Can I collect spousal Social Security after taking my own benefit at 62? Age requirements and reduction questions
I'm turning 62 this summer and planning to start my SS retirement benefits early. My husband is 64 this year but wants to wait longer to collect his benefits (probably until his FRA or even 70). I know I can't get spousal benefits until he files for his own, but I'm confused about the rest of the rules. Is there a certain age I have to be to collect spousal benefits once he does file? And by taking my own reduced benefit at 62, will that permanently lower what I could get from his record later? His benefit will be about twice what mine is, so I'm trying to figure out the best approach. Anyone dealt with this situation before?
18 comments
Nia Wilson
Your gonna get reduced benefits no matter what if you collect at 62! My sister did this and regretted it so much!!!
0 coins
Luca Russo
•Does that reduced amount apply to both my own benefit AND any spousal benefit I might get later? I need to work less for health reasons, so waiting isn't really an option for me.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
There are a few things to understand here: 1. Yes, you can eventually collect spousal benefits after your husband files, regardless of your age at that time. 2. By filing for your own benefits at 62, you'll take a permanent 30% reduction on your own benefit amount. 3. When your husband files, you'll be eligible for spousal benefits IF his primary insurance amount (PIA) would give you more than your own benefit. 4. The spousal benefit would be the difference between your PIA (not your reduced benefit) and 50% of his PIA, but that difference will also be reduced because you took benefits early. So yes, taking your benefit early will affect both your retirement benefit and any potential spousal benefit. It's called "deemed filing" - when you file for one benefit, you're deemed to have filed for all benefits you're eligible for.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•Wait I thought the rules changed again! I heard from my friend that you can file a restricted application if you were born before 1954? Is that not a thing anymore? Ugh the SSA makes this SO CONFUSING on purpose I swear.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•You're right that restricted applications were available for people born before January 2, 1954. But the original poster mentioned she's turning 62 this year (2025), which means she was born in 1963 and wouldn't qualify for that option. The deemed filing rule applies to her situation.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
in my experience whatever u do DONT call the SS office right now they are impossible to reach i tried for 3 weeks straight and coudlnt get anyone. waited on hold for hours and it just disconnects me.
0 coins
AstroAce
•I had the EXACT same experience last month trying to sort out my husband's benefits. Three disconnections after 2+ hour holds each time! Finally I used this service called Claimyr that got me through to an agent in under 20 minutes. Totally worth checking out their video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - their website is claimyr.com. Saved me days of frustration.
0 coins
Ethan Clark
•for real? never heard of that but i might try anything at this point!!
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
The most important thing to understand is that by taking your benefits at 62, you're locking in a permanent reduction to ANY benefit you'll ever receive from Social Security. I was in a similar situation. My husband is 4 years older than me, and I started my benefits at 62. When he filed at his Full Retirement Age, I was able to switch to spousal benefits because they were higher than my own reduced benefit. But I didn't get the full 50% of his benefit because I had filed early. If maximizing lifetime benefits is your goal, you might want to reconsider taking benefits at 62, especially if your husband's benefit is substantially higher. Each year you wait between 62 and your FRA increases your benefit by about 7-8%. Have you considered other options for the next few years if you need to work less?
0 coins
Luca Russo
•Thanks for sharing your experience. I do need the income, so waiting isn't really practical for me. I have some health issues that make working full-time difficult. Do you remember approximately what percentage of his benefit you ended up getting since you filed early?
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•I ended up getting about 35% of his benefit instead of the full 50%. But everyone's calculation is different based on your exact age when you file and the difference between your benefit amounts. I'd recommend creating an account on my.ssa.gov if you haven't already - they have benefit calculators that can show you the different scenarios.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
my aunt took her own benefit at 62 and then when my uncle filed at 66 she got a little bit more added to hers. not as much as she hoped but something. the trick is that your spousal benefit is reduced if you take it before YOUR full retirement age. but sounds like in your case you will have already hit your FRA by the time your husband files if hes going to wait til 70, so that part shouldn't be an issue for you i think.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•That's not quite accurate. The reduction for taking spousal benefits early is based on when you first file for ANY benefit. So if she files for her own benefit at 62, and later switches to spousal benefits when her husband files, her spousal benefit will still be reduced as if she had taken spousal benefits at 62 - even if she's reached her FRA by then. This is how deemed filing works under the current rules.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
This whole system is RIDICULOUS!!! I spent HOURS trying to figure this out when I was in your situation. The SSA website is useless and the phone lines are a joke. I ended up talking to THREE different agents and got THREE different answers!! One told me I could get 50% of my husband's, another said I'd get less because I filed early, and a third said I might not get any spousal benefit at all because my own was too high. I STILL don't know if I'm getting the right amount!!! 😡😡😡
0 coins
Luca Russo
•That's exactly what I'm afraid of happening. Did you ever find out which answer was correct?
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•Well I *think* the middle one was right - I did get some additional amount when my husband filed, but it was way less than 50% of his benefit. But honestly I'm still not sure they calculated it correctly. The whole thing is a black box!
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
To summarize the key points that might help you decide: 1. Filing at 62 means a permanent 30% reduction to your retirement benefit 2. Later, when your husband files, you'll be eligible for spousal benefits equal to the greater of: - Your own reduced benefit, OR - A reduced spousal benefit 3. The reduced spousal benefit would be calculated as: [50% of your husband's PIA - 100% of your PIA] plus a reduction factor based on your age when you first filed (62) 4. Since your husband's benefit is about twice yours, you'll likely get some additional amount when he files, but it won't be the full difference between your benefit and 50% of his If possible, I'd recommend setting up an appointment with an SSA claims specialist who can run the exact numbers for your situation.
0 coins
Luca Russo
•Thank you for explaining it so clearly. I think I understand the tradeoffs now. Given my health situation, I still think taking benefits at 62 makes sense for me, even with the reduction. I'll try to get an appointment with SSA to confirm the numbers.
0 coins