Can I claim survivor benefits from first husband despite WEP reduction on my teacher pension?
I've worked as a math teacher for 31 years and currently receive my pension ($3,900/month). My Social Security retirement benefit is heavily reduced because of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) - I'm only getting $520/month instead of what would have been around $1,250. I know there's been talk about WEP reform, but I'm not betting on it happening anytime soon. Here's my complicated situation: My first husband passed away in 2001 (we were married for 12 years). I remarried in 2003 but that marriage ended in divorce in 2015 after 12 years. I just turned 67 last month and I'm wondering if I can collect survivor benefits based on my first husband's record even though I'm already collecting my reduced Social Security retirement. Would this be considered "double dipping"? Does the WEP reduction also apply to survivor benefits? I'm not sure if I should just keep what I have or if I'm leaving money on the table. Has anyone navigated this specific situation with first spouse survivor benefits while being affected by WEP?
18 comments
Freya Thomsen
if u already get ur own SS benefits (even with WEP reduction) i think u cant get survivor benefits too!! i think thats double dipping. my cousin tried to get both and they said NO WAY. But maybe someone here knows more?
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Thanks for responding. That's what I was afraid of, but I've heard conflicting information. Did your cousin have a teacher pension too? I'm wondering if my situation might be different because of the WEP reduction.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
This isn't double dipping at all - you're actually entitled to BOTH benefits in your situation. When dealing with survivor benefits, the Government Pension Offset (GPO) may apply instead of WEP, but the key here is that you can definitely receive both your own retirement benefit AND a survivor benefit from your first husband's record, though you'll receive the higher of the two amounts, not both full amounts combined. Since you were married to your first husband for more than 10 years before he passed away, and your second marriage ended in divorce, you absolutely maintain eligibility for survivor benefits based on your first husband's work record. Your remarriage ending in divorce actually restores your eligibility for survivor benefits from your first marriage. Call SSA directly to inquire about what your survivor benefit amount would be - it might be significantly higher than your WEP-reduced benefit, especially if your first husband had substantial earnings.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Thank you so much for this detailed explanation! This is exactly what I was hoping to hear. I didn't realize that my second marriage ending in divorce would restore my eligibility for survivor benefits from my first husband. I'll definitely call SSA to get the exact figures. Do you know if there's a specific department or person I should ask for when I call?
0 coins
AstroAce
You've been given mostly accurate information above, but I want to clarify a few things based on my experience (I'm a retired financial planner who specialized in teacher retirement issues): 1. WEP affects YOUR OWN Social Security benefits based on YOUR work record 2. GPO (Government Pension Offset) affects SPOUSAL or SURVIVOR benefits 3. With GPO, your teacher pension will reduce survivor benefits by 2/3 of your pension amount Here's the calculation: - Your teacher pension: $3,900/month - GPO reduction: $3,900 × 2/3 = $2,600 - This means your survivor benefit would be reduced by $2,600 If your late husband's benefit (at your full retirement age) would be more than $3,120/month ($520 + $2,600), then switching to survivor benefits would increase your monthly payment. If it's less, then staying on your own reduced benefit is better. You're definitely eligible since your second marriage ended in divorce and you're past your full retirement age.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Thank you for spelling out the calculations so clearly! This helps tremendously. I believe my first husband's benefit would have been around $2,800/month at his full retirement age, so after the GPO reduction, it sounds like I might still be better off with my current situation. I'll verify all the numbers with SSA, but your explanation gives me a much better understanding of what to expect.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
The WEP is such garbage!! I'm so angry about this penalty on teachers. They promised to get rid of it and nothing has happened! It's complete BS that you worked hard teaching our kids and now they're stealing your benefits! Did you know that Texas and a bunch of other states are fighting this? My mom lost almost 60% of her Social Security because she was a teacher for 35 years and it makes me FURIOUS!!!
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
•PREACH!!! my aunt lost like $800 a month because of this stupid rule! she paid into social security for years at her summer jobs and before teaching and they just took it away!
0 coins
Diego Rojas
I just went through almost this exact situation last year! My first husband passed in 1998 (married 14 years), then I remarried and later divorced. I'm a retired school administrator with a pension and WEP reduction. What I learned: YES, you CAN claim survivor benefits from your first husband, but here's the critical part: GPO (Government Pension Offset) will reduce those survivor benefits by 2/3 of your pension amount. Trying to get accurate information from SSA was nearly impossible - I called 18 times over 3 months and got disconnected or had 3+ hour wait times. I finally used Claimyr (claimyr.com) to get through to an agent without the wait. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Totally worth it because I finally got to speak with someone knowledgeable who calculated my exact benefit. In my case, even with the GPO reduction, I still got an extra $370/month by switching to survivor benefits. Definitely worth checking!
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Thank you for sharing your experience! It's incredibly helpful to hear from someone who's been through almost the exact same situation. I've been dreading the call to SSA for exactly the reasons you mentioned - the long wait times and getting disconnected. I'll check out that service you mentioned. An extra $370/month would make a significant difference in my budget!
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
Quick question - doesn't the wep reform bill that was introduced mean you'll get your full benefits soon anyway? I thought I read somewhere Biden signed something to fix this already
0 coins
AstroAce
•No, unfortunately that's not accurate. While there have been several WEP reform bills introduced in Congress (including the Social Security Fairness Act), none have been passed into law yet. There's been bipartisan support for reform, but concerns about the cost have prevented passage so far. The President has expressed support for reform, but nothing has been signed into law that would eliminate or reduce the WEP impact for current retirees.
0 coins
Sean O'Donnell
My advice would be to make an appointment at your local Social Security office rather than trying to figure this out by phone. They can run the calculations right in front of you and explain everything. I tried calling for weeks and kept getting different answers. When I finally went in person, the representative pulled up all my information and showed me exactly what I was eligible for. Turned out I was leaving about $380/month on the table by not claiming widow's benefits!
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•That's excellent advice. I'm going to try to make an appointment. Did you have to wait long to get one? I've heard the wait times for in-person appointments can be several weeks or even months in some areas.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
Has anyone here actually had success getting through the WEP reduction? My dad just retired from teaching and they cut his SS by almost half and were super nasty about it when he asked questions!!! He worked construction for 15 years before teaching and now they're acting like those years don't count!!!
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•It's THEFT, plain and simple! I've written to my congressman 3 times about this and they just send form letters back. The system is rigged against public servants!
0 coins
Omar Zaki
To answer your original question directly: This is NOT double dipping. The Supreme Court has clearly established that survivor benefits and your own retirement benefits are separate entitlements. GPO may reduce the amount, but you are fully entitled to apply for and receive survivor benefits even while receiving your own retirement benefit. One crucial point I should add - you'll want to specifically request a "survivor benefit calculation with GPO consideration" when you contact SSA. Many representatives don't deal with GPO cases regularly and might give incorrect information if you don't use the specific terminology. If your calculated survivor benefit after GPO ends up higher than your current WEP-reduced benefit, they will pay you the difference.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Thank you for the specific language to use! This will be extremely helpful when I contact SSA. I really appreciate everyone's insights and advice. I feel much more prepared to navigate this complicated situation now.
0 coins