

Ask the community...
I'm a Social Security disability attorney, and I want to add something important that hasn't been mentioned yet. When you go to your appointment next Tuesday, also ask about the "protective filing date." If your mother calls SSA today or tomorrow to report her intent to file for survivor benefits, they should establish a protective filing date that could help with retroactive benefits even before your in-person appointment. A protective filing date essentially "holds your place in line" and can sometimes extend the retroactive period beyond what would normally be available. This is especially important in survivor benefit cases where there may have been a communication breakdown. Also, bring a written statement detailing exactly what happened - when your father died, that no one from SSA contacted your family about survivor benefits, and that your mother continued receiving only her own benefit. Having this in writing helps ensure nothing gets missed during what can be an overwhelming appointment. One last tip: if the local office can't help with the good cause determination, ask about filing an appeal or having the case reviewed at the regional level. Sometimes different levels of the organization have different perspectives on these situations. Best of luck with your appointment - your preparation and advocacy for your mother is exactly what she needs right now.
This is incredibly valuable legal insight - thank you so much! I had no idea about the "protective filing date" concept. I'm going to call SSA first thing tomorrow morning to report mom's intent to file for survivor benefits before our Tuesday appointment. Even if we can't get through easily, it sounds like establishing that date could make a real difference in the retroactive benefits calculation. The suggestion about bringing a written timeline is perfect - I'll type up exactly what happened, including dates and the fact that no one from SSA ever contacted us about survivor benefits. Having everything documented clearly will definitely help avoid any confusion during the appointment. I really appreciate you mentioning the possibility of appealing or having the case reviewed at the regional level if the local office can't help. It's reassuring to know there are additional options if we hit roadblocks. Your expertise as a disability attorney gives me confidence that we're approaching this the right way. Thank you for taking the time to share this professional guidance!
I'm so sorry your family is dealing with this - it's such a common and heartbreaking situation. As someone who went through something similar with my grandmother, I wanted to share one more resource that really helped us. Before your Tuesday appointment, consider contacting your local AARP chapter or senior center. Many have volunteer tax preparers and benefits counselors who are very familiar with Social Security issues. They might be able to review your documentation beforehand or even accompany you to the appointment. Also, when you call tomorrow to establish that protective filing date (which is excellent advice!), make sure to get the representative's name and ask for a confirmation number or reference number for your call. This creates additional documentation that could be helpful later. One thing that worked for my grandmother was bringing a simple calculation showing exactly how much money she missed out on over the months she should have been receiving survivor benefits. Sometimes seeing the actual dollar amount helps representatives understand the real impact and take the case more seriously. You're doing such an important thing advocating for your mother. Even if you can't recover all the back payments, getting her onto the correct benefit amount going forward will make such a difference in her quality of life. Please keep us updated on how it goes!
This is such thoughtful advice, thank you! I love the idea about contacting our local AARP chapter - I hadn't even thought about that resource. My mom has been a member for years but we never realized they might have benefits counselors who could help with situations like this. I'm going to call them tomorrow along with SSA to see if someone can either help us prepare or potentially come to the appointment. The tip about getting a confirmation number when I call to establish the protective filing date is really smart too. I'll make sure to write down the representative's name and ask for any reference numbers they can give me for our records. And I really like your suggestion about bringing a calculation of the missed payments. Seeing "$43,200 in missed benefits over 36 months" written out might be more impactful than just explaining the monthly difference. Sometimes putting a real number on the financial impact helps people understand the urgency of the situation. Thank you for sharing your experience with your grandmother and for all the encouragement. It means so much to know that other families have navigated this successfully. I'll definitely update everyone after our appointment - hopefully with some good news!
One more important point - if your sister is planning to claim retirement on her own work record eventually, she needs to understand the strategy carefully. She can: 1. Take reduced survivor benefits now and later switch to her own retirement (which would continue growing until age 70) 2. Take her own reduced retirement at 62 and later switch to full survivor benefits at her full retirement age Which option is better depends on their respective earnings records. The local SSA office can run calculations to show which would give her more money long-term. Just make sure whoever she speaks with understands she wants to compare these two strategies.
I'm sorry for your family's loss. Based on what you've shared, your sister should definitely be eligible for survivor benefits since they were still legally married when he passed away. The separation doesn't matter - only the legal marital status counts. A few things to keep in mind: At 58, she can get reduced survivor benefits (around 71.5% of what she'd receive at full retirement age). However, since she's earning about $24,000, which is above the 2025 earnings limit of $22,320, her benefits will be reduced by $1 for every $2 she earns over that limit. She should apply as soon as possible since survivor benefits generally can't be paid retroactively before the application date. She'll need their marriage certificate, his death certificate, both Social Security numbers, and her birth certificate. Given her work history, it might be worth having SSA calculate whether it's better to take reduced survivor benefits now and switch to her own retirement benefit later, or take her own reduced retirement at 62 and switch to full survivor benefits at her full retirement age. The office can run these scenarios for her.
One more thing to consider that I don't think has been mentioned - if you're planning to work until 70 anyway, you might want to look into whether your employer offers a high-deductible health plan with an HSA option. Since you'll be on Medicare already, you can't contribute to an HSA anymore, but if you have one from before 65, you can still use it for medical expenses tax-free. This could help offset some of the tax burden from having both your $70K salary and SS benefits taxed together. Also, some people in your situation consider doing Roth conversions during the gap years between FRA and 70 when they're not taking SS yet - gives you more control over your tax brackets in retirement. Just another angle to think about as you're crunching those numbers!
That's a really insightful point about HSA planning! I hadn't thought about the interaction between Medicare enrollment and HSA contributions. Unfortunately, I don't have an existing HSA since my current employer only offers traditional health plans, but the Roth conversion strategy is intriguing. If I'm waiting until 70 to claim SS, those years between FRA and 70 might be a good window to manage my tax bracket more strategically. Do you have any rough guidelines on how much to consider converting annually, or is it really dependent on individual tax situations? I'm definitely going to bring this up when I talk to a financial planner - seems like there are more moving pieces to optimize than I initially realized!
Great question and really smart of you to research this thoroughly before making the decision! I'm currently 68 and went through this same analysis two years ago. Here's what I wish someone had told me: The math really does favor waiting until 70 if you can swing it financially, especially with your income level. That guaranteed 8% return is hard to beat anywhere else. But there's also a psychological factor - having that SS check coming in while you're still working gives you more flexibility if your work situation changes unexpectedly. One practical tip: consider doing a "test run" with your budget. Calculate what your monthly expenses would be if you were only living on your $70K salary (minus taxes, 401k contributions, etc.) and see how comfortable that feels. If you can live well on just your work income, that makes the case for waiting until 70 much stronger since you're not sacrificing your lifestyle. Also, don't forget that your SS benefit will get annual COLA increases once you start collecting, so that higher base amount from waiting pays dividends every year through cost of living adjustments. The difference compounds over time!
This is incredibly helpful advice, especially the "test run" idea! I never thought about actually living on just my work salary for a few months to see how it feels. That's such a practical way to test whether I really need the SS income right now or if I can comfortably wait for the higher benefits at 70. The point about COLA increases compounding on a higher base is also really compelling - I hadn't fully considered how that 24% increase would grow even more over time with annual adjustments. I think I'm going to try your budget test approach over the next few months while I continue researching. If I can live comfortably on just my work income, that definitely makes the case for delayed retirement credits much stronger. Thanks for sharing your real-world experience with this decision!
Great point about IRMAA surcharges! That's something many people overlook. The Medicare high-income surcharges are based on your tax return from 2 years prior, so a large lump sum in 2025 could definitely impact your Medicare premiums in 2027. For someone in your situation still working with good income, you might want to run the numbers on whether spreading the benefit start over two tax years (like the January 2026 filing strategy mentioned earlier) could help you avoid crossing the IRMAA thresholds. The first IRMAA tier starts at $106,000 for individuals in 2025, and it goes up from there. Also, don't forget that if you do end up with a big tax bill from the retroactive benefits, you might need to make estimated tax payments to avoid underpayment penalties. The IRS doesn't care that it all came in one lump sum - they expect you to pay quarterly if you're going to owe more than $1,000.
This is really helpful information about IRMAA that I hadn't fully considered! As someone new to navigating Social Security decisions, I'm realizing there are so many interconnected tax implications beyond just the immediate income tax hit. The quarterly estimated payment requirement is especially important to know about - I definitely don't want to get hit with underpayment penalties on top of everything else. It sounds like the January 2026 filing strategy might be worth the trade-off of losing one month's benefit if it helps avoid crossing those IRMAA thresholds. Thank you for breaking down these details that aren't immediately obvious when you're just focused on maximizing the benefit amount!
As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed at how many nuanced factors go into Social Security timing decisions! Reading through all these responses has been incredibly educational. @Dominic Green, your situation sounds similar to what my parents might face soon. One thing I'm wondering about - has anyone here worked with a tax professional specifically on Social Security timing strategies? With all these interconnected issues (IRMAA, estimated payments, bracket management, state taxes potentially), it seems like the complexity might warrant professional guidance beyond just calling SSA directly. Also, for those who've gone through this process, how accurate were your initial benefit estimates from the SSA website compared to what you actually received? I'm helping my parents plan and want to make sure we're working with realistic numbers for all these tax calculations. Thanks to everyone sharing their real experiences - it's so much more valuable than just reading the official SSA publications!
@Isaac Wright Great question about working with tax professionals! As someone just learning about all this, I d'definitely recommend it for complex situations like Dominic s.'The interconnections between Social Security timing, IRMAA thresholds, and tax bracket management seem way too complicated to wing it without professional help. I m'curious about the SSA benefit estimate accuracy too - my understanding is that the online estimates are pretty solid for the base calculation, but they might not account for all the nuances like how your final year of earnings could bump up your benefit if you re'still working at higher wages. One thing I m'realizing from this thread is that there s'no one "size fits all strategy." Everyone s'situation with current income, other retirement accounts, state taxes, etc. makes the optimal timing different. Really appreciate everyone sharing their real-world experiences here - it s'giving me a much better framework for when my family faces these decisions!
Elin Robinson
As someone who just went through a similar situation with my own divorce, I can confirm what others have said here. The key thing to remember is that Social Security looks at your marital status at the time you apply for benefits, not what happened in between. Your ex-wife can absolutely claim on your record since you were married 17 years (well over the 10-year requirement) and she's currently unmarried after her second divorce ended. The length of that second marriage doesn't matter at all - could have been 6 months or 6 years. However, given what you mentioned about her being a teacher with a pension, the Government Pension Offset (GPO) that Miguel mentioned could be a major factor. GPO can significantly reduce or even eliminate spousal benefits for people receiving government pensions. She really needs to get specific calculations from SSA to see if claiming on your record would even provide any benefit after GPO is applied. My advice: both of you should create accounts on ssa.gov to see your estimated benefits, and then she should definitely speak with an SSA representative about how GPO would affect her situation specifically.
0 coins
Christian Burns
•This is really helpful information, thank you! I'm completely new to understanding Social Security rules and had no idea about things like GPO. It sounds like even though she technically qualifies to claim on my record due to our 17-year marriage and her current unmarried status, her teacher's pension could wipe out most or all of those benefits anyway. I'm starting to think she may not have realized this either when she brought it up. The ssa.gov account suggestion is great - I'll definitely set that up to see what my own estimated benefits look like. It's frustrating how complex all these rules are, but I appreciate everyone breaking it down in terms I can understand.
0 coins
Liam Brown
I'm dealing with a somewhat similar situation right now. My ex-husband and I were married for 12 years before divorcing in 2018. He remarried in 2020, but I heard through mutual friends that he's now separated and likely heading for divorce. From what I understand based on the responses here, if his second marriage officially ends, I would still be eligible to claim on his record when I reach 62 (I'm 58 now) since our marriage exceeded 10 years and I've remained unmarried. Is that correct? It's honestly frustrating how complicated these rules are. I've been putting off learning about Social Security benefits because it seemed so confusing, but reading this thread has been really helpful in understanding the basics. The GPO issue doesn't apply to me since I work in the private sector, but I can see how that would complicate things significantly for teachers and other government employees. Thanks to everyone sharing their knowledge and experiences - it's much clearer now than trying to navigate the SSA website alone!
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•Yes, that's exactly right! Your eligibility to claim on your ex-husband's record is based on your 12-year marriage (which meets the 10-year requirement) and your current unmarried status. His remarriage and potential second divorce don't affect your eligibility at all - only your own marital status matters when you apply. Since you've remained unmarried since your 2018 divorce, you'll be eligible to file for divorced spouse benefits once you turn 62, regardless of what happens with his current marriage situation. And since you mentioned you work in the private sector, you won't have to worry about GPO reducing your benefits like the original poster's ex-wife might. I'm glad this thread has been helpful! The SSA website can definitely be overwhelming, but once you understand the basic rules, it becomes much clearer. You might want to create that ssa.gov account others mentioned to start tracking your estimated benefits as you get closer to 62.
0 coins