Social Security Fairness Act - will my wife born in 1957 automatically get higher spousal benefits?
I'm trying to understand if the Social Security Fairness Act would help my wife's benefits situation. She was born in 1957 and started collecting her own SS retirement benefits when I did back in 2022. Her monthly payment is only $1,250 while I receive $2,850. I've been doing some research and calculated she'd get around $1,425 if she could switch to spousal benefits (50% of mine). I read somewhere that people born after 1954 would automatically be switched to whichever benefit is higher (personal or spousal), but I can't find any official confirmation from SSA about this. We've called the SSA three times but keep getting different answers from different representatives. Does anyone know definitively if the Fairness Act includes automatic switching to the higher benefit for those born after 1954? Or would my wife need to submit some kind of application to change from her own benefit to the spousal benefit? I'd really appreciate any insights from someone who understands these rules.
16 comments


Santiago Diaz
There seems to be some confusion here. The Social Security Fairness Act (as currently proposed) mainly addresses the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO) - it doesn't specifically relate to choosing between personal and spousal benefits. What you're referring to is likely the changes that came with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which eliminated certain filing strategies. For people born in 1954 or later, SSA automatically gives you the higher of either your own benefit or your spousal benefit - you can't choose one or the other strategically anymore. Since your wife was born in 1957, she falls under these rules. She should automatically receive whichever is higher. If her spousal benefit would be higher than her current payment, I'd suggest scheduling an appointment with SSA to review her specific case, as they should have already given her the higher amount.
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•Thank you for clarifying that! I was definitely mixing up the Fairness Act with the 2015 budget changes. That makes much more sense now. But I'm still confused why she isn't automatically getting the higher amount. When we called, one representative said she needed to file a specific application for spousal benefits, another said it happens automatically, and the third said she wasn't eligible for any increase. It's so frustrating getting different answers every time.
0 coins
Millie Long
my wife had similar situation (born 1956) and we had to SPECIFICALLY ASK for them to check if spousal was higher!!!!! they dont do it automatic like they claim... we got backpay for 6 months when they finally fixed it. CALL THEM AGAIN and specifically ask for a benefit recalculation comparing her retirement to spousal! dont take no for answer
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•Thanks for sharing your experience - that's really helpful to know! I was starting to think it was just us having this problem. Did they give you trouble when you called to have it recalculated? And did they only backpay for 6 months even if she was eligible for longer?
0 coins
KaiEsmeralda
I've been dealing with this exact issue recently. What I've learned is that while the SSA is supposed to automatically pay the higher benefit, their systems don't always trigger this comparison correctly, especially if you started receiving your own benefits first and then became eligible for spousal later. What worked for me was calling and specifically requesting a "spousal benefit computation" to compare the two amounts. The key is getting someone knowledgeable on the phone - which can be nearly impossible with SSA wait times. I wasted weeks trying to get through on the regular line before I found this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com). They have a system that holds your place in the SSA phone queue and calls you when an agent is available. Saved me hours of hold time. They have a video that shows how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU After finally getting through, I had to be very specific about requesting the computation. Within two weeks, my wife started receiving the higher amount plus some backpay.
0 coins
Debra Bai
•does that claimyr thing really work? i've been trying to get thru to ssa for 3 days now
0 coins
KaiEsmeralda
•Yes, it definitely worked for me. I was skeptical at first but I got a call back with an SSA agent in about 45 minutes after trying for days on my own. Just be ready with all your questions when they connect you.
0 coins
Gabriel Freeman
This whole system is RIDICULOUS! My husband and I went through something similar (I'm born in 1958) and we had to visit our local office THREE TIMES before someone actually knew what they were talking about!!! The first two people told us completely contradictory information. One said I wasn't eligible for spousal at all because I had my own work record (WRONG), another said I had to wait until FRA (ALSO WRONG). Finally got someone who actually knew the rules and yes, they're SUPPOSED to automatically give you the higher amount, but their computer system is from the STONE AGE and doesn't always trigger the comparison. We had to fill out a specific form requesting the comparison (don't remember the number). Good luck dealing with their incompetence!!!
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•This is so frustrating to hear but also validates what we've been experiencing. Do you remember approximately how long it took them to process everything once you submitted that form? We're trying to plan financially for the next few months.
0 coins
Laura Lopez
I think I can help clarify this for you. There are a few important points here: 1. For anyone born after January 1, 1954, the deemed filing rules apply, meaning when you file for either retirement or spousal benefits, you're deemed to have filed for both, and SSA should give you whichever is higher. 2. However, there's an important technical detail: if your wife started receiving her retirement benefits before you started yours, then the spousal benefit comparison isn't automatically triggered in all cases. 3. The specific procedure is that you need to call SSA and request what's called a "spousal benefit computation" or "auxiliary benefit computation" - use those specific terms. 4. If it turns out her spousal benefit is higher, they should adjust it going forward AND provide backpay, though this is typically limited to 6 months of retroactive benefits unless there was a clear SSA error. I'd recommend getting this resolved soon, as any retroactive adjustment will be limited the longer you wait.
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•Thank you for this detailed explanation! This makes perfect sense now. My wife did start receiving her benefits slightly before I filed for mine, so that explains why the spousal comparison wasn't automatically triggered. I'll definitely call them and use those specific terms you suggested.
0 coins
Victoria Brown
my sister had same problem took 3 months to fix but she got extra $210 per month after they fixed it plus backpay
0 coins
Debra Bai
•thats a big difference! is that normal? my husband gets way more than me too so maybe i should check on this
0 coins
Riya Sharma
Thank you all for your helpful responses! I finally called SSA again today using the specific terms "spousal benefit computation" as suggested, and got someone who seemed to understand the situation. She confirmed that since my wife was born in 1957, she falls under the deemed filing rules, but because she started receiving her own benefits before I filed, the system didn't automatically compare the benefits. The representative has initiated a review of her case, and preliminary calculations show she should be eligible for about $175 more per month, plus some retroactive payments. They said it will take about 30-45 days to process the adjustment. For anyone else in a similar situation - be persistent and use the specific terminology "spousal benefit computation" when you call!
0 coins
Laura Lopez
•Great news! I'm glad you were able to get this resolved. The $175 monthly increase will make a significant difference over time. It's unfortunate that these comparisons don't happen automatically as they should, but your persistence paid off. Thanks for updating us on the outcome!
0 coins
Aisha Mohammed
Congratulations on getting this resolved! This is exactly why I love this community - everyone sharing their experiences helps others navigate these complex SSA issues. Your story perfectly illustrates how the system is supposed to work versus how it actually works in practice. It's really concerning that SSA representatives give such inconsistent information on these basic eligibility questions. The fact that you had to call multiple times and use specific terminology just to get a proper review shows there are serious training gaps in their customer service. For anyone else reading this thread who might be in a similar situation, I'd also recommend documenting everything - dates you called, names of representatives if they give them, and exactly what you were told. This can be helpful if you need to escalate later or if there are any disputes about timing for retroactive payments. The $175 monthly increase might seem modest, but that's over $2,000 per year - definitely worth the hassle of dealing with SSA's bureaucracy!
0 coins