< Back to Social Security Administration

Can my wife claim Social Security at FRA while I'm working with 7-year age gap? Tax implications?

My wife just reached her full retirement age (67) last month, but she's holding off on filing for Social Security because I'm still working full-time. There's a 7-year age gap between us (I'm 60), and I won't reach my FRA for quite a while. Our financial advisor mentioned something about her potentially being able to claim now even though I'm working, but I'm confused about whether this makes sense tax-wise. If she does start collecting her retirement benefits now, what percentage would be taxable? We file jointly and our combined income is around $110,000 (mostly from my salary). Would her benefits push us into a higher tax bracket? I'm trying to figure out if there's any advantage to her claiming now versus waiting until I retire in about 5 years.

NebulaNinja

•

Yes, your wife can absolutely claim her retirement benefits at her full retirement age regardless of whether you're still working. Her claiming decision is completely independent of your employment status. The taxation question depends on your combined income. For married couples filing jointly, if your combined income (adjusted gross income + nontaxable interest + half of Social Security benefits) is between $32,000 and $44,000, up to 50% of benefits are taxable. Above $44,000, up to 85% of benefits may be taxable. With your income at $110,000 plus her potential benefits, you'd likely have 85% of her benefits subject to taxation.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

Thank you for explaining! So there's no restriction on her claiming, but the taxation might be significant. Is there any advantage to her claiming now versus waiting? Would her benefit amount increase if she delays past her FRA?

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Just FYI your wife can get delayed retirement credits if she waits past FRA to file. That's 8% per year increase up until age 70. So if she waits 3 more years she could get 24% more!! Something to think about... my sister waited til 70 and gets way more than her friends who took SS early. But everyone's situation is diffrent.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

yeah but waiting isnt always best. u gotta live long enuff to make up for all those payments u miss by waiting. break even is usually like 10-12 years after u start collecting. if u dont think ull live into ur 80s might as well take it earlier

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

There are a few important considerations beyond just the tax implications: 1) Your wife can earn Delayed Retirement Credits (DRCs) of 8% per year for each year she delays beyond her FRA up to age 70. This would permanently increase her monthly benefit. 2) With your age gap, if your own benefit will be higher than hers, there's a survivor benefit consideration. If you predecease her, she would receive your benefit amount as a survivor if it's higher than her own. So maximizing your benefit through delay might be more important than maximizing hers. 3) On taxation: Yes, with your combined income, about 85% of her benefits would be subject to your marginal tax rate. However, the actual tax impact depends on your specific tax bracket. 4) One strategy worth considering: If she files now, she gets benefits for 7 years before you reach your FRA, which provides income now rather than waiting for a larger amount later. The optimal choice really depends on your specific financial situation, health/longevity expectations, and retirement plans.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

This is extremely helpful, thank you! You've given me a lot to think about with the survivor benefit angle - I hadn't considered that my benefit might be more important to maximize if I pass away first.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

MY WIFE AND ME HAD SIMILAR SITUATION!! She was 5 yrs older than me and took SS at her FRA. Yes they taxed us on 85% of her benefits because of our income. But we needed the $$$ for medical bills so it made sense for us. No regrets even with the taxes.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

This is why I hate the SS tax rules! Working-class people end up with 85% of benefits taxed while millionaires with investment income use loopholes. My parents got hit with this too. The whole system needs an overhaul.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Everyone's talking about taxes but missing an important point - if your wife worked less years than you or earned less, she might be entitled to spousal benefits based on YOUR record once you file for benefits. Those could potentially be higher than her own retirement benefit. She might want to take her own benefit now, then switch to a spousal benefit (if higher) when you file. But I'm not 100% sure if that's still allowed with the new rules.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Important clarification: Under current rules, if your wife was born before January 2, 1954, she could potentially use a restricted application to switch between benefit types. However, for those born after that date (which is likely the case), the SSA automatically provides whichever is higher - her own benefit or the spousal benefit - when both are available. She can't switch back and forth anymore. The deemed filing rules now apply to everyone.

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

i tried calling SS 6 times to ask almost the same question for my situation but could never get thru!! so frustrating. they put u on hold for hours then hang up. does anyone know a better way to actually talk to a real person there?

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

I had the same issue but found this service called Claimyr that got me through to a real SSA agent in under 20 minutes. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU - it basically navigates the phone system for you and calls when an agent is available. I used it when I was dealing with benefit calculation issues last month. Saved me hours of frustration with the SSA phone system. Their website is claimyr.com if you want to check it out.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

One thing nobodys mentioned - if your wife works while collecting SS and she's at FRA, she won't have any benefit reduction no matter how much she earns. Only people under FRA have the earnings limitation where SSA withholds benefits. Something to consider if she wants to work part time?

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

That's a really good point! She's been considering some part-time consulting work, so it's good to know that wouldn't reduce her benefits since she's at FRA.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

The tax situation depends on your state too! Some states like NM, UT, VT tax Social Security benefits while others like FL, TX, WA have no state income tax at all. Where do you live? That could make a big difference in your calculations.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

We're in Illinois, which fortunately doesn't tax Social Security benefits at the state level. So we'd only be dealing with the federal taxation.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Since no one has mentioned it yet - you might want to run some actual numbers on the break-even analysis. If your wife claims at 67 versus waiting until 70, she'll need to live until approximately age 82-83 to break even (where the total benefits received by delaying equal what she would have received by filing at 67). Any years beyond that break-even point would favor delaying. Given that a woman who reaches 67 has an average life expectancy into her mid-80s, statistically delaying often makes sense, even accounting for the taxation of benefits.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

THATS THE RIGHT WAY TO LOOK AT IT!! Too many people just see the bigger check but dont do the math. My buddy waited til 70 then died at 72...bad deal. No one knows how long they got left.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,609 users helped today