Should I take Social Security at 64 with WEP penalty or wait until FRA? Spouse benefits not an option
I'm trying to decide whether to start my Social Security retirement benefits now at 64 or wait until my full retirement age (67). My situation is complicated because I'm affected by the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) due to my 22 years working as a teacher with a pension in Texas. I've also worked enough in Social Security covered jobs to qualify for benefits, but they'll be reduced by WEP. I've been told I won't be eligible for spousal benefits from my husband's record at all because of my pension. He's 66 and already taking his benefits (about $2,450/month). Our financial advisor says I should wait, but I'm tempted to just take the smaller amount now. My estimated benefit at 64 would be around $980/month after WEP reduction, and at 67 it would be about $1,250/month. Is that 3-year difference really worth waiting for? What factors should I consider? My health is good but my mother died young, so longevity is uncertain in my family. Any advice from others who've dealt with WEP and this decision?
18 comments
Elijah O'Reilly
The WEP situation definitely complicates things! I've been through this exact scenario, and here's what you need to consider: 1. Break-even point: With those benefit amounts, it would take approximately 11-12 years from age 67 to make up the difference between taking it early vs waiting. So if you live past 78-79, waiting would be better financially. 2. Life expectancy: Despite your mother's history, women on average live into their 80s. If you're in good health now, statistics favor waiting. 3. Current income needs: If you need the money now to maintain your lifestyle, that's a valid reason to claim early. 4. Other retirement resources: Do you have other savings that could allow you to delay? The GPO (Government Pension Offset) is what prevents you from collecting spousal benefits, which is separate from WEP that reduces your own benefit. Unfortunately, with a teacher's pension, you get hit with both. In my situation, I waited until FRA despite WEP, and I'm glad I did. The permanently higher monthly amount gives me peace of mind.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•Thank you for breaking this down so clearly. I hadn't thought about the break-even point - 11-12 years is longer than I expected. We do have some savings and my pension, so I'm not desperate for the SS income right now. You're right about the GPO being separate from WEP - my husband keeps saying I should be able to get something from his record, but everything I've read confirms I can't due to my pension. Can I ask how much your benefit increased by waiting? Did you go all the way to 70 or just to your FRA?
0 coins
Amara Torres
take it now!!! i waited and regret it. you never know what tomorrow brings and the government keeps changing the rules anyway. my sister waited til 67 and only got to collect for 2 years before she passed. all that money she couldve had earlier just gone. bird in hand!!
0 coins
Olivia Van-Cleve
•I'm sorry about your sister, that's really tough. But everyone's situation is different. My financial planner showed me the math, and waiting made sense for my situation, even with WEP reducing my benefit. It really depends on your health, family history, and overall financial picture. There's no one-size-fits-all answer to this question.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
I dealt with both WEP and GPO as a retired firefighter. The calculations can be maddening! I found it helpful to request my earnings record from SSA and run different scenarios. One factor you didn't mention is whether you're still working? If you claim before FRA and earn over the earnings limit ($22,320 in 2025), they'll withhold $1 for every $2 you earn above that limit. That could significantly reduce or eliminate your benefits until you reach FRA. Also, have you confirmed exactly how much your WEP reduction is? The WEP reduction is capped at 50% of your pension amount and can be less if you have more than 20 years of substantial earnings under Social Security. I tried for weeks to get someone at SSA on the phone to explain all this and kept hitting dead ends. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an agent in about 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. The agent was able to run different filing scenarios for me with the exact WEP reduction amounts, which made my decision much clearer.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
•Does that Claimyr thing actually work? I've been trying to reach SSA for 3 weeks about my WEP calculation and either get disconnected or told the wait is over 2 hours! So frustrated with their phone system.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
my cousin works for SSA and she says most people take it at 62 even with the reduction. but most financial advisors say wait if you can. its a personal choice either way. the WEP thing is so unfair to teachers and public workers!!! we should all be fighting to get rid of it.
0 coins
Dominic Green
•While it's true many people claim at 62, statistically that's often not the optimal financial choice. The WEP reduction can make early filing even more costly long-term. I agree the WEP feels unfair to many public servants. There have been several legislative attempts to reform or repeal it (like the Social Security Fairness Act), but none have passed yet. Until then, making the best decision within the current rules is important.
0 coins
Olivia Van-Cleve
Have you used any of the online calculators that factor in WEP? I found that most regular retirement calculators don't handle WEP properly. The SSA has a WEP calculator on their website, but it's not very user-friendly. I'm in almost the same situation (teacher in California) and decided to wait until my FRA. For me, the peace of mind of having a larger guaranteed monthly check was worth more than getting smaller checks sooner. But that's just my personal risk tolerance. My husband keeps saying I could have invested the early SS payments, but honestly, at our age, I don't want to take investment risks with money I'll need for essential expenses.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•You're right about the calculators! I tried using the SSA one but got completely confused. Did you find one that was easier to use? I'm leaning toward waiting after reading everyone's comments, especially since I don't need the money immediately. The guaranteed higher amount for life is appealing.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
To answer your question from earlier - I waited until my FRA (66+2 months for my birth year), but not to 70. My benefit went from what would have been about $1,100/month at 64 to $1,420/month at FRA. That's $320 more every month for potentially 20+ years of retirement. The WEP reduction was frustrating, but I had 25 years of substantial earnings under Social Security, so my WEP penalty was reduced somewhat (it's reduced by 5% for each year over 20 years of substantial earnings). I'd highly recommend contacting SSA directly to get their calculation of your benefits at different ages with the exact WEP reduction applied. That's the only way to make a truly informed decision.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•That increase from waiting is significant! I've tried calling SSA multiple times but either get disconnected or told the wait is 2+ hours. I'll try again though since having the exact numbers seems important. I think I have 22 years of substantial earnings, so my WEP penalty should be reduced a bit too, but it's hard to figure out exactly how much from their statements.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
THEY DONT MAKE IT EASY DO THEY?? my brother in law had same problem with WEP and GPO from his job as a police officer. Ended up just taking SS early because he said the whole system is rigged anyway. He said the extra money NOW was worth more than MAYBE getting more later. makes sense to me!
0 coins
Dominic Green
•While frustration with the system is understandable, making retirement decisions based on emotion rather than careful financial analysis isn't ideal. Everyone's situation is different, but numerous studies show that for many people (especially those with average or better longevity), waiting provides greater lifetime benefits. The Social Security Administration actually provides specific WEP and GPO calculators to help people in these situations make informed decisions based on their actual benefit amounts rather than general principles or frustration.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
To the person who asked if Claimyr works - yes, it definitely did for me. After weeks of frustration trying to get through to SSA about my WEP calculation, I was connected in about 15 minutes. The agent was able to pull up my record and give me exact benefit amounts with WEP reductions for ages 62, FRA, and 70. Made my decision so much clearer having the real numbers. For the original poster, having those exact figures from SSA is really valuable for WEP situations since the reductions can vary based on your specific earnings history.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•Thanks for confirming that Claimyr works! I'm going to try it tomorrow. I really need to speak with someone who can explain exactly how much my WEP reduction will be at different ages. Getting the actual numbers will help me make this decision with confidence instead of guessing.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
my moms friend waited til 70 to get the maximum and said its the best decision she ever made. but she didn't have WEP so idk if that applies to you
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
•The decision calculation is similar with WEP, just with lower overall benefit amounts. The percentage increases for waiting are the same: - Filing 36 months early reduces benefits by about 20% - Each year you delay past FRA increases benefits by 8% So the relative advantage of waiting vs. claiming early is consistent, regardless of whether WEP applies. The key difference is that when your starting amount is lower due to WEP, you need to consider whether the absolute dollar increase (not just the percentage) is worth waiting for.
0 coins