Should my wife claim Social Security at 62 while I'm still working? Worried about reduction from my salary
Just trying to figure out the best strategy for my wife and me. I'm turning 66 in July (currently 65) and plan to keep working for about another year. My wife is 62, turning 63 in November, and hasn't been employed for the past couple of years. I'm not planning to file for my own benefits until I stop working, but we're debating whether my wife should start collecting now or wait until I retire too. Two things I'm confused about: 1. If my wife starts collecting her Social Security now, will her payments be reduced because of my income? I'm making around $87,000 annually. 2. We've calculated that the difference in her monthly benefit amount (claiming now vs. waiting a year) won't significantly impact our finances. Given this, is there any advantage to her waiting? Should she just start collecting now?
18 comments
NeonNebula
Your wife's benefit won't be reduced due to YOUR earnings - that's not how it works. However, if she starts collecting at 62, she'll permanently reduce her own retirement benefit by about 30% from what she'd get at her Full Retirement Age (66 and 10 months for her birth year). The more important question is whether she should take her own reduced benefit now OR wait until you file and take a spousal benefit (up to 50% of your PIA). It depends on whether her own benefit is higher or lower than half of yours.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Thanks for the clarification! That's helpful. So my income won't affect her benefit, but she'll take a permanent reduction for claiming early. Her work history is pretty limited, so her own benefit is definitely lower than half of mine. Should she still claim now or wait until I start collecting?
0 coins
Isabella Costa
my wife started colecting at 62 while i was still working and it worked fine for us. but remember she gets locked into that lower amount FOREVER so make sure thats ok with u guys
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•Actually that's not necessarily true... if her own benefit is less than half of her husband's, she'll get bumped up to the higher spousal amount (or a reduced spousal amount if she claims before FRA) when he files. So she's not necessarily stuck with that reduced amount forever.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
You've got a strategic decision to make, and the right choice depends entirely on the numbers. Here's what you need to know: 1. If your wife claims now at 62, she'll get a permanently reduced benefit (about 30% less than her full amount). 2. When you eventually file for your benefits, she'll be eligible for a spousal benefit (up to 50% of your Primary Insurance Amount) 3. The key calculation: If her own reduced benefit is LESS than what she'd get as a spouse, then when you file, the SSA will give her a combination of benefits equaling the higher spousal amount. Without knowing your specific benefit amounts, I'd recommend getting a break-even analysis done. For most couples where one spouse has a much stronger earnings record, it often makes sense for the lower-earning spouse to wait until the higher earner files.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Does his wife actually need to wait though? I thought she could claim her own reduced benefit now, then when he files she automatically gets the higher amount (either her reduced benefit or the spousal benefit, whichever is more). Am I understanding this wrong?
0 coins
Freya Christensen
Here's a key point that hasn't been addressed: If your wife files for her own benefits now AND she'll eventually qualify for a higher spousal benefit, she'll get what's called a "deemed filing." This means she'll get her own reduced benefit PLUS a reduced excess spousal benefit when you file. The total will likely be LESS than if she had waited until her FRA to claim spousal benefits. So if her own benefit is much smaller than what she'd get as your spouse, there could be a significant financial advantage to waiting.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
•Most people don't understand this deemed filing thing!! My sister got caught by this and now she's getting less than she expected. The SSA people never explained it clearly when she filed early.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
Having dealt with a similar situation, I can tell you reaching the SSA to get personalized advice on this is essential but incredibly frustrating. I spent weeks trying to get through on their 800 number without success. Eventually I found Claimyr (claimyr.com) and they got me connected to an agent in about 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with ran calculations specific to our situation that showed my wife should wait to claim spousal benefits rather than taking her own reduced benefit early. The numbers made our decision clear.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•I've been trying to get through to SSA for two weeks with no luck! Thanks for the tip - I'll check out that service. We really need to talk to someone who can look at our specific numbers.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Ok but nobody's talking about the EARNINGS TEST!!! If your wife is under FRA (which she is at 62) and earns over the annual limit ($21,240 in 2025), then $1 in benefits is withheld for every $2 she earns above the limit. But you said she's not working, so this wouldn't apply to her - just want to make sure you understand this doesn't apply to YOUR earnings affecting HER benefits.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•Good point about the earnings test! But yeah, since she's not working it doesn't matter in this case. And importantly, even if benefits are withheld due to the earnings test, they get recalculated and increased at FRA to account for the months benefits were withheld.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
Thanks everyone for the helpful information! I think I understand better now. Since my wife's own benefit would be much less than her potential spousal benefit (based on my earnings history), it might make more sense for her to wait until I file for my benefits. But I'll definitely get some specific calculations done through the SSA to confirm the best approach for our situation. This is more complicated than I thought!
0 coins
Freya Christensen
•That's a sound approach. One other consideration: when you claim your retirement benefit, your wife will also be eligible for a spousal benefit. If you claim at your FRA or later (which sounds like your plan), she could immediately claim a spousal benefit. But if her own benefit is very low, and you're only working one more year, it might not be worth losing a year of payments just to get slightly higher spousal benefits. Definitely get those SSA calculations before deciding.
0 coins
Chloe Davis
WAIT!!! Something nobody mentioned - if she waits till her FRA she can choose to ONLY file for spousal benefits and let her OWN benefit continue to grow until 70!!! That's what my financial advisor told me is the best strategy!!!!!
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That strategy (restricted application for spousal benefits only) is no longer available for people born after January 1, 1954. Based on the ages provided, the original poster's wife was born in 1961 or 1962, so she isn't eligible for this option. When she files, she'll be deemed to have filed for all benefits she's eligible for at that time.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
something nobody asked is what ur cashflow is like right now. if u guys need the money now then maybe its worth taking the hit. my wife and i did cause we needed to fix our roof. sometimes the math doesnt matter as much as what u need right now ya know?
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•That's a good point. We're doing okay financially right now, which is why I'm trying to optimize our long-term benefits. But you're right that immediate needs sometimes outweigh the perfect mathematical strategy!
0 coins