Social Security timing advice for 62-year-old with young kids and much younger spouse
I met with a former colleague (62) yesterday who's trying to decide when to claim SS benefits. His situation seems really unique and now I'm wondering what would actually be best for him. He retired last year but his wife is only 45 and still working in the same profession (likely to earn more than he did eventually). They have two kids ages 8 and 15. I know the standard advice is usually to wait until FRA or even 70 for higher benefits, but with young kids involved, I'm confused about the best strategy. If he passes away, I believe his kids would get survivor benefits until they're 18, right? But would waiting to claim increase those potential survivor benefits? And I don't think his wife would qualify for spousal benefits for a long time due to the age gap. Anyone have experience with this kind of age difference and dependent children situation? What claiming age makes the most sense?
19 comments


Aisha Ali
This is actually a situation where waiting to claim until at least his Full Retirement Age (66+) or even 70 makes a LOT of sense. Here's why: 1. Survivor benefits for his children AND his widow would be based on his benefit amount. If he claims at 62, that's a permanent 30% reduction that would affect any survivor benefits his family might receive. 2. His children would indeed receive survivor benefits until age 18 (or 19 if still in high school). 3. His wife would be eligible for survivor benefits as early as age 60 (or 50 if disabled). There's also the option of mother's/father's benefits if she's caring for their child under 16. 4. The family maximum benefit (FMax) would apply, but with multiple potential beneficiaries, maximizing his base benefit amount is crucial. Given the 17-year age gap and young children, delaying benefits provides important insurance protection for his family.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•Thank you for the detailed explanation. I hadn't considered that claiming early would permanently reduce potential survivor benefits for everyone! That makes waiting seem much more important. Do you know if there's any calculator that can show the difference in potential survivor benefits based on different claiming ages? I'd like to share some concrete numbers with him.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
my dad was in kind of similar situation, he took his at 62 and regretted it when he found out how much less we got when he passed. tell your friend to WAIT
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•I'm sorry about your dad. That's exactly the kind of real-world experience I was hoping to hear about. I'll definitely pass that along to my friend. Did you find out how much more your family would have received if he had waited?
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
WAIT WAIT WAIT!!! The kids thing changes EVERYTHING. Most people don't realize this, but the kids get benefits while he's ALIVE too! Not just survivor benefits if he dies. If he claims retirement benefits with dependent children under 18, they can each get up to 50% of his PIA (primary insurance amount). There's a family maximum that applies, but with the young kids, he might want to claim SOONER rather than later so the kids get those dependent benefits longer. The 8 year old could get benefits for 10 years if he files now! People always talk about waiting but sometimes claiming earlier makes sense with young kids involved. His wife's earnings don't matter for the KIDS' benefits!
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•This is partially correct but needs clarification. Yes, dependent benefits are available for children while the worker is alive AND collecting benefits. However, the 30% reduction for claiming at 62 also reduces the family maximum benefit. The trade-off is complex, but generally, if longevity is expected, waiting still provides better lifetime value when considering ALL potential benefits to ALL family members over time. The worker should request a calculation of dependent benefits at different claiming ages from SSA to make an informed decision.
0 coins
StarSurfer
I actually went through a similar situation with my husband who was older with our young son. We visited our local Social Security office and asked them to calculate the total family benefits under different scenarios - him filing at 62, at FRA, and at 70. Something that surprised us was the family maximum benefit (FMax) which caps the total amount your family can receive. So even though each dependent can get up to 50% of the worker's benefit, there's a ceiling on the combined total. The FMax increases if the worker waits to file. Also, important to consider survivor benefits for the spouse may be more significant in the long run than dependent benefits for kids (which end at 18). His wife would potentially receive survivor benefits for decades. I'd recommend having your friend call SSA to discuss the specific numbers for his situation.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
•Did you ever get through to anyone? I've been trying to call SSA for WEEKS about my disability and can never talk to anyone!!!
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
If your friend is having trouble getting through to SSA to discuss these options (which is super common), I found a service called Claimyr that can help. It basically helps you skip the phone wait times at SSA. Saved me hours of frustration when I needed to discuss my widow benefits options. You can check it out at claimyr.com - they have a video demo at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU showing how it works. Really helpful for complicated situations like your friend's where you need to talk to an actual person instead of trying to figure it out online.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•Thanks for suggesting this! He mentioned he's been trying to get specific numbers from SSA but keeps getting disconnected. I'll pass this along - would be great if he could actually talk to someone about his specific situation.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
Idk about all the complicated math everyone's talking about but my uncle was in this situation and his financial advisor told him to wait til 70 cause of the kids
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
•Financial advisors usually say wait til 70 no matter what the situation is. I've heard so many stories of people waiting and then they die at 71 and barely got any benefits! Sometimes you need to just take the money when you can get it.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•This is a common concern, but statistically incorrect. Even if someone passes away earlier than expected, their survivors often collect benefits for many years based on that higher amount. The break-even analysis needs to include ALL potential beneficiaries, not just the worker.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
one thing to think about... has your friend worked at least 35 years? if not his benefit calcuation will have zeros averaged in and might be lower than he thinks
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•That's a good point! I believe he's worked for about 40 years in his profession, so he should have a full work record. But I'll mention this to make sure he's considering that in his calculations.
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
Tell your friend he should look at his life expectancy. Everyone here is assuming he'll live a long time but what if he doesn't? My dad waited to claim and then only got benefits for 4 years before he passed. If he claims at 62, that's 8 years of benefits he'd get before 70. That's a lot of money! And another thing - what about spousal benefits for his wife? His wife has to be 62 to claim those I think so that's a long way off. But once she reaches that age it's based on his PIA so if he takes early it won't affect her spousal amount I'm pretty sure.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•There's a correction needed here: spousal benefits ARE affected if he claims early. While her spousal benefit would be based on his PIA (Primary Insurance Amount), if she claims spousal benefits early (before her FRA), her amount would be reduced. Additionally, survivor benefits for both children and the spouse would be permanently reduced if he claims early. Given the 17-year age difference and children involved, this creates a very long potential benefit period where the higher amount would be valuable.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
Thank you all for the incredible advice! I spoke with my friend today and shared your insights. He was surprised to learn about how his claiming age would affect potential survivor benefits for both his kids AND his wife. He's going to try using the Claimyr service to actually speak with someone at SSA about his specific numbers. He's now leaning toward waiting until at least his FRA, possibly longer. The family maximum benefit concept was new to him too. It sounds like the best approach is to get actual calculations from SSA for different claiming scenarios to see the real impact on total family benefits. Really appreciate all your help with this unusual situation!
0 coins
StarSurfer
•Glad we could help! It's definitely worth getting those specific calculations. When we did that, seeing the actual dollar amounts made the decision much clearer. The difference between filing at 62 vs waiting can be substantial when multiplied across multiple beneficiaries over many years.
0 coins