Social Security Administration
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm trying to understand how GPO will affect me in different scenarios with my wife's CalSTRS pension. Here's our situation: My wife has a CalSTRS pension that will pay about $7,400/month. We've selected the 100% beneficiary option, so if she passes before me, I'd receive the full $7,400/month from CalSTRS. My Social Security benefit will be around $2,304/month based on my own work record. I'm confused about how GPO works in this case. I understand it affects spousal/survivor Social Security benefits when someone gets a government pension, but: 1. While we're both alive, does GPO affect my own SS benefit at all since my wife has CalSTRS? 2. If my wife dies first, would I lose some/all of my Social Security because of GPO when I start receiving her CalSTRS pension? The CalSTRS website says GPO reduces Social Security spousal/widow benefits by 2/3 of the CalSTRS amount. So would I lose my entire $2,304 SS benefit if I'm getting $7,400 from CalSTRS as a survivor benefit? (since 2/3 of $7,400 is more than $2,304) I'm trying to plan our retirement and need to know if I'll actually have both income sources if something happens to my wife. Thanks for any help!
I was a teacher for 32 years under a state pension system that didn't pay into Social Security. My husband passed away in 2023, and I was hit hard by the Government Pension Offset (GPO) when I applied for survivor benefits - basically got nothing due to my teacher's pension. Now with the recent WEP/GPO repeal, I'm planning to reapply, but I'm wondering how quickly SSA is processing these cases? Has anyone who was previously affected by GPO successfully applied for survivor benefits since the repeal? I'm trying to figure out how long I should expect to wait before payments actually begin. My financial planning depends on this timeline. Any experiences would be helpful!
One more thing I forgot to mention: many SSA offices are offering dedicated appointment slots specifically for people affected by the WEP/GPO repeal. Call your local office and specifically ask about these special appointment times - could save you weeks of waiting.
I'm a retired teacher from Texas who went through this process last month. Applied online on February 3rd and received my first payment on March 7th - so about 5 weeks total. The key thing that helped me was creating a detailed timeline of my previous GPO denial with dates and reference numbers. One tip: when you apply, ask specifically about the "GPO repeal expedited review" - apparently there's a special code they can put on your application that prioritizes it. My local SSA office didn't mention this initially, but when I called back and asked about it, they were able to add it to my case. Also, make sure to ask for a receipt or confirmation number when you submit everything. I had to follow up twice because they initially couldn't locate my application in their system. Having that confirmation number saved me from having to start over completely. The retroactive payments back to January were included in my first payment, which was a nice surprise! Hang in there - it's worth the wait after all these years of getting nothing due to GPO.
Hi everyone, I'm dealing with a complicated situation and could use some clarity. I'm currently 58 and receiving SSDI benefits due to a spinal condition that prevents me from working. My ex-husband is now 63, and we divorced about 2 years ago after being married for 22 years. I haven't remarried since the divorce and honestly don't plan to. Here's what I'm worried about - if my ex-husband passes away before me, would I qualify for any survivor benefits as his ex-spouse, even though I'm already receiving SSDI? I've heard conflicting information about this. Some friends say I'd get nothing because I'm already on disability, others say I might get higher payments if his benefit amount was larger than mine. Does anyone know how this works? Would it make a difference that I was receiving SSDI during our marriage too? I'm trying to understand what financial safety nets might be available without getting caught off guard later. Thanks for any help!
my neighbor got her exs ss when he died but she had to wait till she was 60 even tho they were married for like 30 years... the whole thing is confusing
Your neighbor likely received regular survivor benefits (not disability-based). The general rule is that survivors can claim benefits as early as age 60, but disabled survivors can claim as early as age 50. Since the original poster is already on SSDI, they wouldn't need to wait until age 60 to potentially receive the higher benefit amount.
This is such valuable information for anyone in a similar situation! I wanted to add that it's also worth keeping copies of all your important documents (marriage certificate, divorce decree, etc.) in a safe place where you can easily access them if needed. One thing I learned from helping my mom navigate Social Security issues is that having everything organized beforehand makes the process much smoother when you're already dealing with the stress of a loss. You might also want to consider reaching out to your local Social Security office to get familiar with their procedures now, rather than waiting until you actually need to file a claim. It sounds like you have a good understanding of your situation now thanks to all the helpful responses here. The fact that your marriage lasted 22 years definitely works in your favor, and being on SSDI shouldn't prevent you from receiving the higher benefit if your ex-husband's amount exceeds yours.
Just turned 62 last week and trying to figure out the best strategy for claiming Social Security after my divorce. My ex and I were married for 25 years before divorcing 5 years ago (he's 64 and already collecting his benefits). I've heard conflicting information about my options and need some clarity. Is it possible to: 1) File for ex-spousal benefits now at 62 while putting my own retirement benefits on hold until I reach my full retirement age at 67? 2) Or should I just collect my own benefits at 62 with some kind of ex-spousal "top-up" if his benefit amount is higher? I worked part-time for most of our marriage raising our kids, so my benefit amount is quite a bit lower than his. I'm really confused about what strategy gives me the best long-term payout. My financial advisor mentioned something about the rules changing in 2015, but wasn't clear about how it affected my situation specifically.
The whole system is needlessly complicated. When I filed for benefits on my ex's record, the SSA agent told me I should have waited until FRA but by then it was too late - once you file early, you're stuck with the reduced amount forever. Just make sure you understand all the implications before you submit that application!
That's an excellent point about the permanence of the reduction. Once you accept a reduced benefit by filing early, that reduction (minus COLA increases) stays with you for life. The only exception is if you repay all benefits within 12 months of filing and withdraw your application, but that's rarely practical for most people.
Didn't they also change it so if your ex dies you can switch to survivor benefits? Those work differently I think. My aunt did that and got more money when her ex passed away even though she started regular benefits early.
Yes, survivor benefits are treated differently than spousal/ex-spousal benefits. If your ex-spouse passes away, you can receive survivor benefits as early as age 60 (or 50 if disabled), and these can be up to 100% of what your ex was receiving. Importantly, even under the new rules, you CAN file for survivor benefits only and delay your own retirement benefit until 70 to maximize it. This specific strategy still works because survivor benefits weren't affected by the 2015 law changes.
This is really helpful to know about survivor benefits! So even though I can't use the restricted application strategy now, if something were to happen to my ex-husband down the road, I could potentially file for survivor benefits while letting my own benefit continue to grow until 70? That's at least one strategy that's still available. Thanks for clarifying that the survivor benefit rules weren't changed in 2015 like the spousal benefit rules were.
I'm planning to start my Social Security retirement benefits in 2025, and I'm a bit confused about the COLA increases. I've reached my Full Retirement Age already but haven't started collecting yet. When looking at my estimated benefits on the MySocialSecurity portal, I noticed projected payment amounts increase each January (I'm assuming that's the COLA adjustment). My question is: If my birthday is in March and I decide to start benefits in 2025, would I get the 2025 COLA increase starting in January, or would I have to wait until March? I don't want to request a January effective date if the increase doesn't actually kick in until my birth month. I tried calling the SSA office to clarify this, but the wait time was 2 hours! Did I miss something obvious about how COLA timing works with new applications? Thanks for any insights!
I want to thank everyone for the helpful responses! Based on what you've all shared, I'm going to apply for benefits to start in January 2025 so I can get the COLA increase right away. I'll make sure to submit my application a few months in advance as suggested. I'm also going to check out that Claimyr service for getting through to SSA - sounds much better than waiting on hold for hours. Really appreciate all the insights!
One more thing to consider - since you're already past your FRA, you might want to double-check what your exact FRA was. If you were born in 1960 or later, your FRA is 67, not 66. I see a lot of people get confused about this and think they can start full benefits earlier than they actually can. Also, if you do decide to start in January, your first payment won't actually arrive until February since Social Security pays benefits the month after they're earned. Just wanted to make sure you're planning your finances accordingly!
Charlotte Jones
Just wanted to add that GPO is so frustrating for those of us affected by it. I worked as a teacher for 28 years and get a pension, but my husband had a great career with high SS earnings. When he passes, I'll only get a tiny fraction of what most widows would get from his record because of GPO. It feels so unfair that I'm punished for choosing a public service career!
0 coins
Caleb Stark
i know! its like they penalize teachers and public workers!! my friend who never worked gets MORE from her husband's ss than i will get with my 30 years of teaching just because her husband had ss and mine didnt. makes no sense!
0 coins
Paolo Romano
As a newcomer trying to understand all this, it's really helpful to see everyone's explanations! From what I'm gathering, the key distinction is that GPO only affects Social Security benefits you'd receive based on someone ELSE'S work record (like spousal or survivor benefits), but it doesn't touch the Social Security you earned from your own work history. So @Carter Holmes, your $2,304/month Social Security benefit that you earned yourself should be completely safe - GPO won't reduce it at all, even when you start receiving your wife's CalSTRS pension as a survivor benefit. The confusing part seems to be that there are two separate government pension rules (GPO and WEP) that people often mix up, plus SSA's own explanations aren't always clear. But everyone here seems to agree on the basic principle: your own earned SS benefits = protected from GPO. I'd definitely follow the advice about getting an official determination from SSA though, just to have it in writing for your peace of mind!
0 coins