aren't actually comparable based on everyone's experiences here. This really highlights how important it is to dig deep into benefits packages during job interviews, especially asking specific questions about family leave policies. I'll definitely be asking potential employers whether they participate in state PFML or have opted out, and if they've opted out, exactly what their alternative coverage includes. The recommendation about Claimyr for getting through to ESD is also super helpful - I've been trying to call them about a different issue and those hold times are absolutely brutal. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences here, it's exactly the kind of practical information that you can't get from official HR materials or benefit summaries.

0 coins

You're absolutely right about digging deeper into benefits during interviews! I made the mistake of assuming all WA employers had the same PFML coverage when I was job hunting last year. Now I always ask specifically: "Does your company participate in Washington State's Paid Family and Medical Leave program, or do you have an alternative arrangement?" The HR reps' answers (or lack thereof) tell you a lot about how well they understand their own benefits packages. Also great tip about Claimyr - I wish I had known about that service months ago when I was trying to get answers from ESD. It's frustrating that we need a third-party service just to reach a state agency, but if it works, it works! Thanks for adding your perspective as someone new to the state - it's a good reminder that this stuff isn't intuitive even for people who think they understand WA's progressive benefits.

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm really grateful for all the detailed information everyone has shared here! I'm currently navigating a similar situation - my partner works for a different union (not Boeing, but also opted out of WA PFML) and we're trying to figure out our options before we potentially need family leave. Reading through everyone's experiences, it's clear that the "comparable benefits" language in the law is being interpreted very loosely. The fact that Boeing's STD only covers the employee's own medical conditions but not family care seems like a huge gap compared to state PFML, which explicitly covers both. I'm curious - has anyone tried filing a complaint with the state about whether these opt-out arrangements are truly "comparable"? It seems like there should be some oversight mechanism to ensure that CBAs that opt out are actually providing equivalent coverage. The stories here suggest they're not even close to equivalent in many practical situations. Also want to echo the thanks for the Claimyr recommendation - just bookmarked that for future reference since ESD's phone system seems to be a nightmare for everyone!

0 coins

Welcome to the discussion, Javier! Your question about filing complaints with the state is really interesting and something I hadn't considered. From what I understand, the Department of Labor & Industries oversees the PFML program implementation, so they might be the agency to contact about whether opt-out arrangements truly meet the "comparable benefits" standard. It does seem like there should be more scrutiny of these arrangements - especially when you look at the real-world impacts people are sharing here. The gap you mentioned between Boeing's STD (employee only) versus state PFML (employee + family care) is exactly the kind of thing that makes these arrangements seem not comparable at all. I wonder if enough complaints might prompt the state to review the criteria for what constitutes "comparable" coverage. Has anyone here actually tried reaching out to L&I about this issue? It might be worth exploring, especially with multiple unions potentially affected across the state. Thanks for bringing up this angle - sometimes it takes fresh eyes to see solutions the rest of us have overlooked!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, this discussion has been incredibly informative! I'm currently working for a different employer in Washington that does participate in PFML, but my partner is considering a position with Boeing IAM. Reading through everyone's experiences really highlights how significant these benefit gaps can be for families. What's particularly concerning is how the current system seems to create inequality among Washington workers based on their union representation. It feels like the "comparable benefits" standard needs much clearer criteria to ensure families aren't left with substantially less protection than what the state intended to provide all workers. I'm wondering if anyone has tried reaching out to state legislators about this issue? With multiple unions potentially affected and the 2025 Boeing contract negotiations coming up, it might be worth advocating for changes to the law itself - either strengthening the "comparable benefits" requirements or providing more oversight of these opt-out arrangements. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and practical advice about supplemental coverage, FMLA, and the Claimyr service. This is exactly the kind of real-world information that helps people navigate these complex benefit systems!

0 coins

Great point about reaching out to state legislators, Mei! I hadn't thought about advocating for changes to the law itself, but you're absolutely right that the current "comparable benefits" standard seems too vague and is clearly creating inequality among Washington workers. The fact that Boeing IAM members are essentially getting less family leave protection than other state employees really does undermine the intent of the PFML program. I wonder if contacting representatives who were involved in passing the original PFML legislation would be a good starting point? They might be interested to hear how the opt-out provisions are working in practice versus what was intended. With your partner potentially joining Boeing and you already having PFML coverage, you'd have a really compelling personal story about how this affects families across different employment situations. The timing does seem right with the 2025 contract negotiations approaching - legislative attention might actually help strengthen the union's position in pushing for true PFML participation rather than the current inadequate alternative. Thanks for bringing up this broader advocacy angle!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, this thread has been incredibly eye-opening! I'm currently working in Washington but considering a career change, and Boeing was actually on my list of potential employers. Reading through everyone's experiences has really highlighted how important it is to understand the fine print of benefits packages, especially around family leave. What strikes me most is how the Boeing IAM situation creates such a stark inequality compared to other Washington workers. The fact that a strong union somehow ended up with worse family leave coverage than what non-union employees get automatically through state PFML seems completely backwards from what you'd expect collective bargaining to achieve. The practical advice shared here has been invaluable - particularly the tips about supplemental insurance waiting periods, the possibility of spouse PFML coverage, and the Claimyr service for actually getting through to ESD. I had no idea about any of these workarounds that Boeing families have had to develop. I'm really hoping the 2025 contract negotiations address this gap. It sounds like there's growing awareness among IAM members about how inadequate the current arrangement is compared to state PFML. The legislative advocacy angle others have mentioned also seems worth pursuing - the "comparable benefits" standard clearly needs to be more specific about covering the same situations, not just similar dollar amounts. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed real-world experiences. This is exactly the kind of community knowledge that helps people make informed decisions about their careers and benefits!

0 coins

Welcome to the discussion, Sophia! Your observation about this being "backwards from what you'd expect collective bargaining to achieve" really hits the nail on the head. It's such a perfect example of how well-intentioned policies can have unintended consequences when the implementation details aren't carefully thought through. As someone also considering career changes in Washington, I've found this thread invaluable for understanding what questions to actually ask during the interview process. The gap between what benefits look like on paper versus how they work in real-life situations is huge, and Boeing's situation seems like a cautionary tale about assuming that "alternative arrangements" are automatically better just because they're negotiated by a union. The community knowledge shared here about workarounds and practical solutions really demonstrates how much Boeing IAM families have had to figure out on their own to navigate these benefit gaps. It shouldn't be this complicated for workers in one of the state's largest employers to access family leave coverage that's supposedly available to all Washington workers. Thanks for adding your perspective as someone evaluating Boeing as a potential employer - it's helpful to see how this looks to people considering joining that workforce!

0 coins

Washington Unemployment AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
43,813 users helped today