Switching from my SS benefits to husband's at 62 - early filing reduction percentages?
I'm trying to plan our retirement and struggling to understand my options. I turn 62 next March and my husband won't start collecting his Social Security until he's 67 (about 3 years after me). Can I start collecting my own benefits at 62, then later switch to receiving benefits based on his record when he starts collecting? And exactly how much will my benefits be reduced for taking them early? My FRA is 67, and I've heard different reduction percentages thrown around (25%? 30%?). Would the same reduction apply if I switched to spousal benefits after initially claiming my own? I've tried calculating this myself but am getting confused with all the different rules. Any clarity would be greatly appreciated!
19 comments
AstroAce
Yes, you can start your own retirement benefits at 62, but the reduction is permanent - about 30% less than your full retirement age amount. When your husband files, you can switch to spousal benefits if they would be higher, but those would also be reduced because you started early. The spousal reduction is different - you'd get a maximum of 32.5% of your husband's PIA instead of the full 50% you'd get at your FRA. The SSA calculates this based on the number of months before your FRA that you file. Each of the first 36 months reduces benefits by 5/9 of 1% and additional months by 5/12 of 1%.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•Thank you! So even though I'd be switching to spousal benefits later, the reduction still applies because I initially filed early? Does that mean there's no advantage to switching at all unless his benefit amount is substantially higher than mine?
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
When i did this I got so confused!! I think what matters is when YOU file not when he files. My husband is older and I took mine at 63 and it was reduced by like 22% i think? Then when i switched to his later it was still reduced by that same amount. Cant remember exactly tho
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•This isn't quite right. The reduction for taking your own benefit early is different from the reduction for taking spousal benefits early. The spousal benefit reduction is based on YOUR age when YOU first claim ANY benefit. So if you claim at 62, your eventual spousal benefit will be reduced even if you don't switch to it until years later when your husband files.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
Let me clear this up with some specific numbers. At age 62, your own retirement benefit would be reduced by approximately 30% (it's actually 30.83% if your FRA is 67). For spousal benefits, the maximum you can receive is 50% of your husband's primary insurance amount (PIA), but that's only if you wait until your FRA to claim. Since you're claiming at 62, your spousal benefit would be reduced to about 32.5% of his PIA. The key thing to understand is that once you take ANY benefit early, the reduction is locked in. So even if you switch to spousal benefits years later when your husband files, you'll still have that reduction applied because you started benefits early. This is called "deemed filing" - when you file for one benefit, you're deemed to have filed for all benefits you're eligible for at that time. The only way to avoid this reduction would be to wait until your FRA to claim any benefits.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•This makes much more sense now. So there's really no strategic advantage to starting early and then switching unless his benefit is a lot higher than mine. If I'm understanding correctly, I'd get 69.17% of my full benefit at 62, and then later could switch to 32.5% of his PIA if that amount is higher. Is that right?
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
THE SSA MAKES THIS SO COMPLICATED ON PURPOSE!! I tried doing the same thing and ended up getting LESS than if I'd just stuck with my own benefit. The reduction isn't fair because we PAID INTO THE SYSTEM our whole lives!!! The govt just wants to keep our money as long as possible. Good luck getting anyone at SSA to explain it clearly - I spent 4 HOURS on hold last time I called them!!!
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•I agree the wait times are crazy. I tried calling SSA last month about a similar issue and gave up after being on hold for 2 hours.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
Try using Claimyr to get through to an SSA agent quickly - that's what I did when I needed to sort out this exact issue. It helped me skip the hold times completely, which was a lifesaver. I was able to actually talk to a claims specialist who walked me through all my options. You can check it out at claimyr.com or watch how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•Thanks for the suggestion! Did the agent you spoke with provide clear answers about the reduction percentages? I'm worried I might still be confused even after talking to someone.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Yes, they were really helpful. The agent I spoke with pulled up my work history and gave me exact dollar amounts for different filing ages, including what my spousal benefit would be. Made it much easier to compare my options.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
To answer your follow-up question - yes, that's exactly right. You'd get 69.17% of your PIA if claiming at 62, and could later switch to 32.5% of your husband's PIA if that amount is higher. One thing to consider: if your husband's PIA is more than twice yours, then even the reduced spousal benefit might still be higher than your own reduced benefit. Let's say your PIA is $1,500 and your husband's is $3,200: - Your reduced benefit at 62: $1,500 × 69.17% = $1,038 - Your reduced spousal benefit: $3,200 × 32.5% = $1,040 In this case, you'd get a tiny bump when switching. But if the difference between your PIAs isn't that large, sticking with your own benefit might be better.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•Thank you so much for breaking this down with actual numbers! This really helps me visualize the options. I think I need to find out our exact PIAs before making a decision.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
my mom did this and regretted it later. she would've gotten more if she'd just waited til FRA for her own benefit. just something to think about
0 coins
AstroAce
•This is a good point. While you can't predict how long you'll live, the break-even point for waiting vs. claiming early is typically around age 80. If you expect to live longer than that, waiting usually results in more lifetime benefits.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
I just remembered that there's some worksheet on the SSA website that helps u calculate this!!! Google "SSA reduction factors" and it might come up
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•You're probably thinking of the Early or Delayed Retirement Factors page on SSA.gov. It's a good resource, but doesn't fully address the complexity of switching between retirement and spousal benefits. The SSA's retirement estimator tool is more helpful for running different scenarios.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
One question nobody's addressed - have you checked if your husband's FRA benefit amount is actually higher than yours? If your earnings were similar throughout your careers, it might not make sense to switch at all. The best strategy depends on your specific earnings histories and the difference between your benefit amounts. Also, consider how early claiming affects survivor benefits. If your husband passes away, you would be eligible for survivor benefits equal to what he was receiving. If he delayed claiming until 70, that's a larger survivor benefit for you.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•That's a really good point about survivor benefits that I hadn't considered at all. His earnings have been higher than mine throughout our careers (I worked part-time for about 10 years while raising kids), so I'm pretty sure his benefit will be higher.
0 coins