Will my survivor benefits be less than my husband's actual Social Security payment? Statement shows $600 difference
I'm trying to understand what my survivor benefits would be if my husband passes away. We've been married for 47 years, and I'm already past my Full Retirement Age. My monthly SS benefit is about $1,300, while my husband receives approximately $3,600 monthly. I understand I can't receive both and would need to choose the higher amount. What's confusing me is that when we looked at his Social Security Statement, it says the spousal survivor benefit would be around $3,000 - which is $600 LESS than what he's currently receiving! Is this an error on the statement, or do survivor benefits get reduced somehow? I thought surviving spouses were entitled to 100% of the deceased spouse's benefit if they're at FRA. Can someone please explain this discrepancy?
20 comments
Sofia Gutierrez
As a surviving spouse at FRA, you should be entitled to 100% of your husband's benefit amount. That $600 difference is definitely worth questioning! A few possibilities: 1. The statement might be showing an outdated projection that doesn't include recent COLAs or earnings 2. There might be some adjustment due to government pension offset (GPO) if you have a pension from non-covered employment 3. It could simply be an error on the statement I'd recommend calling SSA directly to get clarification on this discrepancy. They can look at both your records and give you the correct projection.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•My mom had something similar on my dad's statement. Turned out the number on the statement was calculated years ago and hadn't been updated with his raises and COLAs. Def call them.
0 coins
StarSurfer
The same thing was on my statement too! I think they use some weird calculation method that doesn't match real life. My wife was so confused until we talked to someone at our local office who explained it better.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•I've found SS statements to be pretty confusing overall. They seem to use projections based on different scenarios that don't always match current reality. And the explanations they include don't really clarify much!
0 coins
Miguel Castro
This is a common source of confusion. The survivor benefit amount shown on Social Security Statements is often based on calculations that don't reflect the actual benefit amount being paid. Here's what's likely happening: - The Statement typically shows what your survivor benefit would be if your husband passed away THIS YEAR - It may not include all recent earnings or COLA adjustments - If your husband took benefits early with a reduction, but you claim survivor benefits at your FRA, the reduction doesn't apply to you - Some statements calculate based on the Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) rather than the actual benefit being received You're correct that as a surviving spouse who has reached FRA, you should receive 100% of your husband's benefit amount if it's higher than your own. I'd suggest requesting an appointment with SSA to get a personalized calculation of what your survivor benefit would actually be.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Thank you for this detailed explanation! My husband didn't take his benefits early - he waited until 70 to maximize them. So would that mean I should definitely get his full $3,600 amount rather than the $3,000 shown on the statement? I'll try to set up an appointment to confirm.
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
I went through this EXACT situation last year when my husband passed. The SSA statement showed about $500 less than what my husband was actually receiving. When I applied for survivor benefits, I actually received the FULL amount he was getting (minus the month of death payment processing). Don't trust the statement numbers - they're often outdated projections. The actual survivor benefit should be what he's currently receiving.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•I'm so sorry for your loss, but thank you for sharing your experience. That's reassuring to hear that you received the full amount despite what the statement showed. Did you have to point out the discrepancy to them or did they automatically give you the correct amount?
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
•They automatically gave me the correct amount. But I did specifically ask during the survivor benefit interview if I would get his full benefit amount, and the claims specialist confirmed I would. So it might be good to explicitly ask when you apply.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
i had such a headache trying to get thru to ssa about my husbands bennefits!! kept calling for WEEKS and either got busy signals or was on hold for hours just to get disconnected!!! so frustrating!!!
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•Same!!! The phone system is THE WORST. I literally had to call 30+ times to get through last month for a simple question. And then they transferred me twice and I got disconnected 🤬
0 coins
Ava Martinez
I spent THREE HOURS on hold with Social Security last month trying to ask a question about my survivor benefits after my wife passed. Got disconnected twice! I finally found this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me through to an agent in under 20 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU It was such a relief to finally talk to someone who could answer my questions about the survivor benefit calculations. Much better than waiting on hold all day or trying to figure it out from the confusing statements.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•oh wow never heard of that before! gonna check it out, thanks for sharing
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Thank you for this tip! I'm definitely going to look into this service. The last time I called SSA, I was on hold for nearly 2 hours before giving up.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
One thing to check - when did your husband start receiving his benefits? If he's getting delayed retirement credits for claiming after FRA (especially if he waited until 70), sometimes the statement doesn't accurately reflect those increases. The statements are often created using formulas that might not capture individual circumstances perfectly. If he waited until 70 to claim, that would explain why his actual benefit is higher than what the statement shows for survivor benefits. When you actually apply for survivor benefits, you should receive the same amount he was receiving.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Yes, he did wait until 70 to maximize his benefit! That makes so much sense now. The statement probably doesn't account for those delayed retirement credits. I'll still confirm with SSA, but this explanation really helps put my mind at ease. Thank you!
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
my aunt went thru this. the statement was wrong and she got the full amount my uncle was getting when she became a widow. don't worry too much about what the paper says!!!
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Thank you for sharing your aunt's experience! That's very reassuring to hear. It seems like the consensus is that the statements aren't always accurate.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
As others have confirmed, if your husband waited until age 70 to claim, the statement is likely not reflecting his delayed retirement credits (DRCs). Each year he delayed past his FRA increased his benefit by 8%, up to a maximum of 32% if he waited from FRA to 70. When you claim survivor benefits, you'll receive the higher of: 1. Your own retirement benefit ($1,300) 2. The actual amount your husband was receiving at the time of his death ($3,600) This is why planning for survivor benefits is such an important part of married couples' Social Security strategy - having one spouse (typically the higher earner) delay benefits to age 70 not only maximizes their lifetime benefit but also potentially provides a higher survivor benefit for the remaining spouse.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•This makes perfect sense, and I'm so glad my husband decided to wait until 70 to claim. It sounds like that decision will benefit me if I outlive him. Thank you for breaking this down so clearly!
0 coins