Maximizing Social Security family benefit - SSI, disabled adult child + minors strategy question
I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle auxiliary benefits for my family now that I started receiving my retirement benefits in February (at my FRA). My situation is complicated and I'm struggling with the math: 1) My wife is at her FRA but doesn't have enough work credits for her own benefit, so she'll need to claim on my record (but hasn't applied yet) 2) I have a 27-year-old daughter who's been disabled since age 19 (before 22) currently getting SSI 3) I also have two kids (ages 13 and 14) who are eligible for benefits on my record The Family Maximum Benefit on my record is $2675. A Social Security rep told me my disabled daughter needs to apply for disabled adult child benefits on my record now that I'm collecting. My big question: Would we receive more overall if EVERYONE (wife + all 3 kids) applies, even though it would reduce each person's portion? My understanding is my disabled daughter would still get SSI to make up the difference between her auxiliary benefit and the SSI maximum. Or should I just have my minor children apply and not my wife? Or just my wife and disabled daughter? I think the difference could be $300-400 monthly depending on which strategy I choose. Tax implications are another concern - maybe I should have my wife wait until the minor kids age out at 18? Sorry for the confusing post...this family maximum stuff is making my head spin!
16 comments
QuantumLeap
You're right that your disabled daughter's SSI would be reduced by her Child's Insurance Benefit (CIB) amount, minus the $20 general income exclusion. The family maximum is going to limit everyone equally - so each eligible person gets the same percentage reduction when the maximum is reached. Have you calculated what your disabled daughter's SSI reduction would be? That's the key piece. If she gets $914 in SSI now, and gets $800 in CIB, her SSI would drop to around $134 ($914 - ($800-$20)). In my experience, having everyone apply usually maximizes total household income because the SSI offsets work in your favor.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Thanks for explaining. Her SSI is currently $721/month. So if I understand correctly, no matter who I choose to apply, each eligible person would get the same percentage of their full benefit? So I'm not choosing between different people getting different amounts - the system just applies the reduction evenly across whoever applies?
0 coins
Malik Johnson
omg the family maximum stuff is SOOO confusing i went thru this last year when my husband died and had to figure out benefits for me and my 2 kids. The SSA people gave me different answers everytime i called!!!
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•That's exactly what I'm afraid of! Did you eventually find someone who could clearly explain how it all works?
0 coins
Isabella Santos
The Family Maximum Benefit calculation is quite complex, but let me break this down for you: 1) When the total auxiliary benefits exceed the family maximum, each person's benefit is proportionally reduced 2) For your disabled adult daughter, applying for Disabled Adult Child (DAC) benefits on your record is mandatory once you're entitled to retirement benefits. This isn't optional. 3) Your wife (at FRA) would be entitled to 50% of your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) 4) Each child would be entitled to 50% of your PIA However, once the family maximum applies, everyone gets reduced proportionally. The total strategy that maximizes household income usually involves having everyone eligible apply because: - SSI is reduced by other income, but it's a safety net that ensures your disabled daughter maintains a minimum income level - The family maximum applies regardless, so spreading benefits among more people doesn't typically reduce the total household income Tax-wise, dependent benefits aren't taxable unless the dependents have other income that pushes them over the threshold. Your retirement benefits may be taxable depending on your combined income.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Thank you for that detailed explanation. I didn't realize my disabled daughter HAS to apply - the SSA rep made it sound optional. Since it sounds like everyone should apply to maximize our total household income, I'll start gathering the documents for all of them.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
You might actually want to run the numbers both ways. When I was dealing with family maximum stuff, I actually found that having my ex-wife NOT apply until our youngest turned 16 gave us more total $$ overall because of how the calculations worked. The SSA calculator on their website was useless for figuring this out.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Interesting! Did you find a good way to calculate the different scenarios? I've been trying to use the SSA calculators but they don't seem designed for comparing these complex situations.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
The SSA uses a weird formula for the family maximum. Its not just a simple percentage of ur benefit. They do this weird calculation with "bend points" that makes no sense to normal people. Your disabled daughter DEFINITELY needs to apply for DAC benefits because those are better than SSI longterm - SSI has asset limits but DAC doesn't!!
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•This is an excellent point about the asset limits. SSI restricts recipients to $2,000 in assets ($3,000 for couples), while Disabled Adult Child benefits have no asset restrictions. This is a significant advantage long-term for financial planning and quality of life.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
I had a similar situation last year with my disabled son and minor grandchildren I'm raising. I spent WEEKS trying to get through to someone at Social Security who could actually explain how the family maximum would affect everyone. After getting disconnected five times and waiting on hold for hours, I finally used this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real SSA agent in about 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The agent I spoke with ran calculations for different scenarios and found that having everyone apply actually maximized our total household income because of how the SSI offset worked for my disabled son. The key was finding someone who could run the actual numbers instead of giving general advice.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Thank you for sharing this! I've been trying to get through to SSA for a detailed calculation for weeks. I'll check out that service - I really need to speak with someone who can look at our specific numbers rather than just general advice.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
This whole SSA system is DESIGNED to be confusing!!! I bet they make it complicated on purpose so people don't get what they deserve. When my kids were eligible for benefits on my record, the SSA "forgot" to tell me about the family maximum for MONTHS and I had to fight to get backpay. And don't even get me started on how they handle the disabled adult child benefits - they made my nephew reapply THREE TIMES before they got it right!!!
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•OMG YES!!! same thing happened to my cousin. They "lost" her paperwork twice and made her start over!!
0 coins
QuantumLeap
To address your tax question: auxiliary benefits paid to dependents are potentially taxable to the dependents, not to you. But minor children and most disabled adult children rarely have enough other income to trigger taxation of Social Security benefits. Regarding the whole family applying: The family maximum will be the same regardless of who applies, but having different people apply changes how the money is distributed. Since SSI serves as a floor for your disabled daughter, having her receive benefits on your record typically works out better overall because it frees up SSI funds for others who need them. As for your wife waiting until the children age out: there's no penalty for her waiting since she's already at FRA. From a household income perspective, it might make sense for her to wait if the proportional reduction would give her very little now, but she could get the full 50% of your PIA after the children age out. If I were you, I'd have everyone apply now, then reassess when your minor children approach 18.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•This makes so much sense. I appreciate the tax clarification too. We'll go ahead with applications for everyone and then reconsider when the kids get closer to 18. Thank you!
0 coins